Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE ATTO~~-EY GENERAL OF TEXAS Hbnorable J. P. Gibbs, Commlssfoner Casualty InsuranceDivision Board of Insurance Commlssloners Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Gibbs: Opinion No. 0-5896 Re: Whether tinemployee of the State Insurance Commission,who performs certain'dutiesworking full time, as required by law, in that particular posltlon may draw compensationfrom the State for this additionalwork before or after the hours he works in the regular position. You vrite us as follows: "In my department, I am confrontedwith a very serious problem in that after March 1, 1944, at least one of the members of my technical staff in a key position will no longer be with me because he is entering the armed services. For quite sometime, it has been a real problem for my small department to operate and try to supervise as Is required by law. The casualty business during the past year amounted to ap- proximately $~O,OOO,OOO in the State of Texas. Even In ordinary times, it was difficult to find available men qualified in actuarial science. It is absolutely impossible, insofar as I can determine, for me to obtain anyone qualified in this particular field of insurancewhLch is ab- solutely essential to the performanceof the requirements Imposed upon my department by lav. "To give you a very specific case, the Read Of my Automobile Insurance Sectlon, besides his actuarial capacity, must have the ability to know contracts and be.able to,draw up instruments to afford coverage required by the policyholders who pay normally $30,000,000 in automobile Ln- surance premiums. This department,as you know, la required to prescribe standard policy forms Honorable J. P. Gibbs - page 2 0 -5896 for vorkmen's compensationand automobile lnsur- ante together vlth all the endorsementsto be used In connectionvith the writing of such business. We now have more than 200'endoMement forms &lone In the Automobile Insurance Section. Th6 Head of' that section has been called Into the armed services, and I have pledged niyvora, as has been done by . business and governmental Institutionsgenerally, to bald the~posltlotisfor the boys -enteringthe armed services In order that they might occupy such positions If and when they return. To my way of thinking,taking these boys back Into their - positionswhen they return Is a fundamentalAmer- ican prlnclple. "The members of my technical staff during the last year particularlyhave worked falthfnllyand dlllgently to perform the duties required. This serious problem presents to me the questlon of whether I can pay the present Head of the Workmen's Compensationtechnical staff who Is highly quall- fled for either of these two key positions part of the salary appropriated for the Director of Auto- mobile Insurancebased on the number of overtime hours he puts In on this job and at the same time pay him the full amount of the appropriationfor the job he occupies principallyas Chief Actuary of the Workmen's CompensationSection to which he would give at least eight hours per day of his services. "Section15(b) of the current appfoprlatlon bill ,(Senate Bill 332) passed by the last session of the Legislature Is somewhat ambiguous. I should like, therefore, for you to advise me on the fo.l- loving question: "Could an employee vho performs a cer- tain duty and working the full time as re- quired by law In that particularposition draw compensationfor this additionalwork after or before the hours he vorks In the ~~. regular posltlon? The additionalvork per- formed after hours Is not In line vlth his regular work. _. “AS this Is a very urgent and importantmatter, I~res~ectfullyrequest your opinion at an early date. 2 , . Honorable J. P. Gibbs - page 3 O-5896 Section 33 of Article XVI of the Constitutionreads In part as follows: "The accounting officers of this State shall neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the Treasury In favor of any per&on, for salary or compensa- tlon as agent, officer or appointee,vho holds at the same time any other office or position of honor, trust or profit, under this State or theme United States, except as prescribed In this Con- stitution.