Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A’lTORNEYGENERAL OF - AUSTIN Honorable A. E. EIoksr4on, Pam C tham, mnmely krtlol~a 4&&-MO, In@., Vernon'4 Anaotat4d Cod4 or Criminal j:roaeaum. It ie stated In Texae Jurisprudsnoe Volume :5, page 924: "The undertaking of the bail I4 an original undertaking for the apgaarance of the principal to answer the charge agein4t him. Ii they a0 no h4v4 him in 4012x-t ’ aocortllng to the term4 of their obligation, the undertaking stands forfeited, the pro- ceeding to exact torBiturs beIn& prseorlb'ed by statute. * * *" In order to compensate the county in whioh n oriainal proaecu?;Ion ie had, provIsIon Is sad8 by the Cod4 for th4 pay- ment to that oounty of the amount4 00li40t0a from rorf4Itod bail bontla; the auum are not r4guIre12 to be pelt? into the State Tremeury for the bonefit of the stats at large. Axti414 949, C.C:P., proqitlee in part: Woney coUeat44 by an offi44r upon r4oognIzano44, ball bonds and other ObligatiOn8 r44OY4Md UpOP In th4 ~4 Of the Stat.4 * * * shall h4mwIth b4 paid over by tha offioars aollooting th4 mama to the oounty~traasur4r or the proprr aounty' after firat dsduoting th4rafrom th4 Lsgal fetrs and oommissIo~ ror sollsotlng tha uam4.* Article 424, cods of Ctiminal .zroaaaure prcmia48: Whenrsvar a damiant IO bound by rscognlzanoa or ball bond to appear at anp term or a oourt, and falls tc appear on ths day sst apart for taking up the orfmlnal docket, or any eubsequent day when his case ,'~ cm44 up Sor trial, a forfeiture of his rsoognlzanae or ball bona shall be taken,,* S4ctioa 11 of Artlolo 4 of the State Constitution, ;gl~;Ggrent or power to ths Gov4rnor, provides In part a8 ** * + 21 all oriminal caa40, eraapt tr(3aaon and lmpeachmnt, the tkvernor 4hall ha'?4 ~powar, aftsr oonviotion, on tha,written Hgnsd rsooramendation and ado144 of tha Board of iijirdOn6and R~r0144, or a ~~~%Jorftytihers- or, to grant r4prieves and comuntatlons of Honorable A. 3. HIokerson, Pago 3 punishment and pardons; and under suoh rules as the Lagfslatura may prssoriba, and Ui)On the written r4mmond4tIon and advice of a majority of ths Board of Pardons and Parolaa, he shall have the gowar to reait rinea and forfeitures. * ‘+,** The Leglelature has provldsa in this raspaot t&t "ths Governor shall h4v4 powar to m&t forf'eituras or recognizanoea and ball bonda.* (Artlole 034, Vsrnon*s knnnotatfsdCode of CrImtoal Prooedura) Articla 439, Vernon's Annotat48 Code of CrIatml Prooedum provides; "If, barore final od@asnt is shtarad aij&hst ths bal i tha ~rinolpal apqsar or be arreatod ani lodead In jaI1 of the protim oounty, tha oourt ma at ite discration, r&t the who14 or p 2 of tha sum 4p40iri44 in the bona or r440@8an44.* It is tttfitd in TOXRO JUrisp~Ud.n$e, VOlUlEO s, &al@. 933 that: eThIs statuta graiits authority to the trIa1 oourt to rmmlt a torf&htr4 tuc4n, 4114 aloo laaveu it ,to bhr dirsrrtlon of tha oourt as to whather or not rueh a rmnl#aionahall ba xfiae~. This dlsoration la oonfldad to the trial w!?i4, and not to ths Court or CrImInal Agpsals; and It Ia only In those 6aseo wham the moor4 a.lsalosss that the trial, oourt hem abuss dlscratlon that ths um& zfz appsal wIl1 disturb tha jud#nsnt. In addition to tha diooretlonarp powsrWhIeh the oourta are clothed to rdt the wh614 or a part of the ferfsi,tura, It axgears that remIssIon may be a matter OS right + Art1614 440, VsrnontsAnnotatsd Cdl@ of CrIstLml Pro~m¶urs >rovidssr "Vlh4n the prtiolgal appsars before tha ~atq of~.fylnaljudgacsnt, and suftiiolent aaus4 Is ahown for his rallure to appertr bsfors the rOrr8ittIX4 is t&can, and a trial Is had-of the orietinsl aatlon pending againat hira, ho 4338 Eonorab:La A. 2. Iliokeraon, Page 4 shffll 54 entitled to have th4 r0rf4itu4 44t aside. The orimi~~al nction a&xdmt hlinLshall stand for trial but the State shall not be forced to try the SSE~ until reasonable time hae been allowed to propare for trial, and the State ehall, in such case, be entitled to a ooatinuano4.w Article 436, Vernon's Annotated Cads of Criainsl Yroced,.dii~ez specifically provides exc.lusive defensive oauses which must exiet in order that final judgment of forfaiture may be avoided. Keferring to this statute, it is atated in Texas Surleprudence, Volume 5, page 938: " * * * It was maotad for the &pose of confining a ourety't, defenses to one cf thoee anmarated, and, to prevent any inquiry as to theI guilt or innoo4no4 of tho priaclpal def'endant or of the validity o~~.Anvalldlty of the indiatmmt. The aausea waiah will eronsrate the1,obliEore from liabflfty are held within narrow limits, eddenoing an intention m the part of the ls&alP- UIVJ tr, insure the state against the buMen of msettns multiplied issues of iaat. In order to be qxoneratad from liability, thei obllgors mst bring themselves within the provisions of this statute whioh my be done only upon proper pleading L thk trial court.* mr tha puspses 0r this opfnioa, we must aerate that the forfolture of the above mentioned bond an6 the oolleotion of the &CO&O was lagally dana as apeoified by ths statutes governing Qarteiturss of raoognizances nnc? bail bonda. We have discussed, above, the remlesion of forfeitures of re- cof;nl24nesb and bail bomds a&d the ciroumstanaee under whfoh they are permitted. Zrrview cf the foregoing authorities and under the facts stated, you are resgoctively advtaed that it ia the opinion of this department that the Commiseionrrs~ Court has no losal right or authority wh&tsosver to remit br refund the above mentioned $800.00. Honorable A. E. Hickorson,PagO 5 Trusting that the foregoing fully anuwers your ATTi)RP:%Y GEf:E&& :i .E