Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN HonorableJohn D. RmB, ?a$* 8 at Big 0SiS8~tWb.r b UK%. 0Onta.h~ the J3&Ub3 fo lr 0wIng lta ta Qentt Wmd I be given wiploy- zneqtby you, ?ltherthe podtion appliedfar, or same other,now or hemafter, I bazeby a6mo that my be terainatebby yau at an;l suoh sa?ploynmnt time withoutllabllltyto mo for wager or salary swept ewh ad my bar* been oarwd at the date of such temi8atIon.* We therefore rare not nquired to have any rewon ior pour termfaatfen.nirthw, we undwetand Taxa6 Courta have dealwed a Btatuteuueh am that nmntionedin your letter a? We 7th unoonatltutl~nal.(6igaod)Ar*lrtaat Oumml QuporlnOendent.~ will Veur o ,inIo n b elp p r eo lste6 o nth e QuwtlQJl - ss a Qorpwatioa require6 to & vea bi8ohar~a4amplop a rtabaent la aitiag t&e eawa oi hla dIrohar&e- in or6a tlmP we my 4letel!dno what pr0e*duro it My, to take an a matter tht is a0w pen&I* beian tbir Dsgar(cL'. mu&~*. " . , , drtloie6196, Vemon*mCivil E&u&~ reds, la pax%, au iollowut =wlther or of the ioll0ufng a0456&balk ., oatutl$u$o lisor !%a tien agalmmt p*mew reekln@ craplo~ul* t Where mny 8orparatIon or rti*iwi oil the .:; doiw bumlnem ia thii #%&a’ 8z agent cr’arployeo Of auoh aorpontbion ir r*M “3 tap, =. 8hall have &Imhar@ aa enpioyaean& maoh en&.oyw baaad a 8tatementin writing of tb mm* of hie dIuaher8r,and 8uoh sorporatlon,meelvor, agent or emplcyee thsrsoffail8 to fur&ah a true statuwnt oi the #une to 8uo:hdiaohargge+l amployw, within tm daya after rush danmad,8r where any oorporatlon or rooalvrr 0s tha oame, or any ofrlaeror agent of azoh eorpontlon 01 raoeirershall fall, withintm dam aftsr writtendemerdl for thr #ame, to furnishto any employeerolmtarily learingthe 8enioe of 8uob aorp0ratioaor reoelrer a statementin writingthat 8uoh employeedid lare moh suvlaa voluntarfly,0s where iiny,oorporation im reoelrerof the ilame,4oing bu8lnesa within this etato,shall fail to show in enp statement under the provlsloosf this tltlo the number of years an& months duringwhIoh lush rrploysowsu in the esrrioo0r the '&aideorporstlcmor rsoslrer in eaoh and ovsry weparetom&moit.yor position In rbioh he uaa aep;Loyr(L, aa8 whetherhim eoniou wem utiri’rotory tp roh mob oapwlty or not, or whore wy euah ooxparation er reoaIrsr eh4ll $ail wIthln ton &J* after writtesi demand fortha sama to furnlrhto any mah em loyee e tree oopy oi the 8%atemwt ox!ginalLy&ven to fwoh employeefor hI# IPI* In aaae he arm11 IraveLoot or Ie othermime cl~~;~ulof the UIO of eai4 oxiJna1 The reaum for the roenaetmentoi the b&alr%htias sktute In 1929 by the Forty4iret LsgfrlatuVe,a8 8tatottin She amrrgenay olausa, war beoausothe ~oodlfiem vi’ Ohr Re~lsoffQlrll Eitatutesof Text, oi 1988, omitted Frog!the definitionof diearimlnalba ~yllyei the mterlal pPorfeian8 of the foPinerlaw on she subjeob am 8at*0tt6ifASti4Lo 894 of the fieviardCl711 Jt6tutee oi 1911, . In 1914 the Supreme 00-t 4E Tome, In the ease of st. Louie southwestam Ry. Co. re, CaWrfn, 171 G.Wq 705, held Section3 of rzrtIols594 OS the HevistedCivil SMtutee of la11 (whioh ia ia0ntioOi In lu3gwr 0 with Seotien s of Article 5196, Vernon's CIoIl Statutes 7 ~oolaatitutiond.. Obviously,the reseon that the ooditirr6 of tke Rerlssacivil Statutea ot Tame, of loeb, omlttd 8d.4 Art1418 594 iron the 1985 tmM.flaatfon wm due: to the Saab that bad been doslsred unocmtI(lutionalby the thie .Axtlel.e BonolrbleJohn D. Rood, p 4 Trwtlng that the ‘abcwe satiafaatorily dls~tmw or your inqulPy,wa remain d Your8 VOPy tidy FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL BY