Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

;-. . OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN , / Honorable II.A. Hodges County Auditor WIlliamson County Georgetown,Texas Dear Sir: of your letter of re- cent date reque department upon the above stated an quote from your letter as follows: ed to you for an opin- and several of the Rules K. Doak of Taylor, Texas, r of Births and Deaths by ealth and approved by the the City Clerk of s Registrar. The ty with Ei'popula- through June, his bill each amount due him ime he registered 1135 births and deaths for a total considerationof $566.50. Dr. Doak has submitted to the Commissiohers Court of Williamson County a bill for $566.50, under date of August 26, 1943, and a certified copy from Dr. W. A. Davis, State Registrar of Vital Statistics, certifyingthe number of births and deaths for each month from June, 1941, through June, 1943. This Is Honorable ,H.A. Hodges, page 22 the first demand made by Dr. Doak for the payment of these Birth and Death Certificatesover the period from June 17, 1941, through June, 1943. "Dr. Doak, at the end of ea,chmonth, from June, 1941,~throughJune, 1943, submittedhis bill to the City of T@lor and this bill was paid promptly by the City of Taylor. "The city of Taylor does not have any ordinance providing for the Clerk or Secretary for the City of Ta lor to perform the duties of Registrar. In June, 19f1, the City Clerk of Taylor reflsed to act as local Registrar a,ndthe State Board of Health, with the approval of the Mayor, appointed Dr. ,Doakas the 1 Local Registrar. "Dr. Doak has been paid by the City in full and is now requestingthe County to pay him for the same Certificatesfor which the City has already paid him. It is the understandingbetween Dr. Doak a.ndthe City of Taylor that If the County pays Dr. Doak the $566.50 he will endorse the check to the City and the money will be deposited to the credit of the City of Tay- lor. It is further to be observed that Dr. Doak in performingthe duties of Local Registrarhas each month, from June 17, 1941, through June, 1943, send a copy of the Birth or Death Certificatesto the County Clerk for recording as provided by 1a.w. “The two questions which I would like for YOU to answer are: "'Is Williamson County, under the above statement of facts, liable to Dr. E. K. Doak the Local Regis- trar, duly.appointedby the City of Taylor~,for Birth and Death Certificates,prepared by him and forwarded to the County Clerk of Williamson County from June 17, 1941, through June, 19431' "Under the above statement Of facts, is Wllllam- son County liable to the City of Taylor for the Certl- ficates which the City of Taylor paid Dr. Doak for re- cording during the period from June 17, 1941, through June, 1943?~" Honorable H. A. Hodges, page 3 Rule 53a of Article 4477, Vernon’s Texas Civil Stat- utes, provides as follows: “That each Local Registrar shall be,paid the sum of Fifty (50) Cents for each birth and death certi- ficate properly and completelymade out a.ndregister- ed.wlth him, and correctly recorded and promptly re- turned by him to the State Bureau of Vital Statistics, as required by this Act, unless such Local Regis- trar shall be acting as Registrar of Birth and Deaths in an incorporatedcity where the compensationof the RegSstrar is otherwise fixed by city ordinance. “The State Registrar shall annually certify to the,County CommissionersCourt orCountyAuditor, as the case may be, the number of birth and death certi- : ficates filed by each Local Registrar at the rate fixed,herein,and provided that the State Registrar ’may renderssuch statementsmonthly or quarterly,at the discretionof the State Board .ofHealth, and the CommissionersCourt or County Auditor, as the case may be, shall audit such statementsand the County ’ Treasurer shall peg such fees as are approved by the CommissionersCourt or the County Auditor, at the time such statement Is issued. “And provided further, thatthe Justice of the Peace, City Clerk or Secretary,and the appointed Local Registrar shall submit to the Commissioners Court or County Auditor, as the case may be, a true s.ndaccurate copy of each birth and death certificate filed with him, and such copies shall bear his,file date and signatureand shall be deposited in the County Clerk% office. The County Clerk shall be paid for indexing and preserving such records, such compensationas may be agreed upon by the Commlsslon- ers Court.” This department in Opinion Ros. O-3874 and O-4583, copies of which are’enclosedherewith for your convenience,ren- dered~its opinion as to the’proper constructiont0 be placed UP- on the above quoted rule of Article 4477, supra. As pointed out in these enclosed opinions the county, In the absence of a city Honorable H. A. Hodges, page 4 ordinance providing for compensationof these local registrars, was the political subdivisionliable for payment of the prescrib- ed fees of such registrars. The city of Taylor accordign to the informationfur- nished us had not passed an ordinanceproviding for compensa- tion of Its local registra.r.Therefore, from June, 1941, to June, 1943, the local registrar could not have legally demanded payment of his fees from the City of Taslor and upon such a presentationof his claim the city could have rightfully turned itdown. The registrar could have, however, by performinghis duties in accordance to the a~ppropriateprovisionsof Article 4477, supra, lawfully demanded payment of his claim for fees from Williamson County, since the county was actually Indebted for the performanceof these services. The query then arises whether or not the fact the City oftTaylor did pay for the ren- dition of these services by the local registrar seemingly out of its own volition alters the situation in any wa.y. The Texas courts have held that pa.ymentof an obliga- tion by a third party, although without the debtor's request, if accepted as such by the creditor,dischargesthe obligation so far as the creditor Is concerned. Holland v. De Walt, 223 3. W. 217, writ of error dismissed;General Banking and Casual- ty Ins. Co. v. Moseley, 174 S. W. 1031, reversed on other grounds, 110 Tex. 529, 222 S. W. 961. According to the facts furnished us, It cannot be tenably contended thatthe local registrar did not accept the fees from the City of Taylor in full and complete payment for the serviceshe rendered in that capacity. The registrar cou,ldnot now present hisclaim to Williamson County and contend It was due and unpaid when In fact he had been fully compensatedtherefor. Thus, so far as Williamson County and the local registrar are concerned,any obligationexisting between them has been extinguishedand complete- ly discharged. We further do not believe the City of Taylor has any claim against Williamson County for paying these fees. As pointed out, the citY could by ordinancebe liable for these fees. The only claim the city could have would be by subroga- tion; that is, claim any rights the registrar ma,yhave had against the county. It is well settled that the doctrine of subrogationmay not be Invoked by a mere volunteerwho has paid an obligationof another without a legal obligationto do SO .-. . ’ . Honorable H. A. Hodges, page 5 and an absence of compulsionor to protect an existing right. Houston v. Shear, 210 3. W. 976, 'writof error dismissed;First National Bank and Trust Co. v. Vordeman, 188 3. w. 695, af- firmed 221 S. W. 685; Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas v. Smylie, 134 S. W. (26) 838. The City of Ta,ylorvoluntarilypaid the local registrar without a legal obligationto do so, was not forced to do so by compulsion,nor to protect any existing right. In other words, the city vo)untarll~paid the registrar in the true sense that the word 1s used. It is therefore the opinion of this department that Williamson County is not liable to the local registrar or the City of Tagldr for re lstratlon fees accruing between June 17, 1941, and June 30, 19&3, but will be liable to the local regis- trar for fees accruing after June 30, 1943. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS BY Robert'?%% . Assistant ROK:db Enclosures APPROVED OCT. 5, 1943 /s/ Grover Sellers FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENEiRAL APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE By /s/ B. W. B., Chairman