* 4 4 4 4.” We think your question construed In the light of the specific Illustrationglven by you, should be answered ln the negative. The director and actuary of your Motor Vehicle Insur- ance Section (Item 26 In the current approprlatloiibill) un- doubtedly is anagent or appointee,within the meaning of Sec- tion 33, above quoted whose compensationIs fixed In the appropriationact at $4000.00 per annum. The other position mentioned by you, the head of the Workmen's Ctimpensationtechnical staff -- actuary and chief clerk -- is lIkewIse a position as an agent or appointee, '- whose compensationIs fixed at $4000.00 per annum by the ap- proprlatlonact, and both are positions of honor, trust and profit. So that It would follow perforce of the express terms of the Constitutionthat one occupying either of these posi- tions would be forblaaen to receive compensationfrom the State for services performed in the other. In truth, vhlle occupying both position8 he could be paid for neither. The situation and principle here dlsciissedhas been thus stated by First Assistant Attorney General, C. U. Cureton, afterward Chlef Justice of the Supreme Court, as follows: "An analysis of the above quoted section of the Constitutionresults In the following: That the accounting officers of this State are prohibited from drawing or paying a warrant upon the treasury In favor of any person for (a) salary, (b) compensation;as (1) agent, (2) officer; (3) appointee, lf such person at the same time holds any other (1) offlce, 2 position of honor, (3) position of trust, or II 4 posltlon of proflt, under this State or the United States. "Mr. Uayes Is the Lieutenant-Governorof this State, and under the Constitutionas above quoted Honorable J. P. Glbbs - page 4 0 -5896 and discussed that la an office. It is llkevlse a position of honor and trust, and while It could hardly be said, owing to the very nominal salary paid, that It Is a position of profit, yet there 1s a compensationattached to the office of Lleu- tenant-Governor,which, be It great or small, Is Intended as.8 remunerationfor the time devoted to the office. "It is very clear, therefore, that &.. Hayes, so long as he is Lieutenant-Governor,could not under the Constitutiondraw pay from the State, ,a~~:;)agent, (2) officer, (3) appointee of the . "As we have above endeavored to show that a professor In the University of Texas is an ap- pointee, or lnallmltea sense an agent, there- fore, Mr. Mayes could not draw a salary from the State as Professor of Journalism in the University. "The converse of the above proposition Is also true, and, therefore, Mr. Mayes, so long aa he was the agent or appointee of the State as a Professor of Journalism in the University, could not draw his pay as Lieutenant-Governorof the State, that being an office within the meaning of the Constitution. "Therefore,should Mr. Mayes accept the posl- tlon of Professor of Journalism in the University and at the same time hold and exercise the duties of the office of Lieutenant-Governor,he could not draw pay for either such office o* such posl-. tlon." -- Opinions of Attorney General 1912-1914, p. 880. Further analyzing the Constitutionand expounding its meaning as to those servants of the State coming within its scope, that opnlon declares: "The State can only act through representatives, and such representativesare divided Into tvo classes primarily. The first class Is that of officers,who may be either elected by a Vote of 'thepeople or re- ceive their commissionsby appointment by virtue of some provision of the Constitution or statute,who .-,. take the oath of office and are generally required to enter Into bond for the faithful performanceof their duties 1 and such other obligationsas~;are Honorable J. P. Gibbs - page 5 O-5896 Imposed by the statute and who exercise some func- tion of government. "The second class In the broader sense des- ignates all other servants of the government as employees of the government or some of its agencies or lnstltutlons, who hold their position by reason of contract made and entered Into by and 'between such person and some officer or agent of the State government who 1s authorized or directed to make such contract by some provision of the Constltu- tlon or statutes of the State. Such employee takes no oath and executes no bond and may be discharged at the pleasure of the appointing power. The tenure of his position Is fixed by the con- tract made and entered Into between such employee and the appointing power, or It may terminate according to the contract at the pleasure of the appointing power. "Under one or the other of the above two classifications a professor in the University must fall; that is, he must either be an officer of the State or he must be an employee, and we will now direct our attention to fixing the status of a professor aspone or the other." -- Opinions of Attorney General 1912-1914, p. 874. That opinion has often been cited and quoted, and ve think It represents the true construction of the Constitution. We appreciate the stress of present conditions as ft. ~affects the admlnlstratlon of the affairs of your department, -to be sure, but exigencies of whatever magnlttiaewill not justify vlolatlon of a plain constitution. Very truly yours ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEKAS OS-MR-WC BY s/Ocle Speer Oole Sp6er Assistant APPROVED MAK8, 1944 s/Gee. P. Blackburn Acting--ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Approved Opinion Committee By s/BwB Chairman