Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

476 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Eonorrblo U. A. Davis State Rs~lrtrer ya~staa~"" of Nealth . rder frsued by the Judm of the ~rob ) of Jefferaozl CO-r, Alabama, trar of VlWl ~t~tistlcs of the to lfmw a a0rtl.f opinion as to IN ~2x3FROBAZ'ECOORTOP TEN COUNTY OF JzppIa3Ol4 STATE OF ALL “az IT REImLRRD, On this tha 1 day C’;*!$ l!& c- on to be heard the pdtitlon Of il f U-Ed Gambrel , for Itrave to obtain o?%& Court ==ixiiGr) an Order authorixlng the lssuanoe of d wrtified OoPY Ronorable W. A. Davis, wage 2 or the birth certificate of Honw Lee Gambrel ‘Iciocnty)(Stt I and that such oc%Led mf-%otber copy be delivered to of child) Jesrfe E. Gambrel , Bessemer. Ala.. lit= N r 1 IPost Office Addrasa) -55: _BOX pQr=on . *Af%er heorln& the potitlon, and the svldsncr in sup- port thereof, the court is or the opinion that aa should be granted. "It! ISTEREiKiRB, GRDERBD,ADJUD3EDAIiDDECRi3RDthat a CWtiiied 00 r Of the birth COPtliiG&tO 4bOVO WWd be issued by t L State Registrar of Vital Statirtica, Au&in, Texas, to the rnld Henry Lee Qambrel . (slnnad) B. a, xoum Udg3Ofth Proi3atd Court BesseemorDlVlSlon mu) JefSsrson county, Ala." Paragraph 25 of Rule 47a, Artlole 4477, Veamn*a Amm- -ted Civil statutes, reads as follovst "And provided that the name of the father or arq l,r&o~t by which he might be ldontified shall not be vritten into the birth or derth oertiflcate or nny lllegitaato child, and provldod further, that Say stattment the Sather of sn IUegltbats ohlld vish,hcatoe OII to its parentqp, may, v&a plaOsd in the torn of an sltidavit, be ettaOhtN.tO the Ori- -1 birth rooord. rkmhw the gtbte Baglstrar nor "lp local r&st,rar shall issue a c.ertlfled OORPof -Y birth or death certificate wherein a child Or @k adult is stated to be lllegitintate, unless such o&i- fled cop1 la ordered by a oourt Of OOnQetOntjui8- notion. Ii the Judge of the Probate Court of Jefferson County, u4b’-, had authorlt~ to order the State Registrar or vital 'trt18tlCa to issue 8 cortlfiad copy OS 8 btrth Oertificste of &morablu K. As ikWl8, 3TQ8 3 l person born LA Texas, Lt was under the tert48 oi Aztlols IV, 3ectioA 1 of the Conrtltution of tho (Inited State6, vhioh reads 46 ruz~2ows g %llFaith and Credit shall be given in each Stats Aots, Rcoord6,aAd Jtullclal irocosd- to public bxgn of ever7 otrhez-Stated Aruf the Congress may by gsnoral Laus prracribe the LWumr ln rhloh ruoh Aots, Reoordo and Proceedl.ngr sk41 be proved, skd the ES- teat ChweOS~ The Supreme Court of the United State6 la Calr VS. cumbgh8r~, 133 P. a. 107, at pge 112, 33 L. m. 5Si, 541, 30 3up. Ct. 8, 269, 270, rsidr *The Constitution dLd not m(1a~to ootlrer say new potter on tha rtrtoe, but simply to regulate the effect of their acktaovledgsd JurLsdfctLoa OYOFper- SOJWand things vithlo their terrftory. It did not snake the ,hidgments of 6tatei domestlo judgment6 to all intents and gurpoa~~, but only gave B general WlidLty, faith and orcdlt to t&m ab 8vldcmb). IL10 exeautlon can be issued upon such juil@IeAta Ylthout 4 Aetusuit in tha tribunals of other atEIte6, @xl they enjoy not the right of wlorl.ty or privilege Or lla, vhioh they hevein the state vhere they am ~~OAOUAO~~, but th8t Onty UhLChthe lei fOri givf$S to then by 1te own lawa, in tholr cha.raot8r or ford@3 jIld@MAtS." =issaQ¶r ’ ~‘Thhoaeprovisl0~6 s?tabUrrb a rule Of aviduAce rather than of jurrodLctloaa. UhiZe th.sy make the reoord of 8 judgmnt rondared after due aotio8 ln cane state POZYJ~US~VO midon in the oourts 0r aaothsr state or or the uAit6d Statal OS the mtter adjudged, thay do Aot rtfeot the jurlsdlotion, either of the cow in uhloh the judgmmontir residerod or of tho cou% in vh.iah it is ofiezad in eviSeno4. JudopleAts r~o~vtW%din On%.St&ttr of thb UnitXI, vh@A pNvUd ti the oourts of roother go~erA.wmt, whether state os A~tio&el, wlthFn the Fnlted Status differ fron judg- PreAtt raoovered in a foceitya ocmtry in AO other ., .’ xmofabla Y. A. J&vie, pa@ 4 respect than iA AOt -iloi~X$$ re-o%aznl.nable On their mrits nor impeachable r0r fraud ia obtabtw thm, if rendered by a court having $.wlsdfctlonof th% cause and of the partlor.’ Ths Supreme Court of deorgla saldc “tits Clause (full faith aab oredit) i5 AO~ to bo reosived 91 t&a fullest Import of the terms. It 18 referebla to such records, eta*, a8 plead- bgs and evLdeno0. AAY other cbnstructioc, myth would give the sama offect to 6 t’~r*i&i ju aa to our OVA, vould fndoed ba CQ gire .&hadp” ” of’ wa one state complete OperatSan in another * would be to strka a Judgment la ona state bind prc-prty In another. ’ Joioe v. Scales, l8 Ga. 725, 23 Cyc, Lav, ad POW., pp* 1545, 1546, 1556, 155?, 23 L. R. A. (x. 3.) The Probate Court of Alabam did not have Juriudla- tb~ ti oae of the Farties affected by the Judgmnt vltA vhloh VO UO here ooncernod, ‘fill. Dr. !i. A, DtbVi8, Stat6 ~OalfbtrU Of Vital Statiatioe of Texas, imd said court had no paver to oz’der hb tc psrlorm arty sot. The Judgnmnt of the Probate Court of - could 0dy be uaod as eviden40 ia a oourt Er wmpatent &Udiction vlthia this State, and said latter court vould Cave to anter a Judgment ordering the State Roi;lstrar to is.aue l certifl?d COPY of i$e birth certlffcato of &my Lee Oa?nbFeZ, bafom the State RegSStrac would have authorltg to lasue such ‘-=hXod copy. It 1s therefore our OpiAiOA that tha Judge Qf the Probate COW., Euseemer Di~f~i0~, of Jefferson County, Alabaua, 1a vithout authority to order the State Re@atrar of Vital 3tatwi05 to issue a asrtltled. aopp or the birth aertif‘ioate Or Rmrr Lee cmbrel, ad& the State Registrar is vlthout author- ltr to 18)sW such csrtlflad oopy upon the OrCer of said court. Ye are horcvlth returning to you the J@mnt abovo wotec. Very truly yours ATToRmY0ENmAL w TW