Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Aunms I I. -.r*:s.\n PHIOE XBASXEL LIIIm.SvTV .‘w?X~Y_,~ September 13, 1951 Hon. Buster Brown Opinion No. V-1284 Secretary Texas Board of Pharmacy Re: Whether physicians or Temple, Texan hospital or clllllcdis- pensarlea may dispense medications for a sepa- rate fee without a per- mit and without being or retaining a licensed pear Sir: pharmaciet. You have requested our opinion on the fol- lowing Questions pertaMng to the Texas Pharmacy Act (Art. 4542a, V.C.S.), aa amended by Seaate Bill 268, Acts 52nd Leg., R.S. 1951, ch. 469, p. 824: #l. May a physician dispense medi- cation for which a separate fee from hIa rofeaelonal services is charged and not En included under the licensing section of the law? '2. Can the dlepeneary of a hospital or clinic furnish medication at a aepa- rate fee for persona not patients without hiring a pharmacist and obtaining a per- mit? -3. Under terms of the fourth para- graph of Article 7588. Vernon!8 Penal Code, 1s not the dispensing of drugs limited to a licensed pharmaclat whether the dispensary la a retail drug store or a hospital or clinic dispensary?" Section 8 of Ari;Icl.e 4542a a8 amended by Senate Bill 268, sunra, provides: #It shall be ~~l:twl~ul for sny per- son who 18 not a rcglstered pharmacist under the provlslon::of thla Act to com- pound, mix. manufacture, combine, pre- pare, label. sell, or dietribute at re- Hon. Buster Brown, page 2 (V-1284) tail or wholesale any drugs or medicines, except In original packages. Provided that all persons now registered as phar- macists in this State shall have all rights granted to pharmacistsunder this Act: provided, however, that nothlrgln this Act shsll apply to or interfere with licensed practitionersof medicine, dentlstry or chiropody,who ie duly reg- istered as such by his respective State Board of Examiners of this State and no shall be construeh~to restrain a bona fide hospital or clinic from operating a dispensary or apothecary shop In order to provide services to its patients. Provided further, that nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to pre- vent the personal admfnistratlonof drugs and medicines carpied by any physician, surgeon, dentist, chiropodist or veter- inarian licensed by his respective Board of Examiners of this State, in order to supply the needs of his patients: nor to prevent the sale by peraone, firms, joint stock companies, partnershipsor corpora- tions, other than registered pharmaclete, of patent or proprietarymedicines, or remedies and medicaznents generally in use and which are harmless lf used ac- cording to instructionsas contained upon the printed label: and insecticides and fungicides and chemlcals ueeQ in the arte, when properly labeled: nor lneecti- cldes or fungicides that are mixed or compoundedfor purely agriculturalpur- poeee.” (Underscoringsupplied.) Prior to the above amendment, a physician could not operate a retail drug store or dispense medicationfor any person except his own patients unless he was a registered pharmacisthimself or had one continuallyemployed therein. However, the underscoredprovlslon of the Act as amended clearly authorizesa physician to dispense medication for Hon. Buster Brown, page 3 (V-1284) persona other thanhla patients. Since Section 8 of the Act provides that no provisions of the Act shall be construed to restrain physicians from operating a dispensary, prescriptionlaboratory, or apothecary shop, it is our opinion that a phgsl- clan cannot be required to obtain a pharmacist's license in order to dispense medicationsfor which a fee separate,fromhis professionalservices Ia charged. Any other constructionwould be contrary to the plain provisions of Section 8. Sections 17 and 19. Article 4542a, V.C.S., as amended,'providet 'Section 17. Every pereon. firm, joint stock company, partnership or corporationdesiring to operate a re- tall pharmacy, drug store, dispensary, or apothecary shop in thla State, as the same is defined herein; and every manufacturer of drugs and msdlclnee, as defined herein, after the passage of this Act, shall procure from the State Board of Pharmacy a permit for each store or factory to be operated by making an application to the Board,, upon a form to be furnished by the Board, setting forth under oath owner- ship and location, and the name and certificatenumber of \thepharmficlst registered in this State who is to be continuallyemployed by the drug store or pharmacy, or the pharmaceutical chemist or chemist qualified by acl- entlflc training, who Ia to be employ- ed by the factolyor manufacturer;pro- vided that the Boara~may in lta dia- cretlon refuse to lseue such permit to such applicant unless furnished with satisfactoryproof that such ap- plicant 16 engaged in the business of conducting a pharmacy, drug store, dldpenaary, apothecary ehop or factory for the purpose of manufacturingdrugs. *Provided further, that at any time after the laauance of a permit by the State Board of PhamPacy to such applicant, the Board may revoke,suepend Hon. Buster Brown, page 4 (V-1284) or cancel the permit when satisfactory proof has been preeented to the Board that said permit holder 18 not conduct- ing a bona fide pharmacy, drug store, dispensary,apothecary shop or preecrlp- tlon laboratory,and any inspector,mem- belr,or official of the Board la hereby empowered to take charge of such permit pending final hearing before the Board, as to the revocation of same. The permit provided for herein shall be lasued an- nually by the Board upon receipt of pop- ~~~g;~yg,B,~~yg z&yy;, be displayed conspicuouslyat all times in the pharmacy, drug store, dispensary, apothecary shop OT factory to which it ia issued. “All such permits shall expire on May 31at of each year and must be re- newed