This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see
Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note
that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the
official paper version filed by the Supreme Court.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 THOMAS E. MULLINS,
3 Petitioner-Appellant,
4 v. No. 36,118
5 MARY HELEN PEREZ f/k/a
6 MARY HELEN MULLINS,
7 Respondent-Appellee.
8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY
9 Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge
10 Thomas E. Mullins
11 Farmington, NM
12 Pro se Appellant
13 Tucker, Burns, Yoder & Hatfield
14 Mitchel S. Burns
15 Farmington, NM
16 for Appellee
17 MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 GARCIA, Judge.
19 {1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed
1 summary disposition. Both parties filed a memorandum indicating that they agree with
2 our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our notice of
3 proposed summary disposition, we reverse.
4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 ________________________________
6 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
7 WE CONCUR:
8 _______________________________
9 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
10 _______________________________
11 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
2