Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFF’ICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN L : Boaorabh R. B. Ritohsy, Jr. County Attorney Jasper County Jasper, IPera8 Cplnlon 30. 0.4272.: R61 IO the oounty attkrnsyantltled to reo4:v4..10%~pomlM~on QD Q rin0 pf@ in ‘Ebb db38riOt oourt by defetiU~~% in n oantenptgro- oee&lng oaae GRinw defendant had~violatsd an lniunoB$on 4s jblniiig her froa ~~911~~ liquor or utefnd her prenlaeo for thst I’ ptipP#? ‘: dqxmt- mot on'th4 above ateted quee‘tion.irqada68 rollows: . ing4~oats0*me U4k~br&ont'~@b oioldted~~en~~in- junoflon enJeinlng her '%mc&,sel2in(t~llq$?r, ox uufng her ppi%&wq ,.-., for @iat.;purpooe? .. ,;' *&$bh 95b c~~'pro~iues~ The UXitriot # om$y’ attorzmf,#+ll be entibled ,to t4n p4z foe& or oLt/r,lmu~ fcMelture8 or a0luys ~ollsa8- .. : aa ;rar theC.,Std*aor oountp, upon .+Upibn8i1 ro- 'yv"y bT 45; : * I ~~.~~~~'J~lspr~d~n84, Vol 15, pam W2, says, ffi p~OV~&XI~of the ofxle of crhlxml prooeeburo that at44 distrlot or oounty attarney ahal' b4 entitlsd~ to tdn per sent of all f~Lne4, fortelforss or ~,oneye.oollsated for the "tat% OF County, upon Jud~snta reoovsrod by hhw he6 baen hbld to CO&- far no rl&t to commlseions tta aolleotlon ci rGr money in suite whioh am in every rerpeot afvil HoGorclpra R. 3. FUtohey, Jr.* %XfJ 2 in abslwaoter or in no rcannar ooamotad with the abmfialstratfon of arlnlnal law, but to a.nply only 1~ case8 arlainr, undem t~ha Ten61 Code, or Coda or .2rininal Prooaa-dura.' *!Che raota in the inntant kaoa arat x4y Selton had bean oonvlotad In ~oounty oourt la .Jaapar~Countyfor selling liqtmr from her pr4~z;lsas. An lnjunatlon was gotttn out In Cletrlot Court enjoining her frocuslng her wen?iaea ior that purppse. The rIolate the lnjunotlon, 3. Zortln of t&o Attornay Qanaral*a department prepared the papers Sor rrontampt prooeadinge tor lb. .Grady 'artr *:%en ttZlstriot or Pounty ittorney has ool- leated aoney for the "tate or my County, he shall Eonarable' R. 73. Xltohey, Jr., Pago 6 wlthiithlrty days arter wosiving the same, pey it into the Treesurg 0r the Sbato or the County in drloh it belongs, after deduoting thersfroa and ratalnlng the oornriaalonoallowad hia thereon br law. Suoh Distriot or County Attorney shell be entitled to lw~ oomt.isrlonfrom the llr8t 31000 aolleoted by hit?in any one oaaa for tha State or .Couuty troll,a4 :ndlvldualoz!aostpa4, and 5$ on ell suma over 41000, to be retained out of the mqney when ooltr,otrd, and he shall also be entitled to retain the sam oamlaalons ou al'1oolleotlona made for the 3tate or for the County. . . ." Apparently the above quoted statute provide8 oak niselonn ror the Mstrlat or County Attorney on nonays ool- looted by hla-sII~:6lvll 8uitn and doeo not apply to acmtoz& prooeedfngs behau~, aa stated above, oontempt moaaedislga era not ptoperly ololl suits. Gontan@e are matters au& gsnoric end are neither orlminal oases nor olrll oases in -the atrloteat sense; or au these terms Bra ordinarilyde- fined by law. 1% have railed to rind any statute providing ia occxaiaslon?or a Dietriot or County Attorney on mmey paid aa a :l.nein a oantexsptproooeding and in the abeenoe . or auoh a statute, wa raspeotfullyauswer the abovr stated question in the negative. - Youre very truly