Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

R-804 5sr OFPICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AVSTIN. TEXAS PRICE DANIEL .4TTORNEYGENERAL October 7, 1947 Hon. Gene Maddin Opinion No. V-400 District Attorney McLennan County Re: May beer, as defined by Waco, Texas Art. 667-1, V.P.C., be legally sold in Justice Precinct No. 5 of McLen- nan County, Texas? Dear Mr. Ma&din: Your.letter requesting an opinion of this Department reads, in part, as follows: "In the year 1909, Justic&'.Precinct No. 5 of McLennan County, Texas, by local option voted said precinct dry as to both liquor ana beer. No local option election has been held in said precinct since said time except that in the year 1933 a local option election was held under the provis- ion'of Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-third Legislature at which election sale and aistribntion 0; vinous and malt beverages containing one- half of one per. cent or more of alcohol by volume and not more than three' and two- tenths per centum of alcohol by weight was adopted under the 1933 amendment to Section 20, Article 16 of the Constitution of Texas. "By county wide loc.al option elections under the 1935 statutes, McLennan County, Texas, generally is wet as to beer and dry as to all other forms of intoxicating liquor. : Can beer as defined by Arti- cle 66ymof t e Penal Code of Texas be legal- ly s0ia in Justice Precinct No. 5 of McLennan County, Texas?" We shall assume for purposes of this opinion that.the 1933 local option election held in Justice we- cinctJ0. 5 was valid in all respects! and that no county- wide election resulting in the prohibltion of all.albohol- ic beverages has been held in YIcLennan County since 1933. 558 Hon. Gene Maaain - Page 2 (V-400) The local option election held in Justice Precinct No. 5 was held under the authority of Article XVI, Section 20 of the Constitution of Texas, as amendea in 1933, and in accordance with Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session, Forty-third Legislature. Article XVI, Section 20 as adopted August 26, 1933, was the so-called “beer amendment”. This amendment is quoted in full as r0lhvs: “The manufacture, sale, barter or exchange in the State of Texas of spirituous, vinous or malt liquors or medicated bitters capable of producing intoxication or any other intoxicant whatever except vinous or malt liquors 0r not more thti three and two-tenths per cent (3.2$) alcoholic content.by weight, (except for medi- cinal, mechanical, scientific, or sacremental purposes) are each and all hereby prohibited. The Legislature shall enact laws to enforce this Section, and may from time to time pre- scribe regulations and limitations relotive to the manufacture, sale, barter, exchange;or possession for sale or vinous or malt liquors of not more than three and two-tenths per cent (3.2%) alcoholic content by weight; provided the Legislature shall enact a law or laws where- by the qualified voters of~any county, justice’s precinct, town or city may, by a majority vote of those voting, determine from time to time whether the sale for beverage purposes of vin- ous or malt liquors containing not more than three and two-tenths per cent (3.27%) alcohol by weight shall be prohibited within the pre- scribed limits; and provided further that in all counties in the State of Texas and in all political subdivisions thereof, wherein the sale of intoxicating liquors had been prohibitea by local option elections held under the laws of the State of Texas and in force at the time of the taking effect of Section 20, Article 16, of the Constitution of Texas, it shall continue to be unlawful to manufacture, sell, barter or exchange in any such county or in any such polit- ical subdivision thereof, any spiritous, vinous or malt liquors or medicated bitters, capable of producing intoxication or any other intoxi- cant whatsoever, unless ana until a majority of the ~ualiriea voters in said county or po- ‘litical subdivision thereof voting in, an elec- ti on el or sue 559 Hon. Gene Maddin - Page 3 (V-400) to be lawful to manufacture. sell, barter and exchange in said county or politioal subdivi- sion thereof vlnous or malt liquors contain- tig not more than three and two-tenths per cent (3.2p) alcoholic content by weight, and %he provisions of this subsection shall b self -enac n ." (Emphasis added througholt ‘this opinion) ‘.A Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-third Legislature was passed prior to the a&option of the above constitutional amendment and became effect- ive September 15, 1933. Generally described, it was an act regulating the manufacture, sale, distribution, ana transportation of vinous or malt beverages. Section 1 (a) of this act defined "beer* as follows: "The word 'beer' as hereinafter used in this Aat ana for the purposes of this Act shall mean beer containing one-half (1) of one per oent (1%) or more of aloohol by volume and not more than three and two-tenths per centum (3.2%) or alcohol by weight." Thus, it beoomes apparent that under the consti- tutional and statutory provisions in etfect in 1933, when the election was held in Justice Preoinct No. 5, only vinous or malt liquors containing not more than 3.2 per cent alcohol byweight could be lesalizea. In 1935, Article XVI, Section 20 of the Texas Constitution was again amended to authorize the sale of all liquors within the State of Texas in such counties, justice precincts, or incorporated cities or towns as should by local option legalize them, This amendment is now in effect and in so far as pertinent to the point un- der discussion is quoted below: "(Cl In all counties, justice's precincts or incorporated towns or cities wherein the sale of intoxioating liquors had been pro- hibitea by local option elections held under