Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable Kenneth N. Clerk County Auditor Ward County Nonahann, Texas Dear sir: 0p1nlon Ho. o-2419 Reir County nuree~ lng training tnstA Texas state PI Pour request for 0 en naelved fully oonsidered by this de ote from your latter OS request aa followas it is not legal to ty Offioialr attending h the difference.” ol their renpective counties. Ye quote from 11 Texas Ju~Qpr~dence, paeel 563-b-5-6 a8 follovs: bolng conqonent parts of the State, 'ICountlee, Ilonorable Kenneth H. Clark, Page 2 have no powera or dutler exoept there vhloh 8re olearly 8%t forth and defined In the Corutltutlon and statute8. The statutes have o-19 defined‘ the poverr, pmsoribmd the dutlea, and lmpamd the llabillties of the 40&mi1~1oner8~ 00wt8, the rudltmt through uhioh the dltferent aauntIe *at, and from thwm rtetutecl awt oome all the authority verted In the oountier.... “CaanlsoioMrr’ oouPt* ara oowtl al llmlted jurlediotlon, in that their wGihorit9 ertendr only to mttera pertriaing to the general velfaFe at their xwpective oountier 8nd that their pauwr are only tham wprearlg or lmpllodly oonforred upon them by 18v, - that in, by the Constitution and statutes of the State.... “The juPi*dlotwi of oomllsslomr8’ aourtr 18 Umit6d to strictly ‘oounty burlnew, and the Lsgislrtwe hra no autharlty to enlarge their pauo~ OP jwl8dlotlan. Any &ttttmpt to oonfer upon tha oowt jti8dlotion 0f a mttw vhiah ia not *county bwlne8e’ la void. %awvec, the OOIIMII~BI<)LY~’ oourt $8 the aotivr, gave- body oi the aaunty, vith a jwluuotion th@t toua?m* in *am *srprot rlwJmt every fctatum of the oounty~e bumhem, and the oourt h4r full and general ohwge of the bwlnonr rftrir8 of the oollnty. The paver of the aourt oxtenda only to 8uoh bu8in.s~ a8 18 entwted to it by the Conmti- tution or by the LegidAtwe~ and the Letglrl4twtt my, if it ohoooea, a-t l ntter of aounty bwlnoss to aom 43enoy other than the oom~I88icwwa oourt. The term * county buaineea ’ should be @nn l broad end liberal oonutrwtion so a6 not tcr tireat the purpo*o* of the lav. And it ir h&d that the 001*Isaioners’ oourta have Implied luthapity to do vhat my Be neoesa- a r yInth elxeroi~&e of t&s dutiee or pavers conferred upon them,” &tiolo 452&a, Vermont0 Annotated Civil Statutes re8dn 88 follovs: ‘Sec.. 1. That the ~omml8slonowb oeua’t of the Banarabla Kenneth N. Cl8rk, P&g5 3 varloua Cowtie in the St8t5 of Texu ahall hw5 the luttwltj, vhen la their judgmmt it atill be deemd to be neoea8aq or 8alvS5able, to 0411.09 OIW or mom C&aduate Boglrtered nurae~ vhose dutJ it ah811 be to virlt the public 8Ohool8 In the aaunty in vhloh th59 u-e uployed, and to inve8tlgate tha health aandltloru 8nd 8anltar9 8umaundUg8 of lwh lehool5, and the p5r5on51. ph~riorlrad health oan- ditlan of pupll.5 therein, and to oo-opente vlth the publlo hsrrlthnur5lngandpmfora8uah otherand further dutle8 an r9 duly or$anircrd Boa& o? Bscrlth 8nd 10051 hwlth rutharltle5 ln gmernl be m~ulxwd al t&m by th, oomuS88loner8 oowt. "i3eo.2.Th8t8&idnur8er vhu15orppointed ahallb5 eqplo9ed on5ma~thSy aalarptobe fixed by the camsi88lonen oaurt and ahrll at all tlm8 bo rubjeot to remotnl b9 the oaml88lonercr oourt vithout prior natloo. "Sea. 3. The ou555ls5lamr8 court 8hall b5 em- paveredtoappraprl~ta fromanyhuads of there apeative uountier t&5 n5oerury wy ta oavw the ulary or 8uoh nur508, not to exa#d the bum of $1,800.00 to uoh numb, md ln ddltioa thornto ry approprlrrto rddltlonal fund5 to oovor all ox- pvtn505thatmyk proper sndruoe55aq lnth5 vlsltlng of 5uoh aohoolr,, md Qeneal Pub110 Ee8Zth lWW.ng inoludiqtrumpartatlonand other-lnoiden- tal expen5U195.' We think the above quatod urtlolo neither authorire nor prohibit8 ths county aomia8laner8* oaurt fmm expending saunty fund5 to ~9 th e eq a ta e8 of a o o untr nww lttsndlng training imtitute8 oanduoted aver the State b9 the Stat0 Hwlth nttpartmnt . Artlola 4418f, Vornan*8 Annotated Texas Civil