Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN the cxsqtion fQ ths rreord rrquasted ulthoat yqpmmt ot the rtatutery iam thsmmr. w desn it wlnra~MFf te sst forth !MFrb tbs 1rn$thy pOTiEiXI8 Of th8 Canttary Code rrleting to Tit81 rtatirtior. .% !lUlU FU$SWrd, bCJW6WF,Oh484 FUlW . RUb 3&+a of Arti un ve;midS xoROt0tUd Civ%&Gt8tutu8 - and find n0 SUi89tiOIlfB&F ntrloh ~~SQBt Ot thhr 8t8tUtOP~ frcl rpst be ?iUiYUd. 9 u lug & ao f r a idlta tutm prmldse ?or thr isas to ba oovlu, sl$o @ovidlag. that the E?UQ and co?l!Aatacootmt oi SIJ ix884 for th8 pU?pO84 ot dfmhping cx~enrss inuurrad in tbo mafeo88aant and opurrtlon of the Vital Statttior h6t. Th18 d6p6rtRQBt hcl8 b8d OOOU;ri(Pt0 OPFdilly F'ntiUW tha twrty to ,rjhioh pm rater, a 0099 or nhioh aooampaaim paP mlqt’.ut. %mu wu8 ratltird La a proslmetion by the i%8idtUIt. Or the %IitWi sktta8, UiiO8titII JUb 1, 1943, whuro %n the artlolos O? t&u eac.ltantioa,14 la aueber, worm 86t fOrthe hPtiole III, Psrapaph I of 8aid cmrontion, provideat “Consular affioors anad aployQer in a orram- late; O? th eSta te8r r h la tlw artionalu h y a x*lp p lnt66, aad not rag8gs$ la -01 pzlratr oaoupatlon fOF $8iR within thti aO?FitOFt bi @‘a Stat8 in d&hid3 thaf rrareltar thair iUSIOtbB8~ mhall k srampt from all tuu, Watlonal, Ststa, ?rorlwlal and URlnloLpel, lnoltwllDgtale8 of teu, waga OF U18Pi.8 raoaircd lpa8ffla~l~ in aewpauatlon fa aaasolar sorvloae, arut they 8b11 be QXQm9t irOr all kb&O at nhaFgO@ iRQid@Bt t0 thQ lf8QfiliiD&$, rQgiSt~0tiIXl, 1188 OF OiFOIlhtiPa Of VUhtObb. kb#V’SP, thal dt811 EOt be uma hm taxurlstled t on rooomb of the yossama ! 011 or OnnaFehip of bmovnb1.u FPOpJFtp sitwtad tithln thrr territory o? the Xste in r-oh they axarCt8u their fUnQtriclll8 OP tUXU levied against LnOma durivad iTOe%rWap6PY Oi my kiti zituated. within saoh tsrrltory or 8.0 loll&ng th4rato." .