the laws of the State of Texas and in force at the tine of the taking effect of Seotion 20, Article XVI of the Constitution of Texas, it shall continue to be unlawful to manuftic- ture, sell, barter or exchange in any such county, justice's precinct or 1ncorporateK town or city, any spiritous, vinous or malt 560 Hon. Gene Maddin - Page 4 (V-400) liquors or medicated bitters capable of producing intoxication or any other in- toxicants whatsoever, for beverage pur- poses unless and until a majority of the qualified voters in such county or poli- tical subdivision thereof voting in an election held for such purpose shall de- Pursuant to this 1935 constitutional amendment, the Second Called Session of the Forty-fourth Legislature repealed Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-third Legislature,. and passed Chapter 467 commonly referred to as the Texas Liquor Control Act. This act, as amended, is coairied as Articles 666 and 667 of Ver- non’s Penal Code and constitutes the Texas Liquor Control Act .as it now exists. The definition of “beer” set out in Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty- third Legislature, and quoted above was repealed and AC- title 667-1(b) or Vernon’s Penal code, as now in effect, defines *beer* as a malt beverage containing one half of 1 per cent or more of alcohol by volume and not more than 4 per cent of alcohol by weight. ‘--q Chapter 448, Acts of the Regular Session, Forty- fifth Legislature, was passed in 1937, .3na was an act re- vising the Texas Liquor Control Act as originally passea in 1935. Article II, Section 2 of Chapter 448 provides in part as follows: x., - n. . . . in justice precincts . . . wherein a majority of the voters have voted to legalize the sale of beer in accordance with the loc’al opt ion provis- ions of Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-third Legislature . . . . beer as herein defined may be manufactured. distributed and sold as herein provided. Hon. Gene Maddin - Page 5 (V-400) 563, The words "beer as herein defined" refer baok to Article II, Seotlon l(b) of Chapter I+@, which pre- .* oeaes the above provision and which is quoted as follows: "The term 'beer' means a malt beverage containing one-half of one per cent or more of alcohol by volume and not more than four (4) per cent of alcohol by weight, and shall not be inclusive of any beverage designated by label or otherwise by any oth- er name than beer." This is the same d.efinition which is now cod.& flea as Article 667-1(b) of Vernon's Penal Code. There- fore, the Legislature, when they used the words "beer as herein defined" could only have intended 4 per cent beer. The import of the language is to legalize the sale of 4 per cent beer in counties, justice precincts and incor- porated cities or towns which voted to legalize 3.2 'per cent beer under the authority of the 1933 constitutional amendment and in accordance with the local option provis- ions of Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session or the 43ra Legislature. This appears to be the legislative in- tent despite the following language which appears in or- title XVI, Section 20 of the Texas Constitution as final- ly amended in 1935: ". . . . provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages containing not more than 3.2 per cent alcohol by weight in cities, counties political subdivisions thereof in which the qualified vot6rs have voted to legal- ize such sale under the provisions of Chap- ter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the 43ra Legislature." The language quoted immediately above limits the alcoholic content of beverages legaliz+ under the prods- ions of Chapter 116, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-third Legislature to %ot more than 3.2 per cent al- cohol by weight." We are familiar with the rule of stat- utory construction to the effect that all doubts must be resolved in favor of the constitutionality of a statute, but we believe that part of Chapter 448, Acts of the Reg- ular Session, Forty-fifth Legislature, referred to above, is in clear ana irreconcilable conflict with that part of the constitutional amendment of 1935 quoted immediately above'. We believe strength is aadecl to this contention by 562Hon . Gene Maadili - Page 6 (V-400) the many Texas decisions to the effect that ‘the local option status of a particular political subdivision may be changed only by the voters in the territory where such law was ori inally vitalized; See Houchins v. Plainos; 110 S. W. 7 2d) 549, and cases cited there- in. It is, therefore, the opinion of this Department that Article II, Section 2 of Chapter 448, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-fifth Legislature? oodi-- fled as Article 667-2 of Vernon's Penal Code, in so far as it attempts to legalize 4 per cent beer in tise political subdivisions which had voted to legalize on- ly 3.2 per cent beer under the provisions of Chapter U6, Acts of the Regular Session of the.Forty-third Legislature is violative of Article XVI, Section 20, of the Texas Constitution adopted in 1935. It is the further opinion of this Department that only beer of an alcoholic content not in excess of 3.2 per cent by weight may be legally sold in Justice Precinct No. 5 of MoLennan County, Texas. Article II, Section 2 of Chapter I+@, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-f1ft.h Legis- lature, in so far as it attempts to legalize 4’ per cent beer in those political subdivisions which had voted to legalize only 3.2 per cent beer in 1933 is in conflict with Article XVI, Section 20 of the Texas Constitution. There- fore, only beer of an alooholic oontent not in excess of 3.2 per cent by~weight may be legally sold in Justice Precinct No. 5 of McLennan County, Texas. ATTORNEY GENH(AL CYM:rt:wb Assistant