Enova Technology Corp. v. Seagate Technology (Us)

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

           ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
                   Appellant

                           v

 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC.,
       SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC,
                  Appellees
           ______________________

                      2016-1287
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
00683.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San
Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by
CHAO WANG; JANICE TA, Austin, TX.

    DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minne-
apolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by
LUCAS J. TOMSICH, JULIE WAHLSTRAND; CALVIN L. LITSEY,
East Palo Alto, CA; RICHARD M. MARSH, JR., Denver, CO.
                ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



   PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 March 20, 2017               /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
      Date                    Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court