Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

R-710 EA OWNEY GENERAL, TEXAS PRICE DANIEL AITcJR?iEY GENERAL August 14, 1947 Hon. Jos. B. Dart Opinion No. V-343 County Attorney Kendall County Re: Is the sheriff, assessor and Boerne, Texas collector to be considered as one office in interpreting H. B. 501, Ch. 204, 50th Legislature. Dear Sir: We refer to your letter of July 24, 1947, in which you requested an opinion of this Department, and in which the questions, we believe, msg be succinctly summarized as follows: Does H. B. 501 Chapter 204, Acts of the &kh Legislature 6. 3 1947, apply to counties having a poiulati;; of less than 10,000 inhabitants? 2. Are the offices of sheriff, assessor and collector of taxes to be considered one office in such counties? 3. Is the sheriff allowed his automobile expenses in such counties, when acting in the capacity of assessor and collector of taxes? House Bill 501, supra, is as follows: "Section 1. The County Commissioners Courts of this State are directed to supply and pay for transportation of sheriffs of their respective counties and their deputies to and from points within this State, under one of the four (4) following sections: "(a) Such sheriffs and their deputies shall be furnished adequate motor transportation in- cluding all expense incidental to the upkeep and operation of such motor vehicles. "(b) Motor vehicles shall be furnished to such,sheriffs and their deputies who may furnish gas and oil, wash and grease, incidental to the operation of such vehicles; for which gas and oil, wash and grease, such sheriffs and deputies shall Hon. Jos. B. Dart - Page 2 (V-343) be compensated at a rate not to exceed four cents (4#) per mile for- each mile such vehfcl8 is operated in the performance of the duties of his off ice. “(c) Alternatively such County Commissloners Courts mug allow sheriffa and their deputies in their respective countlea to use and operate cara on official busineaa which cars are personally owned by them for which such officers ‘shall be paid not less than six centa (6$) per mile nor more than ten cents (lO$!) per mile for each mile traveled ln the performance of offlclal duties of their offioe. “(d) All compensation paid under the pro- visions of this Aot shall be upon a sworn state- ment of euch sheriff. “Sec. 2, The fact there ia nov no adequate law providing transportation for sherifis and their deputlee in the enforcement of the laws of the’ State creates an emergency and e case of im- perative public necessity that the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several daya in each House of the Legialature.be suapend- ed, and said Rule is hereby suspended, and that this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after Its passage, and it la 80 enacted.” In view of the plain, clear, and unambiguous language in said Act, it is our opinion that the same applies to all oounties of this State, including those having a population of less than 10,000 inhabitants. .~ Ssotion 16 of Artiole VIII of the ConstitutLon is aa rollows : “The uherlff of eaoh oountg in additi.on to his other butlea ahall be the Assessor and Collec- tor of Taxes therefor; but, in oountles having ten thoulrand (10,000) or more inhabitanta, to be determined by the last preoedLng oenaua of the United Btstes, an Assessor and Colleator of Tax08 shall be eleoted to hold offloe for two (2) year8 ;Fedur$tfl his sucoesmortx shall be eleoted and quali- . Article 7246, V.C.S., 16 as follows: Hon. Jos. B. Dart - Page 3 (V-343) "In each county having less than ten thousand (10,000) inhabitants, the sheriff of such county shall be the Assessor and Collector of Tax,es,and shall have and exercise all the rights, powers and privileges, be subject to all the requirements and re- strictions, and perform all the duties imposed by law upon assessors and collectors; and he shall also give the same bonds required of an assessor and collector of taxes elected." We quote from Texas Jurisprudence, Volume 34, page 447, a8 follows: "In some instances a public officer, by virtue of the fact that he holds the office to which he was elected or appointed, or ex officio, is authorized and required to exercise the powers and perform the duties of another office. In such a case the Supreme Court has said that the powers and duties of the officer, simply as such, are just as distinct from his powers and duties when acting in his ex officio capacity as if they were exer$ised by two different persons. . . . . . In view of the above, we believe that the offices of sheriff and assessor and collector of taxes in counties of less than 10,000 population are to be considered as one office. But in such counties the sheriff Is acting in a dual capacity. For instance, this Department in Opinion No. O-1051 held that. where a sheriff collects taxes, he is not filling two offices, but the sheriff Is simply performing duties that he is not required to perform in counties containing more than 10,000 population. The opinion further held that the sheriff who performed the duties of assessor and collector of taxes ln counties having a population of less than LO,000 inhabltants was only entitled to draw the maximum fees allowed to the sheriff under the statutes. In answering Question No. 3, "whether the sheriff in such counties is entitled to automobile expenses when acting In the capacity of assessor and collector of taxes", we must look to Article 7246 and H.B. 501. It 1s apparentfrom the language in Article 7246, that the sheriff in counties with a populatlon of less than 10,000 inhabitants ls,to enjoy the rights and ~privilegesand perform all the duties imposed upon assessors and collectors. We fail to find any provision where tax assessors and collectors are allowed automobile expenses, while assessing taxes. - . Hon. JOS. B. Dart - Page 4 (V-343) It is true that under H.B. 501, the sheriffs in such countfes are allowed automobile expenses while in the perform- ance of~official duties. It ~111 be noted, however, in the $mergency clause of said Act, that It is for the purposes of providing transuortatlon for sheriffs and their deputies in the enforcement of the laws of the State." (Emphasis ours) We believe from the language used that clearly the Legislative intent was that this provision apply only to the sheriff when enforcing the law a~ sheriff, and not when he was assessing taxes. In view of the foregolng, you are respectfully ad- vised that it Is the opinion of this Department that the'sher- iff Is not allowed his automobile expenses under the provl- B. 501, supra, when acting in the capacity of as- sions of I-l. sessor and collector of taxes. SUMMARY 1. H. B. 501, Acts of the 50th Leg., R. S., 1947, which allows automobile expenses to sher- iff in the performance of his officlel duties, applies to all counties, -includingthose having a population of less than 10,000 inhabitants. 2; In counties of less than 10,000 popula- tion, the positions of sheriff and assessor end collector of taxes are considered es one office. 34 Tex. Jur. 447. 3. The sheriff is not allowed his automo- bile expenses in such counties when acting in the capacity of assessor and collector of taxes. Art. 7246, V.C.S.; H. B. 501, supre. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/Bruce Allen Bruce Allen Asslstant BA:djm:wc APPROVED: s/Fagan Dickson FIRST ASSISTANT