aj4
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
i’
AUSTIN
Pebruory 9, ¶Qg3B
non* L* A* wooha
state superintendent OS
pub110 Instruction
Austin, Texar
This will
February 7, 192&J,
so that the
Mly enacted.
d the caption OS the above
eolf, and we do find a variance
the caption and the last sontence
y call fo your attention the case of
001 District et al vs. Earrs by the Com-
d Sound In 41 8. W. Czd) p 9, thich case
we believe is In Faint on the question presented. nl? quote
the lan,aage of the court In passing upon the Act OS the Legle-
lature then in question:
.
.The langunge of the title thereoi not
olear in some roapeote is sufficient we think to
apprise the ordinary mind of the Subject matter
*i:
IEon. L.
of the body of the Aot. The contention that
the rubjeot OS the Aot 18 not exjwe88ed in
the title IS o r er r u lc d l
The oaption of the Aot before ~8, thoagh at var-
Iauce In tho lost part OS it, Is sutiioient a8 to the
vhole OS it to give notice of what the Aot oontains.
We therefore hold that the Article in question has
been properly enacted by the Legislature.