FXLED IN
NO. O5-18-00567-CV Courl of Appeals
COURT OF APPEALS JUN 012018
RECEIVE
APPEA S
COURT OF FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Lisa Matz
Clerk, 5th District
JUN 0 12018 DALLAS,TEXAS
USA MATZ
CLERK, 5th DISTRICT
DARLENE C. BALISTRERI-AMRHEIN, APPELLANT
VS.
1. ATTORNEY LENNIE BOLLINGER, Ct at, WORMINGTON & BOLLINGER
LAW FIRM, et al,
2. PROSPERITY BANK, JO’EL ELONY, KEENA CLIFTON, NAOMI THAMES,
CHRISTINA SANDERS, SANDRA MCDONALD, SUSAN ALGER, et at;
3. MUSKAT, MAHONY, DEVINE LAW FIRM, ATTORNEY MICHELLE MAHONY,
ATTORNEY JOHN GRUFF, et at;
4. UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS , MAGISTRATE
JUDGE CHRISTINE NOWAK, JUDGE AMOS MAZZANT;
5. COBB, MARTINEZ, WOODLAND LAW FIRM, ATTORNEY CARRIE
JOHNSON PHANEUF, ct al;
6. COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO.6, JUDGE JAY BENDER, et at; APPELLEES
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING from the
COUNTVCOURTATMWNO. 6, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS
JUDGE DAN WILSON (Recused) & JUDGE JA V BENDER, PRESIDING
CA USE NO. 006-02654-2017
APPELLANT’S SECOND DOCKET STATEMENT
COMES NOW, Appellant, Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein to file a Second Docket Statement as
requested from this above Appellate Court under No. 05-18-00567-CV as follows briefly:
1) This Appeal was filed before learning Civil Practices & Remedies Code Chapter 11 only
Qualifies by Writ of Mandamus, so upon discovery Writ of Mandamus filed on May 25, 2018 in
this above Court of Appeals on this same lawsuit Cause No. 006-02654-20 17, along with In
Forma Pauperis Affidavit & there was no assigned numbers to the writ of Mandamus to date;
(Appellant / Realtor contacted Claudia at the Court to inform her of these latest developments &
discovery for Appeal Court’s information & then received post cards from Lisa Matz, which this
filing addresses) (All named Appellees denied “service of process” in conspiracy & cover up.)
2) APPELLANT BRIEFLY STATES THE REASON FOR THIS APPEAL UNLESS
WRIT OF MANDAMUS RULES OTHERWISE, BECAUSE LOWER COURT ORDERS
DO NOT APPLY TO APPELLANT I PLAINTIFF AS UNSUPPORTED & UNLAWFUL;
Lower Court Judge Dan Wilson, Defendants & Judge Jay Bender as it applies:
3) No proper jurisdiction outside of qualified limits of less than $100,000.00, disqualified;
4) Criminal Judge does not have jurisdiction on Probate matters & “legal malpractice:”
5) Considers jurisdiction as unnecessary & reckless in following rules of civil procedure;
6) Without jurisdiction, not permitted to preside in any lawsuit & sign any Orders;
7) Does not have ability to declare jurisdiction as it must be proven or not proper;
8) Can’t hear lawsuits over $100,000.00 & this lawsuit is at $200,000.00 or more as filed;
9) This assignment was an error admitted by Judge Mary Murphy as removed from office;
10) Discriminates against Plaintiff by age, disabilities, pro se litigant & incapacitated;
11) Does not respond to any of Plaintiffs Court filings, shows bias & prejudice;
12) Denies Americans with Disabilities Act / ADA federal law with Federal Court Orders;
13) Denies Plaintiff as “protected class,” who is medically incapacitated Medical Stay;
14) Refuses 5 Surgeons letters / statements of Plaintiff’s medical condition & treatments;
15) Reftises surgeons restrictions & “no work,” calls him & then is slandered in filings;
16) Sets up phone conference knowing Plaintiff in ER hospital, MRJ, CT Scans, Medicated;
17) Claims ADA accommodations, Plaintiff can’t appear, can’t walk, medicated & in pain;
18) Did not read or examine Plaintiffs Court filings as obvious from reposes to Attorneys;
19) Does not follow the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure & Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
20) No understanding of “Void Judgments” as void, legal nullity & no enforcements;
21) Does not enforce anything against Defendants & Attorneys showing bias & prejudice;
22) By denying “Medical Stay” is practicing medicine without a Texas Medical License;
23) Not interest in any evidence, any cited Rule of Law, not unbiased triers of facts;
24) Participates & allows Conspiracy with Defendants, Attorneys & Other Courts;
25) Allows the Federal Court Order of Reversed Judge Nowak to taint & influence case;
26) Allows peiury by Defendants & their Attorneys illegally as criminal Judge in case:\
27) Allows continued slander against Plaintiff illegally as a criminal Judge in case;
