Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

February 8, 1339 Honoraole Geo. H. Sheppard Comptrollerof Public Accounts Austxn, Te;ras Honorable Jack diech Overruled by G-s344 %n so County Attorney far as it conflicts Brownsville,Texas Gentleman: Opinion No. O-50 Re: Commissionof Tax Assessor-Collectorof Cameron County for assessing State taxes. On Decemoer 2; l2jo, tne County Attorney of Cameron County ad- dressed a request to the Attorney General for a constructlon.of Articie ~660, Section 14Li,anu on December 14, 19385 a conference opinion written by H.~L. eilliford, Assistant Attorney Genera?, was given in response to the request. On December.31,1938, Hr. Sheppard, the Comnsroller,addressed a letter to this Department requesiinga clarificationof,the .iillifordopinion, and on January 4, 1939, an opinion was delivered to i:ir. Sheppard in response to his request, such opinion oeing written by Lloyd Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General. On January j, 1939, hr. tiiech,County Attorney of Cameron,County,addressed this office a letter requestinga further opinion of this Department on the same subject matter, ishichwas answered on January lo, 1939, by a letter irom 1~. Ceo. 9. nerry, Assistant,simply adhering to the iJillifordopinion. Article '7&G, Section 148, of The Revised Civil Statutes, reads as follows: "For the purpose of aiding in the protection of the property, .and lives of the citizens of Cameron end ,iillacyCounties from further disastrous and calamitous overflows, and to conserve ant increase the revenues derived by the State from said counties, that part of the State ad valorem taxes, which is in excess of ten cents on the hundred dollars valua- tion of property subject to taxation, collected upon property and from persons in the county of Cameron, including the rolling stock belonging to railroad companies which shall be Hon. Geo. H. Sheppard, Feb. (3,lY39, Rage 2 O-50 ascertaineoand apportionedas provided by law, is hereby donated and granted by the State of Texas to the county of Cameron for a period of twenty-fiveyears, beginning San- uary 1, 1926, to be used by said county in part payment of interest and in creation of a sinking fund to pay the bonds of said county which shall be voted and issued as herein provided to obtain funds for the constructionof the necessary DreaMaters, levees, dikes, floodways, and drain- i:aysto protect the counties of Cameron and iiillacyfrom such disastrous and calamitousoverilows.ll Article 3937, Revised Civil Statutes, reads in part as follows: "Rach assessors (assessor)of taxes shall receive the follow- ing compensationfor ::isservices,which shall be estimated upon the total value of the property assessed as follows: For assessing the State and county taxes; on all sums for the first two million ($2,OCG,OGO.OG)dollars or less five cents (54) for each one hundred (~100.00~dollars'of roperty assessed; onall sums in excess of two million 2,OOO.COO.OO)dollars, and less than five million 5,000,OOO.OC)dollars, two and one-fourth cents (2&B) on each one ,hundred($lOO.OO~dollars; one-half of the above fee shall ae paid by the State, and one-half oy the county;.." Hr. ViilliXord advised "that in the opinion of this Department the Assessor-collectorof Cameron County is entitled to one-half of the commissionsprovided for in such article to be paid by the State and one-half of sucn commissionsto be paid by the County of Cameron." &ii.Armstrong's opinion advised "that in the opinion of this de- partment theabove quoted opinion correctly disposes of the questions cnerhin consideredand you are further advised that m the opl:lionof tni:;department the portion of the taxes donated and &ranted oy the State of Texas to the County of Caaaeronby virtue of Articles 7t'ZU-148,Revised civil Statutes of Te.xas,1925, shall be taken into consicerationand shall bear 'its portion or percentage of c!:‘: c:>mmissionsdue the assessor-collector~.l~ Apparently there is still confusion as to whether any part of the assessor's commissionsmentioned in Article 3937 is to be deducted from the amount ranted by the State to Cameron County to Article 7880, Section 148 . In this connection, it has Jeen the contention of the Comptroller that a proportionatepart of the assessor*s fees should be deducted from the amount so donated to Cameron county. On the other hand, it is the contention of the officials of Cameron County that all of the State's share of ad valorem taxes in excess of 1Cg on the $100.00 valuation collected in Cameron County should be granted back to the county without any deduction therefromon account of the assessor having been paid the commissionsmentioned above. iicnoraoletieo.E. Sheppard, Feb. 8, 1939, Page 3 o-50 Article .:;438, Revised Statutes, reads as follows: Wie Comptroller, on receipt of the rolls, shall give the assessor an order on the collector of his county ;'orthe a:neuntdue him ov the State for assessing the Statetaxes, to ee paid out o? the first money collected lor that year. ITiF: coiimlssiOners court SSail iSSue an order 0s t?::CGUIIty treasurer of their count*, to We assessor, ior r;tea.;rount due i.3,: ;i:rassessing Ciie ccunfy tax 0::ti-.eir ccuusy, to oe xl;::; cat or t:;c? 'irst BlOiltZy received frcn u;;ecollector CL