Hon. Clint A. Barham Opinion No. O-2587
: County Attorney Re:~ The Commissioners’Court cannot
Erath County delegate to the trustees of the school
Stephenville,Texas districts ,thepower and the authority
to spend the money-ln question, and a
Dear Sir: related matter.
Your resent request for an opinion of this Department
on the questions as -areherein stated has been ‘reaeived.
We quote from your letter as follows:
“Anorder by the Commissioners’Court has
been past here in this county’approprlating the
balance of funds of six hundred and seven dollars
and fifty-eight cents ($607.58) as a ~resultof
the sale of Road District No. 3 bonds to the
Alexander and Clairette school districts. The
order specifiesthat the trustees of the respect-
ive school districts are to be the kustodlens of
these.funds and that they are to be divided by
the trustees between the two school districts in
proportion to the taxable value ‘of property~in
each school district in this Road Bond ,District
No. 3. The order also permits the school trustees
In each district to determinewhen, where,,and
‘how the money ls’to be spent on the late,ralroads
In their respective districts. I am informed that
the State has assumed the bonded indebtednessof
this Road Bond District one hundred per cent.
“Two questions have arisen in connectionwith
the act’ionof the court In regard to this ‘matter. ”
First, can the Commissioners’Court delegate to
the trustees of these school districts the pg;Ennd
authority over the spending of ,thlsmoney?
can the school trustees lawfully divide this money’
this way and can they lawfully be the custodian of
these funds?”
Article 2351, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, among
other things, Imposes upon the various commissioners’courts the
h
Hon. Clint A. Barham, page 2
duties to "lay out and establish, change and discontinuepub-
lic roads and highways. Build bridges and keep them in re-
pair. Appoint Road overseers and apportion hands. Exercise
general control over all roads, highways, ferries, and bridges
In their counties."
It is stated in Volume 11 of Texas Jurisprudence
page 564 that acommissioners~courts are courts of limiteb
jurisdlc~ion,and that their authority extends only to matters
pertaining to the general welfare of their respective counties,
and that their powers are only those expressly or impliedly
conferred upon them by law, that Is, by the Constitutionand
statutes of the State."
A school board is a creature of the law and has only
such jurisdictionas expressly given by the statute or neaes-
sarily implied therein. Mesquite IndependentSchool District
v. Cross, 67 S.W. (26) 242; Tex.Jur. Vol. 37, page 938.
It Is a well known principle of law that funds or
moneys obtained by the sale of bonds must be used and expended
only for the purpose for which the bonds were voted and ls-
sued, and a diversion of the use of such funds or moneys for
a different purpose would be unauthorized.
After a care- search, we are unable to find any au-
thority that would authorize the commissioners1court to allow
or permit the trustees of the school districts above named to
receive and expend the above mentioned funds. Neither do we
find any authority authorizingthe school trustees to receive,
divide and expend the money or funds In question. Therefore,
both oh your questions are respectfullyanswered In the nega-
tive.
Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your ln-
qulre, we are
Yours very truly
APPROVED AUG 14, 1940 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
/s/ Grover Sellers By /s/ Araell Williams
FIRST ASSISTANT Ardell Williams, Assistant
ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE
BY: REJL,CHAIRMAE
AW:BBB:wb