28) Allows continued cover up against Plaintiff illegally as a criminal Judge in case;
29) Allows Defendants & their Attorneys to attack Plaintiffs Civil Liberties in case;
30) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to attack Plaintiffs U.S Constitutional Rights in case;
31) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to confiscate all Plaintiffs Medical Records & HIPPA;
32) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to confiscate all Plaintiffs Sensitive Data Id theft;
33) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to Threaten Plaintiff, purpose of intimidation & case;
34) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to Harass Plaintiff unsafely had to move out of house;
35) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to Slander Plaintiff to others calling her a forger;
36) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to confiscate Plaintiffs sworn notarized statements;
37) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to Harass Business & person on Plaintiff notaries;
38) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to commit Perjury in lawsuit by false claims & filings;
39) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to Threaten to seize all Plaintiffs Social Security funds;
40) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to cover up legal malpractice by holding case file past
“statute of limitations” with accommodations, cause destruction of wrongful death, trust
Rights for estate & inheritance, which is videotaped from deceased Anthony J. Balistreri;
41) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to cover up crimes of assault, theft, property damages;
42) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to cover up filing in wrong court, denied right to jury
trial, refused communications for months, refused mediation, bias, prejudice with opposing
party, refused timely notice of Court Orders, no properjurisdiction, refused correction of
pleading, lied service of process, denied complete client file, reffised to add indispensable
parties, refused to examine evidence & prepare for trial, withdraws before hearing suit;
43) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to falsely claim trustee representing deceased Balistreri
unlawfully & when Attorney & video evidence is submitted to Court that portion of case is
reftised, because it’s automatic “legal malpractice” liabilities against them as matter of law;
44) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to engage in collusion & conspiracy with Federal
Court Attorneys & Judges to destroy both lawsuits for the same organized RICO affect;
45) Judge Bender refuses recusal, Judge Wilson recused self as disqualified by laws;
46) Judge Wilson demands responses, while Plaintiff is medicated, hospitalized & refused
all court filed evidence, then charges over $16,000 plus in Attorneys fees unlawfully;
47) Allows Defendants & Attorneys allowed to stalk Plaintiffs actions & whereabouts;
48) Falsely claims Plaintiffs filings disproves incapacity & medical condition, when they
were to prevent their false agenda, lies, conspiracy & cover up no matter the pain in case;
49) Allows Defendants & Attorneys to try & silence Plaintiff with false “vexatious litigant”
claims, with No Support, No Adverse Orders, separating pending or incorrect lawsuits;
50) Plaintiff proved unsupported, no adverse orders pending the Judge refused to consider
any of it allowing a hearing when Plaintiffs hospitalized, emergency, admitted to stop her
appearance, considered no filed Objections & no responses to any Plaintiffs Court filings;
51) Judges’ only responded to Defendants & their Attorneys filings, except denied recusal;
52) Conspiracy & “Fix was in” with Defendants & their Attorneys as privileged crimes for
false advertising, frauds, misrepresentations, abuses, non-communications, property theft,
refusal to return property, illegal court filings, undisclosed bias / prejudice with opposing
party, destruction, harms, losses & injuries in two lawsuits, now three, illegal acts, false
expertise, breach of implied contract & warranty, breach of Texas Bar License, breach of
Code of Professional Responsibilities, duty of care, duty as fiduciary, misconduct, lies,
fraud by inducements, lack of trust, lack of confidentiality, lack of education, fraud by
license & oath, failed obligations, lack of communications, cover up, breached Code of
Ethics & Code of Professional Responsibilities, no enforcement of rules, laws, rights, etc.
