Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

;- ’ 1 i OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ET. T, E’. Trlnble, peg% 2 ._~ -. npoak the English lan~ue~e. ‘i’he stntutes contain no roqui,remnt that a janitor secure a teachers’ or other certificate fron: the Department of 4uoatio;l und it is % nattsr tif oommn kmmledge that the duties of 6. janitor Bo not include teoohing uc& giving courses of ihstruotlon in thb public sohoois. Articles 2660, bt seq., i~cvisod CiVZi. Statutas, 1925, 8s ar;ended and Article 266, Penal Code, as %mnded, thsrofore ara not applicable. Article 2749, Revised Civil statutes, 1925, provide% that the board of trustees of a comon sohool district shell have the n:anagmf:nt arEI control of the publia schools and publ.io school grounds cf their dlstriot, slcploy toaohf:rs, and ap,prove all claim against the soho.ol funas of their district. All property of the school district is plaoed under the control of tho distriot trustees by tho provision of Artiolc 2751; Revised Civil Statutes, 1925. Section 2 of Articl.0 2627, Rcvisod Civil Stetutes, 1925, provldeo thet loccil school funds from district taxes %nd other aouroes my be used, among other things, Por the payment of” “janitors %hO other ezployaes.” Arti ale 2690, &vised Civil Ltatutes, 1925, provides that the oounty superlnten&ent shell’ have im~?di-,te supervision of all mttars portalnlng to publio ecluoation ir? hia cou.%ty, confer with tsachers %,h&trustees, and {