Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. . OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN . . Hon. B. F. MaMlllen, Fege Z fire, burglary, theft, robbery fluwronce pro- teotlng public fund8 and lwludlng the aost or eurety bond. ror hia Deputlea, such.expshsss to be pa88e4 on, pre-determlned and allowed In kind and amounts, as nearly a8 po88lble, by the Com- mi88loneT8* co no0808oh month for the en- 8ulngionth,apo"f;# ppliaatlon by each oftber, 8tl¶tin&the kind, yrobsble smunt of erpbhd1tu.m 8nd the neaas8lty for the erpen8er of his offlae for 8uah eMulog month, whlah sppllaatlon 8hal1, before presentation to ~14 aourt, flrrt be en- dor8ed by the Oounty Auditor, ii any, otherwbe the County Treasurer, only a8 to ~whether fun48 are atilable for payment of 8uah expense8. . . *Suah pwaba8a8 8hsll be nrde by eaoh offloer, *hen allowed, only by reqUi8itiOn ln'hanner pro- rldod by the County Auditor lf any otherwise by the cd88iOllVI' Court. &oh orricer rhall, at the a1088 of eaoh mnth of hi8 tenure of offloe, JU8keMiteidzsd 8ILdsworn rSpOX% Of811 EQprOVed expen8os incurred by him an4 aharged to hi8 oounty, aaaowp8Wlng mah report with Invoice8 aorerlm Noh~pura~re8 end requlsltlon8 ta8ued by him in mpport of euah report. If 8uah expen8es be in- ourred in oonneotlon dth any partlauler aan suohroport shall name suoh 088e. Suah repor&, lnvaloor and requlsitlon8 8hsl.lbe aubjeat%o the audit or the Oeunty Auditor, ii any, othenrf8e by the‘ComaI8sloner8* Court, 8n4 lf It appears that 8ny Nasras not Incurred by 8Uah ofrIaer, or that 8uoh Itea wms not a neoe8sary or legs1 expeme of mtah orrioe,or purahe8e4 upon proper requl8ltlon, 8ueh Item 8h811 be by 8014 Caunty Auditor or aourt rejeotul, In which as8e the payment of suah Itam my be adjudIaate4 in any oourt of oomptont jurle- dlatlon. All suah approved olaims end aaoount8 shell be pal4 from the Orflaer8' S8lary Fun4 un- less otherwl8e provlded herein." The Offloers* Salary Blll he8 been Incorporated In Y&on*8 We of Crlmlnsl Procedure as Article 59Ue. Sea- tlon S provides for payment of salaries in lieu of teee. Seatlon 4 orsate the COffiaer8* Salary Fund" for counties aontainlng a pOpUhtiOn Of leS8 than 190,000 populstlon, wherein aounty or preolnat offloer8 are aompon88te4 on a salary baela, ml require8 suoh fund to be kept Se?srste Ron. H. F. MohUlan, Pace 3 an4 apart from all other oounty fUnd8, to "be held and 4lsbur8e4 for the purpose of m~inp, the nLarle8 of Offloers and the darle8 0s 4 tia, aS8i8tOnt.8and clerks or Of- Hoer8 rho are dr8win7i 8alm-y rrolpsaid fund . . . and to 0s their offIaes.w ?rom reading the above quoted excerpts from the 8tatute8, It is alear to us that the Le&lature never in- tended that either aountf or prooInat oftlaers 8hould be allows4 a stipulate4 fixed monthly sum a8 expen8e8, but that oaah item of expen8e 8hould be 8Ubmltted to the hudl- tar 81~3 Conzmlsslonus* Court for approval or rejeatlon. We therefore answer your question fin the negstlte. Tru8tlng the abws satl8faatorIlpanawr8 your ln- qulry, we are Yours very truly AlTORR!lYG-L OFTEXAS BWrlw ;p&o;Z Au&l9,1939 A!i+ORMET'GENERALOF TlCXAZ3 Approved Opinion Committee By E.w.5., Chairman *J-F