Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN zonerable John R. Shook Crlmlnal Dlatrlot Attornsy sariAntonio, Texae Deer sira nty at the Aormbbs~, mrel election? upon the above ners* Court of Berm the oon6truotlon of whlah bond6 in the thorlzsd to bs Issued the county et tha flovembar, oh hospital, alldis such tax 8 Constitution? "(3) ?i;hatprooeUurs i6 rmorsaary to hake such a tuberoular hoqdtml tax lsg61PW On liaroh(?9,1941, this departmmt mot6 you a lat- ter regusstlnrrturthar Lnformatlon r6latlYe to the ebws ~&se- fions propou&d to thi6 office Uoposrning.----..A., the byildiw of a 356 Honorable John B, Shook, page 3 tubsroular ho8pltel in 8eld C0Unty for whloh hoe?ital bonde were-Toted In th6 general lleotlon in Rwcmhsr, 1940. In reply to ous abora mentionad letter, on April 5, 1941, you wrote w in part a6 follows~ "we aoknowledge receipt a&o of your oplalon Boa 04599. I fisllsvethir opinion amwers 6atistaotorlly the question6 Ho. 3 end 3 propounded to you, end it dll not be mOeS6al'$' to 80 further into these Ql66tiOn6. We do dwirr, however, en opinion on &motion 80, 1; aa propounded in our reque6t, ths 66El6 being, 'Is the Comaisaimsre~ Court of Berar C~ounty,Texee, ooqelled to direct the conotruotlon of a tuberoular hospital, for whloh bonds in the 6~6 of $;t85,OGO.G0, were euthodxed to bs lseued by the people of the Countyat the Nommber lQt0 General El6otlon.' "For your intormtlon, this pro~~~osel to build a hospital W66 eubxltted at our Eiovcun- bar Caneral Zleotlon and at thet tfae the Comi6eioner6~ Court submitted the 6ame, imow- in& in their own minds thnt there wad not any mthod by whio::they might iso tarso to support the said proposed hoep ftal, The twenty-r%vs osnt ra for county purjsose6, em provid6d by the Conatltutlon, hsrine been already l~lod and allotted to Ot&et y.QO666, 1~1066 E. B. No, tit, ml&t provide tar aadf- tlonal tax lery for the support of said hO6pital. %