Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

~tltulal Edueatora Pfneno* corpwatioa la 6 6wporetion 0rguri2w~ under the prwlsiana of Subdivieiou 49 ot Ar~Aal# 1302, md ma ia aristeneo prior to the aasotment of F. R. 165, enaoted by tb 45thL@.alatareameadatmy ef ArtiOhS IfiZO- 1524 Of the ite+lSsd 3tctUtss. wPrlox to the sneotomnt of this bill the oompa5y had iammd divera inatallmeat bomM, end pursarslt to the pPOVi8iOflfd of Artiole 696 of the Rwlsed Stetutos had ilepesitsb ten pa oent of its groes reo*lpta with the *tete !Pr80stu8c. "with th8 8S%&OtilL8fIt Of 5. 3. 165 abolr0 mentioned, the oompany exoouted s trust i.ndentur* epprwed by tile Eankin(: Commissioner, desigmst- :ng s national banking corporetion with trust powers at3 trustee one tizemartsr oontinuea to sell installment bonds, havhg deposit4 with this trwtos OSSS and securities, whlon, together with those deposited with the 6tat. TreeeUTer under Artlole 696, %a& ~1raaaonable mmket relw OqtlEd t0the Withsr8W81 61?.OBLIOCS1b3tiOn V&tie Of equal to the withdrawal or oaneellation value oi all bonds outstanding, Including those bonds 182 suea prior to the enaatulent oi .c. 8. 165. a oopy or the trust im¶enture mw in force ia hereto at- son. lee hredy, pene 2 tsohed. This oompeny haa no outrtanding llabf%itke othar than the bond8 SboV4 zI*lktio~, lSWrtr4d. undsr the truut iIld*nture, by am newritl.bn dipalmiaa with the tru8te4 and @ate Tk6a8mOP PUraaant $0 the statutea abwe referred to. 35, now requests authority to trander th8 64OUritiO8 held by tha State TreaSur8r into tha hands of tha Fort Werth t&itiOMl BE&C, %'U8t44, ifi OrdV th4t thW6lltircr trust fund may be handled aa a unit. "zt i8 Und4rStOOd, Or OOUT80, that I&O pSti of the f34tYUSitiU8 tranafarrad will be relaaaad of any exieting obligation now against it, bat tnis request Is norely made ior oowenlenoa of the handUng Op the entke trust fund by the Fox-$ Worth &&tioaal Ban!&, 'Im8tae. whfoh will feoilitata the oolleotlon of ooupons upon the bonds, tka mak- ing of reports end euparriaion and auditixq or tha rund. uThe question submitted here is whether or not the ~nklng ColamiSSioner may, lln&er th@ prwinione Qi s. B. 165, above mentioned, authar- ize the transfer as above set out.* The . Banking - kss&s~~onas - would not~iave~t~e pmar $a lutherim the transrer or the neourltlas mentioned by pu. Our reeuone for thtu oonolat3lon axe a8 follower Axtiole 696 Is aa fOnOW8t u~oh crorporatlon, ocmpany or indIv%duSZ, 4ow bUSin illthirStEta a8 a bond imOStarZ& OoefgsIlJ'Or ooapany to plod8 or sell banda, oartliicates or d&38* tures on the portis payment or inutalbkant plan, 8h8n deposit wit!% th8 state Treeaurar, in oash or Seouritira approved by mid l!rea8urer, the Sum of Site thoumad dollars, and shed. depeeft S~JL&~SIS~X~~~ with aaid oi- fioer, ten per oent 0s all net praraiums reosived until the sum deposited amounts to one hundred thousand doUar8.6 seotion 7 0r 34M04 Bill 165, l+25Q LagI"sleture, as amended by Acts of tha 65th La&s;lettu-a (Ifeh81a1lawa 02 Texna, 45th bg., h8@.ar E8aaion, Page i&Is) provides for the aub8tita- tion of the Stat8 Treasurer 0r Texas ma Truatea far a oor&matm trustaa previou81y designated by 8 loan and brokerage oomp8ny,aad also ror the &eta Treaaurer'a aoting a8 Suoh truafee for the dm- posit of requSxad ssouritlea in oases where there haa baan no pm- riously designated trust86. Tha plan oontempletes end requlrer the approval in oertclin resp8ot.a o? the k!&ing Conm.lSaioner. The aot as amendad provides that "all aash or seouritlee lart with the State Traaswer h oaapllenoe with ArtlclS 696, Re- T-- viaed Civil Statutes oi 1925, -s!mll b8 oowaidered es part or tha oolleteral raquirad under this 16160blo%" Zn this respeot, tha origillal S8nate Bill 1.65 wlthk-aa~kea ot the 4+d &6&8lat&iTa has not bean ohangad. ,* The rights and duties of the State Treesurer with ra8peat: to depoSita made uztder Artlola 696 are ~eaorlbed in tha suoeeading Article8 697 to 700. - -, don. Lee Rmity, par 3 Tl.iere la nothi= b theea AiTtiOlW, tiOl’ilr thel?e CULy$u ln senate m.11 No. 165 which au$horlaee the euneader d deposita asde under Artiole 696 to the oorporaOe %runlme deslgnetd Wer Senate Bill 165 as amended. The Statca Traasurer iti required $0 handle such deposits in the memler painted out by Title 21 of the Revised Civil Statutea. (Artiolas 696 to 700). Ccnstrui~ that law {Vhat 1s now Article 698 oil tha Re- v$Fd Statutes), the Supreme Court In Uart vs. Stephens, 100,8. W. , meidr "Undrtr the Sotion or the law above quoted, the oouxt has authority tc dememl, atad it 1s the duty oi the Comptroller, upon the order or the oourt, to draw a warrant upon the Treesurer for the funds deposited in bla Depsrtment to be disposed Or by the court." In Xx Parte Stephens, 94 F. ‘8.~ 327, Chief Justioo Oalnee wrota I "That the gUnas which are required by this etetute cannot be Orawn out except under the oondi- tions an@ st the tine provided by the Legisleture ie a propoeition, whlch;es we think, require6 no argument for ite eupport.* It Is thus aeon that the proposcrd transfer of SW& seourltiee to (Ips1vete oorptiete truetss Is not compatlb3.e with - the Weeeurer*a duty and llebllitg under these statuWa, and drover , 6uoh plan Is not authorized by the terma of 3eamtm Bill 165 ee emended nor by any other statuta we here bean ai&o to rind, We %mat whet we have said #uffiolently anewers the I purpose of your lnpulrg. Yours very truly ATTORNFX O=AL OP TEXAS By /6/ Oole Speer Ooie apeer kalstant OSrEP: jrb .