Hyundai Mobis Co., Ltd. v. Autoliv Asp, Inc.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

  HYUNDAI MOBIS CO., LTD., MOBIS ALABAMA,
                  L.L.C.,
                 Appellants

                           v.

                AUTOLIV ASP, INC.,
                       Appellee
                ______________________

                      2016-1896
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
01005.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES, Mayer Brown LLP, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by
ANDREW JOHN PINCUS, JONATHAN WEINBERG.

   KEITH E. BROYLES, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA,
argued for appellee. Also represented by WESLEY ACHEY,
PAMELA COUNCILL.
                 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



    PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,
Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 March 7, 2017                 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
      Date                    Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court