Stattlla, pmds a5 follav8c "It rhrll be lmful for the Bt8te Depwtment of Health to aooept doortlOM and OOntZlbUtlMUr ta be experxled in the lnterert of thm publlo health and the onforoomentofpublio health lur5. m Hanorable lSenneth M. Clark, Prgs 4 oom18510ner5t court of my oounty ah811 have the authority to apprapriate and expend loner fram the general revenues of the 0Ounty far and in behalf of publlo health and 88nlt4tlon vlthln its oou&." ~nder5oaring wrs) The above quoted atatute gives to the oanmlaslanws~ ouurts of the OOuntiw of this Stet5 a bruetl grant of authority In the 5pproprirtlon and expemUture of the general revem of their oountlea ln behalf of pub110 health uid nnitrtlon vit.h%n their countlea. PubUo health 8nd ruJitatlon w there- fore *oaunty bualm8s~,and the aami88lanor8~ oawtr have a vide ran@ of authority and dlsontl~n in the expenditw oi the ~~~v~uea Of thr, CtOWItiOBinbehalf Of pub110 hulth aa& ranitatlon vithln theis oauntles. It folbwa that if the aemi8aianw5* 00urt 18 of the 09inlon that the atterxlanoe of the County lhl’8. UpOntmlnl.q instltutea oanduuted br the Texas Itate Health Ds+rtment la benefiolal to end 15 ln b&elf of the publlo health ud~wita- tlan at the county, then the oarrl5slamm~ mm.rt8 vould &ve authority to pay the expen5oa at such County l&s80 attendin& auah lzmtitutes out of the genewl fund5 of the Oauatx. TM5 ao~tmmt 50 held an Deoember16, 1938, in 8n opinion mltton by %onor8ble R. B. Ony, hsalatant httomq Qeneml, and noord- ed in Vol. 383, pages 965-6, Letter Oplnlans of l2m Attorney Senttral of Toxae. Th5~) is aa stitutory authority vhlah would pornit th8 ci~i~lanen* court5 to expead Oounty fund8 for the pym8nt of oxpen of aounty offlotals attending oonvontlOn8. Artlole 3 , SeOtlOn 3, o? auf State Ccvutltutlan pravldea thet ~,",~~od and oolleated by th5 goneral l8n and for z It 15 fundmentallm thatexpenditwes t be'only fOT publla mm08 15 Oorpu5 Jwla, %Ou55ing eXpOMe5 Of public %iOttrS, wee the following VOr~5~ "Ordlorrlly member8 or aeunty bamd8 are entitl- ed to no #&or allwan or omlummt v&atev*r out- side of Me oompen8ation fixed by lav far their aer- vit305, and to be 0ntitiea to that oampenmtian they must br$ng their aervio56 and 5xpma8es vithin the terms of the st8tut0, ~utharitlng the payment, it being thQ rmle that they 8%~ entitled nautthm to Kmlneth W. Clark, xonor8b1i3 Pee 5 ordinary nor clxtra aampewtion or x-e-labw?ramlDnt for urvloes rendered or exponneo -- inaurred in the do- or unautnorldod aatu OUti8ldO the roopoor their ofiialal dutiem, OVISIthough their. 8emloer we far the kneflt of their aowity.’ This department W repeatedly held that the oom- mi6aionem~ oourt ha8 no authority to ox~~nd oowity funds to pa ylxpmfm or oounty offlos.mla in attending aonventions be- oauu mu0 ln not *county bwlnere’ 8nd them 18 no rtatutory oc aenutltutlonal authority to p1 mm. 840 oonf~~nae oplnlen Ho. 2018, dated April 2, !I919, vrltten by Hoaarablo John Jkivell Aasistmt Attomoy Oenerrl, roaerded in Vol. 5P, pa,gea 262-3-6, Conferenoe Cpinlosm oi tim Attorney Omen1 of Texas, vhlah aontaina a ?ull dirrow*Un of thlr qwation, and m r th a r o p lnlo M or th is a mtment l !F h o dlr tina tlen Wtvua th e tvo r itwtio n8 pointed out in your lsttclr are 8B fOllou0~ 1. Artlolo h418f, Vemma’~ ¬ated Taxu Citil Statutu .*upu, givu the oomluSoruM~ aourt ml* rtme0ry rutlwrlty ta my the crxpmmea of the Countp Purw in bttendlng trahin# iMt1tut.r of the Texas mat. xu1th Degmwelat out or the pneml revonuea or the amusty if the aemmiaaIoaera~ aourt ir OS the epam311 that auah rttmd8nao 2.n bmeriairl to anti8 ln behali of tha pub250 health and mmitatlon of the oeunty. 2. The attendmae ot oourity offlofalrr at oonvontionrr Z8 not *aountJ bwiaera@ urd t&am ir no rtatutory or ooneti- tutloarl authority &&oh vould authorira the aaalawbner8~ c o ur to t e x p ero nl o untg r unds r o r th e~y m m t o fmla h lx p eM 08 OS swh oouaty offioiala. VJ?rAW