Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

R-313 April 16, 1947 Hon. Britton T. Edwards, Jr., Vice Chairman, Public Lands and Buildings Committee House of Representatives- 1 Austin, Texae Qpinion.No, . . V-149 :,.~., Re: Constitutionalityof H. B. 748 author- iz$ng the Commission- er'of Phe~.Glne& La&d Offiod to.exe- 0qt.eroya&ty oen- tract.son State land; authorizingadmini- .S,WSitiOl‘5 ereoutors iid guariiane.to maku agreements cov- ering oil,and.gas 'interretr'of es- tates; and the effect of such Act on the Stats's Antitrust Dear Sir, kwse. We bare,read your request for an Opinion, date&April 2, 1947, whioh reads aa fellows: "The'Committee on Public La&s and,Build- ings instructedme as Vice-Chairman,to,give H, B, 748 to you with the request that you give pus.anopinion on the constitutionalityof the measure,.a'ndits effect upon the Stateta Anti- trust laws,n 'Thetitlk,to'suchbill reads: "AN ACT authoriringthe Comz#ssionerof the General Land Office to execute con- tracts committingthe oil and gas interests of the State to lawful agreementswith the approval of the School Land Board if the oil and gas interests are set apart for Hon. Brltton T. Edwards, Jr,, PsgS 2, v-149 Permanent Free School Fund and the sev- eral asylum funds, and of the board, agent, agency or authorlt of the state vested with authority to L asc or approve the leasing of landsfor oil and gas in other lands or areas; authorizingadmin- istrators, executors,guardians, or other fiduciariesadministeringestates under control and jurisdictionof the County Courts to execute contracts committingto lawful agreementsthe oil and gas inter- eats of the estates with the approval of the County Courts; prohibitingthe execu- tion of contractswhich in any,manner vio- late the anti-trust law8 of this State; repealing all laws and parts of laws in conflict heretiith;providing a savings clause, and declaring an emergency.* The Constitutionof Texss, Art. III, Sec. 35 provides with exceptions not relevant here, t&t "No bili * *..*shalI contain more than one subject which shall be expressed in its title, * * rp*f+ In det~ermining whether the title to an Act embraces more than one subject the titb must be construedwith reference- the.iangusgeused in it alone, and not in the light of what the body of the Act cont&ins. >G Am, Jur, 173, Statutea, Ssc, 192. The title above quoted containstwo sub- jwts: (1) an Act to permitthe General Land Office to execute royalty contracts;and (2) an Act author- izing administrators,exeoutors, guardians and other fiduciariesto execute contracts cowitting to bw- ful agreementsthe eil and gas interests of estates. Since the title contains two subjects,the bills runs afoul of Art. III, Set, 35, above quoted, The title could be redrawn to correct the above defect. A suggestedtitle is herewith attachede The Bill otherwise is constitutional. The language used therein is extremely broad, and is not definite as to what type of contracts are included therein, It gives blanket authority9but it is be- lieved not to be so vague and indefinite as to be un- constitutional0 , . Hon. Britton Tc Edwards, Jr.,,Page 3, V-l49 The Bill is capable of a construction which would render it meaningless in that it simply authorizesthe persons named therein to make "lawful" agreements on the subjects stated. These people are already authorizedto make agreementswhich it is* lawful for them to make. Given such construction, the bill would add nothing to their pcwerss Since this biI1 is lifted almost verbatim from Sections 2 and 3 of H. Be 67, it is presumed that the intent of the bill is to permit the persons named therein to enter into pooling agreements,when and if such agreementsare lawful. But that intent doesn't appear from this Bill itself. That part of Section One (line II) which particularizesthe water-coveredlands covered, omits inland lakes. The Bill further omits specific ref- erence to State lands inside the tidewater limits, which are leased by other authority than the Relin- quishment Act. H. B. 748 is broad enough to authorize the Commissionerof the General Land 0fflce.t.oexecute agreements on University of Texas lands, with the approval of the Board of Regentso The present law authorizingthe Stateto pool its interests in gas fields specificallyprovides: nexcept leases cov- ering iands belonging to The University of,Texasn,* General Laws 1945, 49th Leg, R.S., ch. 309, p. 507, Sec. I, being Art, 5368b,V.C.S, The same Act above referred to requires the retention by the State of a minimuznroyalty* R. B. 748 omits this provision. All of the above items are pointed out in case you intend to offer amendments to cure any of such matters. Because of Section 3 of the Bill, stating that none of the persons named In the Bill are auth- orizedto execute any agreement which would violate the Antitrust laws, the BiIl in no way endangersthe antitrust laws of this State0 SUMMARY . The Title to H, B. 748, authorizingthe Hon. Britton T. Edwards, Jr,, Page 4, V-149 Commissionerof the General Land Office to exe- cute lawful oil and gas royalty contracts,and authorizingadministrators,executors, guardians and other fiduciariesto execute agreements con- cerning oil or gas interests in estates com- mitted to their charge,~'~~is defective in that it containsmore thanfone~subjectr Constitution ef Texas, Art. III, Sec:35. The Bill is otherwise constitutional,andwlll have no ef- fect on the antitrust laws of this state. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS w Joe R, Greenhill Assistant v-149 AN ACT authorizing.theCommissionerof the General Land.Office,Administrators;Executors,Guard- ians, and other fiduciaries,to commit certain oil and gas interestswithin their charge, to lawful agreements;prescribingthe procedure therefor; setting out the approval required therefor* and providing for other conditions surroundIng the execution of such agreements; prohibitingthe execution of contractswhich in any manner violate the antitrust hws; re- pealing all laws and Parts of laws in conflict herewith; providinga saving clause,and de- claring an emergency*