Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN YQW letter re reaue iron 'bebb Oounty, diotaeat 1118 nbumed. of ~eilwn Gounty bsgian its OA the 9th &onday er8W the ry, 1941, rhfoh wan the 9th day ia a fair greaumptionthat a patit icr the rooadl uoek of thet oourt any oeaea OOS&IVJb&on It, ad ewh OA the 14th and l(l8hda8 Qf @%, we@ wbe to @B to 8,rialin the ame ot 8&e 3tete of Texan VI nix, but this awe WaS OOAtiAseb e&Adnot tried. *To Potit jury fees in oa~eGtato TE. Thornso a. Dix, na. ai73 Qcwea rrop sobb Oouaty To dil00n ~UA&jWy Was use4 Owe 48y0 In en effort to ge0 . . . bl66.06 (&Ml14 wid 16, 194l.k" *l%o woeunt is oertiilsd to as bei oorrsot b f. 0. Fxubklin, Qlerk ot the BioDrlst3 our0 of Wl8on Qounty, Texas, under date ot kZay lOoh, lS4-1 eisd was also o*rtiiSeil as lmlqg *eorreH and fOacd be paid by Webb &panty to Wlso~ Oounty in osnneotfon with the &oro ease,” br 3, B. Cart, DistrioB Judg0, Blst Spdloial~Bistrfotof Tsxas. mXnasmoh as ArMale 1060, C. C. 0.. qwtsd above, refers Go the tx%al Jury snd not to tslamasn stamfmd r0r 4 week*8 jurg aervfao, I ttiaof t.hs oplnioa that Yebb County boss not owe tais bill and will so adrlso our wrwles1o~~re* oour8 beoauoa I do not .oonsMw t&o law to ruquire&ebb Bsiuxti~ in thts lnstraoe Be pay far jurorsowmcmed for the week in Wilson 6oun%raad not ussd In the ttial of thfs oese. ". . . *IMawauh es tbn are ~0 deoisioas of our hi&es 0ouzW uadsr these two artioles and I am not aware o? any opinion thqreaonissued by your Oftlea, I submit it to Jou tapon8bs phiA prsrisionsof the statutes ad reqtlest(LA opinion frost JOtW Ottleo as to w&sti~t @ebb Gounty is llsblo for jury service few under the peoulliar o~reumstanuss hero pre8wCed.” Artioles 1050 and 1061, Code of Criminal Pmmtlure, reed as tollswsr "krtiule 1060. In all 8ases wheto iadlatmmti here besa prssmtsd 8gafmf parsons in one eountJ end auoh oatmas hare hour rwovsd by abang of TSAW to anathrr rounty, sod bried therein, tha oounty from uhloh sucrhasuso ls rssored shall be llsbk Par all expmses inaurrmd for pay for juror* 13 trylag suah oeuaes." HOA. Stirling T. Phslps, page s “Artiols 1061. 2hs oDunty oozumisuionsraof eeoh osaurtyet ssoh re@ufar meeting shall esosrhin whr find YOAW tRer, rinse the lalt regular maoting, any parson has been tried f&X’ Orins UQon a ahangs ot iSOlDany other oounty. .Ifthey such to be the oaas they shall me&s out sn aoaount against sueh aounty tram w&loR suoR~6ousewas rcllaored showing the nuaibrrof days the Jury 4n 8uoh oar08 wea aaiployedSlmreiA, snd setting rorttbthe smount paid ior ruah jury ser- doe1 suoh ioastmt.shall %hoA be aertiiied to as oerreet by the oounty judge of suoh ocruptp,uPder his hand an8 seal, and bo, by Bir, forwarded to the oounty jodge of the oounty iroa whioh the ssld oauss.was rc movelljrhioh aooouot'shallbe paid in the same war as aooeunts for the safe koepfng of piso~ezw.~ Considoxing hrtieles 1066 and 1661, supra, it ir epparaAt that the expeasa hourrod tar pay for juroro in trying such oases Be mentioned in said stetutw is not dus aAd payebls until the oaee of Oases are aaWaUy tried. Under tha fasta ateted in your letter, the ease has not been trisd. Thetifore, it ia~our opinion that ths olsbr. raoentsdby ail-n Gaudy is premature aAd esnAot AAW be paf d by ilsbbOouaty. It and when thu easa lo eotuauy tried ia ~ilaon Cowty end a olaiin Is prmsentsd by Wilson County to ,&ebbCouuty, H will then bo gl8d to oo~ider any further roquest oonuer&i$ the ssme tht you ary desire to prsswt. TrusCiw that the foregoily fully koswsrs your inquiry, w* are Yours very truly FIRST ATTORN-- Al-dellwi.l1isms asraietant