Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 6l.D 0. MANN I”.. .*“s..L Januaxy Z7, 1939 Hon. Ooorge R. Sheppard Comptroller of Fublio Aooount8 Austin, Tous Dear I&. Sheppard: -. .' '.\ \ in the letter froa the law firpl t0 JOUr latter, &XW 88 tOiiOWCtt OS a Vualners Building Campaigna by The Peooa Entuprl~e and ooop- uatltig amrohanta in the town OS Peoos. Aa rooltad in the opinion of the Attorney General rrferred to, the prlmory purpose of the oampaign wag to stimulate buslnees and to provide employment for a number of foone ladlea. The plan was worked out on a oommlsalon basis with extra remuneration in the form of an euto- Hon. Ceocpe H. Sheppard, January 27, 1939, Dupe 2 mobile presented to the young lady in the oampni~n :$homade the moat sales. 'The salesladies employed in the enterprise sold ooupon books upon which there we8 printed the name of one of the oooperatlng msrobonts. The book4 were in vnrlous denomlnatlons and were sold for the full face amounts thereof, the books being aoceptable at full value to the msrohont whose name wes prlnteC thereon. The 41rls oountsr-slcned the books and delivered them to the purohoser, made a note on the stub and reported the sele to The Peoos Rnterprlse and made due aooountlng of ths monies received. Upon report belnp made at deslcnated intervals, The Feoos Enterprise in turn pold to the young lady maklnp ths ssls a desleneted oommlsslon or the monies oolleotea. Then of the funds so rs- celved an amount was deducted to assist In paying the sxpenses of the oampalw, and the balanoe re- nalni~ was paid to the respective oooperatlng mer- ohants. Then as the oampaien olosed, the girl who had sold the largest amount of ooupon books reoelved an automoblls, in addition to oosh oommlsslons al- ready paid. *In the a~re.m.nt entered Into betwesen The Peoos Enterprise and the respeotlvs oooperatlne msrohanlts It was rsolted that ths elrls engaged in the sale of the ooupon books were entered in a Wpopularlty" oon- test; however, the award of the automobile was not baaed on "popularitya* rather it was bared upon the industry of the lndlvldual partlolpant. Ho votes were oast by any persons. It a prospeotlve oustomer desired to favor a rrlcna'or.ao~ualntanos, he or she mlfht make purehase of a desiwated amount of ooupon books from the young lady in question; however, on aaoh sale the tlrl making the sale had paid fo her a derlnit. oommlsslon, and then, at the end of the oontest, the youn(!lady maklne the largest sales of ooupon books had present~~dto her an automobile In , addition to the amount or oommla~lons theretofore paid to.her in oosh. "During ths entire oontest the young ladles enter- \ ed were oarrled on the payrolls of the oompany (LOem- Hon. Caorpe H. Fiheppnrd,JAnuary 27, 1939, Page 3 ployees and due payment was made of social seouri- ty tax on eaoh of the young ladles. In other words, The PeooA Enterprise treoted the salesla- dies as its employees And accounted for soolal security tax, And on the award of the automobile accounted ror the value of the same by payment of the proper Amount of social security tax on its said value." Y;edlreot your attention to Article 7M71 (a). In this portion of the statute you will note thet every puson, firm or corporation oonauctlng a theater, plaoe of amusement, or any bualnsse enterprise In oonneotlon with the operation of whloh a prize In the form of money or something of value 14 offered or flven to on. or more patrons of suoh theater, plaoe or amusement or plaoe of buslnese and not plven to all patrons thereof paylap the some OhArge for Any woh service, oommodity or entertainment will be required to pay 20$ of the value of said prlw or Flit as provided in seotion (b) or said Article. Xt Is the opinion ot this Departient, and you are so advised, that under ths faots sutaltted with your lnqulq, no tax would be due the State beoause eaoh of the persons selling the ooupon books was oarrled on the payrolls of The Peoos Enterprise as an employee and was not a patron as would bs affeoteclby the provisions OS Artlole 70471, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas. The automobile that WAS &iven to the em- ployss sslllng the largest numbsr of ooupon books, ln the opinion al this Department, would not be olasssd as a prize bat, on the other hand, would be a bonus and/or sxtra oom- peneatlon for suvlces randered by the employee. Yours very truly ATTORREY cSXKXL OF TKXAS