on or before June 1st of each year. -Very pemon, firm, joint stock company, partnerahlp, corporationor manufacturerdeslHng to open a new pharmacy, drug &ore, dispensary,apoth- ecary shop, or factoryahall procure the permit above mentioned before beginning its operation as such; and the same discretionarypowers may be used by the Board ln passing u on such applications; not more than one P1) etore or factory may be operated under one (1) permit. “In case of a change in pereonnel of registered pharmaclete,the Board shall be notified of such change wlthln tea (10) days ; provided the same pharma- cl&i’s name shall not appeal?on more than oae (1) permit. ‘Provided however, that no pro- olslon of this Act shall be construed to apply to any hospital or cllnlc malntalnlng‘3r operating a dispensary, apothecary shop or preecrlptlon lab- oratory for the care of its patients Hon. Buster Brown, page 5 (V-1284) as long as a licensed pharmacist Is con- tinually employed to compound said pre- scriptlona. “section lg. A P~==cY, drug atore, dlapeneary,apothecary shop, or preecrlptlon laboratory,as used in this Act, is any atore or place where drugs or msdlclnee are sold or furnished In any manner at retail or for a fee to the consumer wherein a registeredphar- macist is employed. “Provided, however, that no pro- vision of thla Act shall be construed to apply to any hospital or clinic maintaining or operatinga dlapeaaary, apothecary ahop or prescriptionlab- oratory for the care of lta patleats aa long ae a licensed pharmacist is continuallyeqloyed to compound said prei3criptloaa. There is nothiqln the Act which exempta phyalclansfrom the provlalons of Section 17, which requires every pereon who operates a drug store to secure a permit f’rcun the State Board of Pharmacy. Therefore, it Is our opinion that a physician may not dispense medlcaton fur which a fee separate from his’professional services la charged without first obtaining a permit. Although Section 8 of the Act provia& that.*no,provlslon of the Act shall be construed to restrain a boaa ride hospital or clinic from operating a aispeaeary or apothecary shop in order to provide services to its patlenta,Y both Sections 17 and 19 provide that a registered pharmacist must be continuallyemp1oye.Q.to compound the pre- ecrlptiona., In view of the foregoing, It la our opln- ion that the dispensary of a hospital or clinic muet continuallyemploy a pkirmaclat to Oomp0~a the preecrlptloneand may not mnleh medication to persqps other than patients for a separate fee without obtaining a permit. 21 ‘of the Pharmacy Act, codified Sec.tlaol ae Article 758a, V.P.C., was not amended by Senate Bill 268, eupra. Article 758a, as amended la 1943, provides in part: 354 Hon. Buster Brown, page 6 (v-1284) 'Any peraon not being licensed aa~ a pharmacletwho shall compound,mix., blend, dispense, prepare or sell at re- tail any drug6 medicines poisons or pharmaceuticalpreparationsupon a physlclan'e prescription.or otherwise' and whoever being the man&g&r or own- er of the drug store, pharmacy or fac- tory 01 other place of buslnesa Shall manufacture,or permit anyone not ll- tensed as a pharmaclet to compound,mix, blend, dispense any drugs, medicinea, poisons or pharmaceuticalpreparations, on phyelclan'sprescription,contrary to any of the pro~lsio~ of this Act, ahall be subject to the penalties of thle Act." ObviouslyArticle &42a,V.C.S., ae amended and Article 7!j8a,V.P.C., are now in conflict lneo- far aa they apply to phyalclana. In Po e&$2;;:. 615, 51 S-W. 26 680, 'As to tb question whether the act of 1931 repeals the act of 1930, we are of the oplnlonthatltdoes. In tbls connectloa It will be noted that the act of 1931 ie a later aot, and, In 80 far aa prescribing the terms of office ia coacerned, it ab- solutely conflictswith the 1930 act. The former act fixes the term of of- fice at four yeare, while the latter act fixes such term at two years. The act of 1931 does not mention that of 1930 but in 80 far a8 the term of office is concerned, the two acts are abaolutely antagonistic to each other. It follows that the latter act repeals the former by lmpllca- tion.* Also see Parehall Q. State, 62 TOX. 0ri.m. 177, 138 S.W. 759 n911) Robertson Q. State, 70 Tex. Crlm. 307, 159 S.W.;7-] Towneeaa v. Terrell, 118 Tex. 463, 16 S.W.2d 10:3=9J1 %ate v. ou&western Qas 8 Electric Oompan& 145 Ter Att'y Gen. Ops. v-990 ., . . 33.55 Eon. Buster BWn,.'page 7 (V-1284) Article &542a, V.C.S., as amended, having been passed subsequent to Article 758a, V.P.C., vi11 control. Therefore, it Is our opinion that under the terms of SenateBIll 268, supra, licensed practltlonersof mecllcine,dentistry, or chlropoily, are exempt from the provision of Article '@a vhich states that any person not licensed as a pharmacistwho doea any of the enumerated acts shall be subject to a penalty. A physician may dispense medication for which a separate fee from his pro- fesslonal services Is charged without obtaining a license to practice phar- macy, but he may not do SO without ob- taining a permit as required by Section 17 of Artlole 4542a, V.C.S. The aiapeneary of a hospital or clinic must continuallyemploy a phar- macist to 00mp0una prescriptionsana may not furnish medication for a sepa- rate ree to persons ottir than patients vlthout obtaining a permit. Senate Bill 268, Acts 52na Leg., R.S. 1951, oh. 469, p. 824, exempta licenaea practitioners of maiotii3, dentistry, or ohlropody from the pro- vision or Article 758a, V.P.C., vhlch prascrlbes a penalty for the aispens- lag OS drugs by persone other than reglstema phammclets. APPROVEDx Yours very trulg J. C. Davis, Jr. PRICE DARIEL County Affairs Division Attorney C!%neral Jesse P. Luton, Jr. Reviewing Assistant Everett Rutahlnaon BY iiZXn% Executive Asristant Assistant BArlgrawo