Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. I OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ’ Kononble Jo.l’utts countyAttolnay orlM1 county Aadorsoa, Texu .JeaorglrJoemlltE* Irg)t i. -. ...~._ . 'i, .QnrslrrCm IO cMmor Oountr or the stdo of Toma llabloior bugem woaltUgtr0a l felluroto proprrly plaoo a oulrertullbor a dorig- mted Stat.Kighray,profldti pemloolon-49bxlng oul.~lo obtallud? Vhlo queotlondooriot oeoato hare overa- ~rloon ,intb roporto4 .aaooo. "Theugumont fromthe eouaty'mrldolo thlor managaomnt and oontrol Z'gll of the highwaylo lxar- oloedby the State ElghwayDepartasnt.Orlmoo Countyno longerhaa any mMwlty la the pro- Piooo;and therefore It appearsthatthe 8tato HighwayDepartment lo l&able.The StateHighray Departmenthas olnorrsoonstruoted the rlght-ot- 'warin the lmuiedlak rlolnlt~ or thr dunged pro- P-tY*, The ohangoln oont*l 0r tha highwaylo what make6the problemoompl*x.I rlaa no stat- uto touahlng the qw8tloa* '. to ui the Upon thlo stateor ia&@ you hareoubmltted followlag qurIltlont gQW3TIOli:Ir Qrlau County or the Stateot Pak~llable torbamagaonoultiugfroma tailuru topro~lyp~oe~o~~e~t~rr~~l tpz;-T, prmldd pemloolonto b 0 Subooquont yourletterof October 17, to reoolrlag lwl, *e wrota you on lwmber 16 19u, nQu00tlng that ymTr a&lo8 uo whether the reoozmtruotfon or salntenauoaof the hi* ry ir questlo br th6 State Eleha6yDopartantin 6ny m6nn6r oauad flu and whothoror not the eulrert9.n damagein queotloa qu66tlon ~66 6h6ng64 or reaonotruot&la my mannuB In roplJ t0 thi0 in@ry 0nNo~edu 85, 19U, youwrotooil 80 r0n0w: *Taik10 ln umw to rob latterdated Hovomber l8tha&lag whothoror not the moon- ltr uo tloo n r the himay by lihm Stak El&way DC partaantin any manor oauod tlu damageln wo- tloa and whetheror not the oulrer$In qumotP011 olunge4’or noonotruotod In any manner. W(LR .~ "To both of those qurotlono the aauar~$f ': ‘llo ’ l The x lg b m y Dq wlr tBm h a s ma nly a a lnta la -s ti tbh, ~l"tiOUblr 66otion fd tho aighraf. jbavy' r$no esohyearVWIJF the edmnl~af&nrcooglld+r-- an4.natumlJ.yneualrton4rlllarou#o&$o porY &mlly raotors.the emboikmoat, .60th8 state- ment 8 *ThestateEighvm~ Departneat has alme ro- .oonotNateQ the rlghf-ofzray f.n the lmmoillnto viol- nlty~ot.the damogeQproperty' rlmplg Emanithat tha doputmqnthaa lasJn$dnoQ it. aIt.lo.trw that OrlmeoCountyronotruotrd tho.oul~u%laquestion whereit now lo. The EQh- wqlo, poq a *in art+-ial h.Wmy, andwas Dakea . over.by '$ha'G$atrKlghtray&Jspartzent rem soonmf- to? lto.ooagletl~~nbf ~?r~eo~$louaty, #+x1 ‘gladly.enewor any further questtom .Tr, whlohyou.mayham.' .. hlghway by tho.Stak Klghuay Dopartmoate ia our undorotaadlng It irroa your lettrro rbow quot- oathatthohl ln question was oklglmllybuiltby Orimer couaty, an4 that @Tot failure at tha tlao oi muoh.oonrtruetloa to pro~ido&~OulYutin #id highmy has6lvort.dowtela wetor rooultlng ln ~daaw~o to abutting pmsporty. Buboequentto tam ooairtruotlon~or raid hlghwq b the oounty the state Highnay nt took imm over en6 ~6~uLLltalnod lt~elnooouoh tlma 6 b&as the oaoo lt 1s okr opinion thatthe dama&@’& any, g r- l to the 'abutting property b rlrtq oi .tallure to O&l a oulvort rooultrd lamedlet & up04t Oarpi0ti0n 0r th0 hi*16y althou& water maj not hate boa dltertrd by lt tintll owm sub- lr q uuit tlga. T h u r fo r w re,uo CU th eq inlo athat th edotage noulted from the oonatruatlon and not trap the mnlntananoo eC mah highway. You am themfon, adrlood it ln that oplnlon thb : .i$thlid.partad that unbrtha frrtr ret forth the waunty &a¬ tkttt@a lo llible tar any b.mga rwaltlng fmatho iNmUwto pmido,th oulrert inquootielt. ” NO truot that thlo rully anowe tha qu*otlon pnooat- .:.6byym. :.