53) Judges failed enforcement of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, refused service of process
of all named Defendants & Attorneys as Ordered citations May 11, 2018 & Canon Laws;
54) Demands $160,000.00 plus in security & Attorneys Fees from known indigent as filed
In Forma Pauperis knowing no ability to pay as use to dismiss this lawsuit against
themselves & all Attorneys as named Defendants; (April 5 & May 14, 2018);
55) May 14, 2018 final Order of “vexatious litigant” came from Defendants Attorneys with
an questionable signature & typed date to prevent discovery of signer to prevent service of
process for all citations against themselves filed on May 11,2018; (Compare April 5,2018)
56) Can’t be “vexatious litigant” with no Adverse Orders, lawsuits Pending & Appealable
under Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 11 as required & only Writ of Mandamus
to decide any denial of Realtor Plaintiffs Substantial Equitable, Civil Liberties and all
Constitutional Rights, so to Appeal without Writ Order, would be against Order & Laws;
-C--
57) Court with no jurisdiction used this CPRC Chapter 11 falsely, knew it was false,
continued to use dismissal if money not paid timely unlawfully as motive & agenda from a
known poor indigent Plaintiff as abuses & illegal acts to prevent “due process” & dismiss;
58) This was all about extortion of money with intention of paying off the bribe for
favoritism & favorable Orders, unenforceable “void judgment” for unjust enrichments;
59) Judge’s Order was not mailed until May 18, 2018, when mailed same day or next day &
same false or questionable signatures to be examined, believed to be signed by another;
60) May 16, 2018 Plaintiff was informed about Federal Judge Christine Nowak’s 8 pLus
pages of rant & retaliation against Plaintiff filed in Judge Bender’s Court to taint case;
61) Federal Judge Nowak has been “reversed on all her Orders, statements & activities” as
that case has been reversed back to the Texas Courts by Judge Amos Mazzant 2 memos;
62) Conspirators are Cobb, Martinez, Woodland, Attorney Phaneuf. et al, Defendants
Attorney Lennie Bollinger & the Attorneys in the Law Firm of W& B, et al (Several
Attorneys), Muskat, Mahony, Devine, Attorney Michelle Mahony & Attorney Gruff,
Prosperity Bank, et al, unserved & served Defendants, Magistrate Judge Christine Nowak,
Judge Mazzant, Judge Bender, Judge Wilson & First Regional Mary Murphy removed;
63) Attorneys & Judges both Texas & Federal are not above or below the laws & when crimes
are committed as evident in this lawsuit, bribery & extortion are nothing to them;
64) Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff filed for Finding of Fact & Conclusion of Law & opposilion
from Attorney Phaneuf stated CPRC was not important, but money & dismiss this falsely
claimed meritless case. (Attorneys / Defendants no defense trickery for their crimes.)
65) Plaintiff filed Notice of Appeal & Docket Statement, but requested by Lisa Matz to file
docket statement within 10 days; (Original Notice file May 15, & Facts file May 16, 2018);
66) May 25, 2018 Realtor, Plaintiff filed necessary court filing for Writ of Mandamus &
inability Affidavit on paying all court costs for “good cause” reasons & approved by
multiple Texas & Federal Courts up to & including United States Supreme Court;
67) Plaintiff Social Security low income, unable to work, no other sources of income,
unmarketable home with $100,000.00 plus in needed repairs, Medical Bills, Medical
Clearances four times & 3 Surgeries for debt of about $250,000 on up & still running as
Plaintiff is on federal assislance & other federal programs, so no money for court costs;
68) Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff is incapacitated at this time, going through medical tests
for various disabilities, including cardiology to risk of death during these 3 surgeries;
69) Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff has been delayed neck / spine surgery due to medical
interferences from Courts, Judges, Attorneys / Defendants causing duplicate billing losses,
personal injuries to person, high risks, deuteriation of health, injuries, pain & liabilities;
70) June is multiple medical clearance tests & surgery is June 21, 2018, which results in
neck brace, no movement of head, up, down or sideways, no work, bone stimulations,
therapy, no driving, heavy duty medications, no notices timely, no court work, no court
