Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN .. Uonorqble &eo Preonell Cglnt~ Attorney Upshur'Couilty ullmer, Texas _ .Deu- A&r.Preeuell: 8s ..metup tar.the ‘men 0’ ret -- a-..-‘A _. and basad,upon &he sasiescheilPl9as'set up for the payment oi said'off$oer~ dqri.ngthe $*erioue year of 1943.’ "1. Does the Counf$ Auuai+ have the legal authority under the Lilnuteabove';ketout to apprwe rsr- :iant,sthat tight.be issued by~.~he~CountyOlerk in payment of monthly salaries due to-each 6f the folloring named county oificiale: County Judge, BheriPf, Assessor and 6onorable Leo Presnell - page 2 Collector of Taxes, County Clerk, Matrict Clerk, County Treasurer and County Attorney? = l2. In the event one of the above named eleo- tire county offioials is nor a Prlvate la the Marine Corps of the United Ytatea Armed Foraes, and, assuming that the ,abovenamed minute is in all thingi a legal minute to di- reot the County Clerk to issue varrants for monthly salar- ies, rould It still be legal for the County Auditor to ap- prove the minute that might be issued to the eleotlve pub- lic official serving in the armed foraest l3.Xf'the above mentioned Minute as passed by the ConmissIoners Court should bqmade more spealfic under .&tiale 3612 in that the eleotive county offiaials are named and the amounts of monthly aalarles stipulatedin the hlnute, and assum@@ that the monthly salary of the above mentioned member of the armed forces 6hOuid be so specifIcally stipulated, would the County Auditor still have the right to approve samete lieanswer your question MO. 1 in the lfffrmatire. The set-out minute or order df your QdPnriasloners*Court tlearly sbors an intention of the~oourt to authotiae for the ourrent year the payment of the amae-amount ol.salar- &es to such eleot~Ve oounty'off~olal~ as rae luthoriaed for the preceding year of 1946. lf the'order passed in .1943 was a valid one, then the one in question fs also valid. Certainly, the current ord.erdoer not chae;e iw the preeeding~order, and even if 'therehad been ~~lvodify no order pasmxl for the ourrent year, your auditor would be authorized to approve varrants issued under the author- ity of the preoed$ng year's order orminute. This rule is'stated in Vol. a&, Texas WrlsprudeiIoe, p. 566, 8s follower l& order fixing the amount which is not changed or modified ,oontj,nues in effeot and Is controlling for the sueaeedlng year.. Our answer to your question 80. 2 is also in the afftinative, and in support thereof, we hereto attach our Opinions Has. o-6688, O-3448, O-4893, O-6017, o-6, and O-6098. In so ansveriag thi.8qtxestion es assume you meant 214 flonorableLeo Presnell - page a srarrantP instead of *minute", where you say, ..,. . WOUHI It still be legal for the County Auditor to ap- prove the minute that might be Issued to the eleetire public official serving in the armed forcest* The abwe also answers your question Ilo.3. Very truly yours ATTOHPEX GlWItUL OF T-8 -Wobt. L. Libttlmore,Jr. i Asalstant iXEYGFSERALOF!C @?I