Cequent Performance Products v. Hopkins Manufacturing Corp.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

  CEQUENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.,
               Appellant

                           v.

  HOPKINS MANUFACTURING CORPORATION,
   THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INC.,
                  Appellees
           ______________________

                      2016-2701
                ______________________

    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-
00609.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   DAVID BOGDAN CUPAR, McDonald Hopkins LLC,
Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by
MATTHEW JOHN CAVANAGH.

   SCOTT R. BROWN, Hovey Williams LLP, Overland
Park, KS, argued for appellees. Also represented by
MATTHEW B. WALTERS.
               ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



    PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH,
Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 November 20, 2017            /s/ Peter R. Marksteinter
       Date                   Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court