Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honora bla Frank 11. Vanor ,County Attornay Medfna County Bondo, Taxar Dear Sir: YOU r~pum ror raoelvsd ?&d oaro- fully oonsldsrad by this de ta rrom your I-e- quest a8 follows: to a 016 r0r hold- an In- quest aa pro 0r cod* 0r Criminal Pro the jurtlco or mean8 0r travel to ts tha oomtable to %dra ror paying a physlolan ii proridriror a ohrmloal analysis ausa of death. Also, the law uetlor may subpoena ritnrsaer and sndanaa and indimctly this would ramno* or a poaar olf~loer to SWVI aubpoems, enioror ordrr, oto. at suoh hsar- fns8 “The justlor of tha pram puts in hla bill for 85.00 to the CommlasIonerr* Court and tha oon- stable prrsrnts hIa bill also ror $3.00 he his tea. Xould thr Cocaslsalonerr~ Court ba authorlzad In paying tha oonrtablr ~hargr?~ Ron. Frank X. Vano8, pega 2 Artlolra 1053 and 1054, Vernon’s Annotatad Texas Codr of Crlmlnel Frocrdurr , road as follara: “Art. 1053. (1156) (11111 Inuusst ror “A justice of the Maor shall br entitled, ior an inquest, cn a drad body, Inoludfng orrtl?rIng end returning the prooradlng to tha proper oourt, tha 8ucn of fir8 dollars, to bs pald by the County, Khan an Inquert la held over tha -dead body of a State psnIt*ntlary oonrlat, th4 State ahall pay the Inquest lees allonsd by law of all officers, upon thr approval of the account therefor by the commlsaicuars oourt of the oounty I&which th8 in- quest may be held and the aapsrlntrn~snt of prnl- tsntiarle 9. (AotS 1876, pa 291; AOta 1883; pe 39; Act6 ht c. s, 1917, p. 52,) “Art. 1054.’ (1157) (1112) Fag ror lnqueat *?.ny ofricer claIm.Ing pay for serriora man- tloned in the prsordlng artlole ahall present to the commissioners court of the oountf, at a regu- lar tsm or suoh oourt, an aocount thrsror, verl- fisd by the arridarlt or’suoh olaimant. Ii auoh aocount b.0 found oorrrot th oourt shall order a tirt to issue upon tha oounty treasurer In iaocr of auoh claimant ior the amount due him. Suoh account shall he. filed and kept in thr Off100 of the oLunty clrrk,’ ConstruIn& Artlolq 1.053, V1 A.. C. C. P., this dr- partint bald In an opinion written by Honorable Samoa N. Naff, dated February 15, 1938, noorded In Vol. 380, pagr 187, Latter Opinions of the Attorney General of Taxer, that tha justlor of the peace was riot entitled to any allama for going to thm place or inquest. In other words th8 $5.00. r4e 15 ror all or his servloea. X0 hat0 oarefully sxaalnod the atatatra and are un- abla to find any statute authorlzlw or providing any oharaotrr or fee or fees for a oonatable In Inquest pmoeedlngs. An Inquart Is nslthar orImInaJ. nor a oIvI1 oaae. It is a I)peoIal statutory proorrdlng. No achrdulr or rear for oon- stable8 In Inquest prooredlnga Is set up by tha ltatutoae Eelthor tha irea all0wrd oanatablra In criminal oases nor in civil 08~~s are applloablo to tha aWOIa1 statutory PrOCO4d- Ing or an inquast, Hon. Frank X. Vanoa, page 3 Artlolo 1011, Vernon*s Annotated Texas Code of Cria- Inal Froordurr, pr ovldsa that *no Itam of ooat shall be taxed for purported aerrloe which ma not performed, or for a service for whlah no far la axpraarly provided by law,” SInoa no far Is rxprrasly provided by law ror oon- stables In Inquestprooeadlnga It is our oplnlon that the oon- atabla would not be rntltled to any ima whatarer and that the co.mlaaIonrra~ court of your oounty la-not authorlzrd to the bill aubmittra by the oonatablr or any part thOIUOr~ Yours vary truly A’PT(iFUGY G3KSNAi OF TZ4S Bi (s) Sm. J. %nnIq Aaaietant ::'JF:X ViJF:pO AFPROVlEDJUL 2, 1943 (a) Wm. J. Fanning (Aoting) ATTORNEY C3XittiL OF TEXAS AEPROWD OPINION CGMXITTXB sp (9) IYiiB, CEAlRkfAM