Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

223 OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN HonorableBen J. Dean DistrictAttorney Breckenriaga,Texas , Dear Sir: Your request f0 carefullyconkideredby t your request as fol.l.orvs: Where a defend ing wlillsintoxlcete 9, Vernon*s Annotated Texas Code of Cri 0ads as follows: aefendant is inaictea.fora felony nvicticn f,ia :udsbnent is by fine or ccafine:xe&,in 12x county jail, or b:rLath such fioe Ed confineaant in the county jail or convicted of 2 nisdemanor, no coats shall be pid by the State to any officer. All costs in such C~~LJSsi>:\llbe taxed, asseesed 2nd oolleaf,e~23 in misdemaafioroa8es.W f!GnOrable Ben J. Dean, page 2 Article 1071, Verno:z8sAnnotated Texas Code of cxj,siBal Procedure, reads as follci4s: *Justices.of thepeaoe who sit as an examining court in zisdoaeanor cases ahall be eutitkd t0 the Salxd 'feesallowed by lmv to such-justicesfor stiilar services in the trial of suoh cases, not tc exoeed three dollars in any one case, to be paid by the defendant in case of Pin&l convic- tion** ~~ ~--Ki%icle ,1052, Veruon*'s Annotated Texas Cods of , Criminalprocedure,,reads as fol.lom: "Three Dbllara shall be pala by the county to the County Judge, or Judge or the Court ut Law, and Wo Dollars and fifty cents shall be paid by the county to the Justice of the Peace, for each crizihaal action tried and Pirally ais::oseaof be- Pore him. Provided, hoY:ever,that in all counties having a population of 20,000 or less,,the Justice of the r"e&cashall re- ceive a trial Pee of Three Dclfars. Srtch Judge or Justice shall present to the Comissioners' Court of his cod&y at a regular tern thereof, a writttiiaccount specifying each criirinalaction in which he claim such Pee, CGztifiGa 5y such Judge or Justice to be correct, aS Piled with the County Clerk. The Comi33ioaerst Court shall approve such account for such amount as they find to be correcti;and order a draft to be issued ur,onthe County Treasuror in Psvor of such Jud!zeor JusSice for the mount so approved. Provided the Comissioners' Court shall net pay any account or trial Pees in auy case tried and in which an acquittal is had unless the State of Texas was rsg::esontedin the trial of said came by the County Attcrno:~,or his assistsrit,Crisinal FlistricbAttorney or his assiatnnt, ilndthe cartificats of said Attcrnsy is n*,tnchedto mid rlccount gcaorableBen J. Dean, Page i certifyinsto the fact that said cause was tried$ and tha State of Texas vns repre- sented,and that in his judgment there was sufficientevidence-insaid cause to denmnd a trial Of sane." The population of Stephens Countyr Texas, is loss than &O,OoO inhabitantsaccording to the 1940 Federal Cen- 8lS. Opinion No. C-2877 cf this department passes on a situationwhere a Justice o? the Penae (on the fee sys- tem) holds an examining trial where a defendant is char,ned with a felony, to wit, drlvirg a zotor re3icle while in- toxicatedand where the constable (on the fee system) cakes the arrest for em-ining trial, etc., o.ndw3are the Grand Jury indicts the defendant and %here upon trial the defendantis @*zan a fine and jail sentence and where the defendant:does not pay his fine and costs but lays the 8638 out in jail or works it out on the county roads or ether county projects. This opinion holds that under said facts the county is liable to the Justice of the Peace and constable for one-half of their legal examining trial fees in said cause. ?ieenclose hercAt!i a cow of opin- icn No. O-2877 for your information. In ansvierto your first question you are res- pectfullyadvised that it is the opinicn of this depart+ kent that the Justice of the Peace of Stephens County would be entitled to collect a fee of $3.CC from the defendantunder the facts stated: fn answer to your seccnd question it is our opinionthat under the facts stated if the defendantcould not pay the fine and costs and laid 9828 out indai.1 or ororkedit out on the county roads or on a county project the county ~:wrJahe liable to the Justice for one-half of his examining trial fee under Article 1055, 7. A. T. c. c. P. ,,,\.. . ,. 226 P-. ., cosorableBen J. Dean, Page~4 It IS to be understood tixt we do not pass upon the oonstitutionality .ofArticle 1071 of the Code of criatnalProcedure, s-spra. 1 VerJr&Cly yours 'UF:GO 1