Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Heaerable 3. A. Belger. page 2 -- Wo hwe carefully ccuuidcred Article 39l20,Vernon’s An- aoWed Civil Statutw, ia c oxmectionwHhyfmrrequ8standfailtofind any provi8ioa ln said etatute autboriaing tbe Commis&merc’ Court of Travis County to aUw any expenses to the Diotrict Attorney of uld cwnty. However, there are certain provisions of arid statate author- i&g theComxnhioners* Court8 ofvarious countleoto dlw certaki aapauos to DWrid or Criminal District Attorney& However. as above dated, we fail to fhd any provhion of said lBt8ti applicable to Travim cormty. gection 3 of Article 3899b. Veramu’s Annotated Civil sbtutac. ruthori888 the Gommksioners’ Courts of certain camties to allow cer- tab apauea to Strict or Criminal District Atforneyu. This provimiou ot the foregoing statute is not applicable ta Travis County. Arti& 322, Vernon% Annotated CfvU Statutea, among other th@s,lprerides that the 5Srd Judicial District of Travis ?Zounty&hall elect a DWrict Attorney. Article8 S26k*0 md tZ6a. ~ernoa’s Ann&&d Civil Shtutur are q&cable to Travis County. titeBill No, 100, Acts of the 47tkkgialature. Rqplar &srfos, 194l# rmandtpd: 5udli4~of Ar- t&b tt(m, Ve@in’s Annot8ted Gi*s1 statutor,;uaory other things, pro- *a1 ~HOnowb~ J.A. Belgor, @go t