responses, no timely demanded court filings to responses, objections or briefs as reported;
71) Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff’s mail is on hold with Post Office & whereabouts unknowii
at this time between, no home, hospitals & rehabilitation centers with medical care ability;
72) This is serious medical event, is protected by Americans With Disabilities Act / ADA &
Appellant, Realtor & Plaintiff is in a “protected class,” Federal Court Order as Disabled;
73) Recovery time for P’ surgery is until July 30, 2018 from neck! spine surgery, so this
needs to be put on inactive docket to accommodate Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff;
74) July 15, 2018 an update medical will be given to this Court as to medical status;
LAWSUITS PENDING & APPEALABLE AS FALSE CLAIMS RESULTS IN
CONSPIRACY, COVER UP, EXTORTION OF MONEY, NO “DUE PROCESS,
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & FRAUD UPON THE COURTS”
7
A) Prosperity Bank, et al—No Service of Process on all Defendants, Illegal Transfer from Texas
to Federal Court, Denied Medical Care, Threats, Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud Upon
Courts, False Filings, False Orders, Refused Recusal, Racism, Trickery, Tampered With Witness,
Tampered With Court Records & Swom Court Transcript, Abusive Deposition, Destruction of
Evidence, Refined Discovery, Exparte Communications, Unsupported No Orders, No Medical
Accommodations for Disabled, Discrimination of Age, Gender, Disability, Hostile Workplace,
Assault Upon Person, Theft of Wages, Under Reporting To Prevent Unemployment, denied
Worker’s Compensation, $732.00 of removed wages, forced to work off cLock & no wages.
Refused Medical Excuse, Retaliation & false Termination. Bullying, Blocking, Attacks,
Withholding W-2 IRS Reporting for 1 year, Fraudulent Settlement Offer To Report U.S.
Government for Advance Notice of Investigations, Conspiracy between 2 Defense Attorneys.
Obstruction to Prevent Service To Shift Judgment & Liability Over To Unsuspecting named
Employees, Management Not Addressing Complaints & Attempted Theft of $400.00, Tampered
With Court Records, Abusive Deposition, Removal of Court Filed Records, Paying Money To
Middle Eastern Without Proper Identification Against Homeland Security Rules, Destruction of
Videos As Evidence of Illegal Acts, Refusal of Discovery, Refusal of Employment File, Refusal
of Accountability of Wages, Fraudulent Claims & Information to Texas & Federal Agencies, Bank
Frauds, Violations of Most United States Labor Laws, Extort Money, Conflict of Interest, Bias,
Prejudice, Retaliation, Lack of Jurisdiction, Void Judgments, Frauds, Violated Laws, Multiple
Harassments, Personal Injuries, Denied Constitutional Rights, RICO, Medical Care Denied,
Threats, Slander & Character Assassination, with attempts to charge Defendant / Plaintiff for
Prosperity Bank, et al & their Attorneys Criminal Acts, Frauds, Choice as Probable Causes & this
lawsuit is still PENDING & APPEALABLE (does not justify any costs as plenty of theft.)
Filed December 6.2016 — Transferred banned Worker’s Compensation illegal January 8, 2018;
Federal Court reversed al Judge Nowak Orders & Remanded Lawsuit back to Texas Courts;
Time Frame 1 year. 5 months, 519 & still no proper service to all Defendants, no valid
lawsuit, no proper jurisdiction, no jury trial, no fairness, no medical care & no Justice
B) La Madeleine, Inc. Lawsuit — Refused & Ignored Federal Court Order of May 24, 1996,
Denied Medical Care, Threats, Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, Fraud Upon Courts, False
Filings Perjury, Fraud Orders, Denied Court Reporter to Prevent Appeals, Bribe of Judge For
Favorable Court Order, Refused Court Filings Service, Reffised Abatement, Refused Recusal,
Trickery, Tampered With Witness, Tampered With Court Records & Sworn Court Transcript,
Destruction of Evidence, Refused Discovery, Exparte Communications, Unsupported Orders,
Conflict of Interest, Bias, Prejudice, Retaliation, Lack of Jurisdiction. Void Judgments, Frauds,
Violated Laws, 4 Appeals Reversed, Illegal Sanctions Reversed, Harassments. Personal Injuries,
4 Operations Result Permanent Life Long Injuries, No Constitutional Rights, RICO, Criminal
Acts, Choice, Judicial Misconduct Conflict of Interest & Justice With 33 years of Relationship
with 6 + Defendants To This Lawsuit, so Recused & Disqualified by Law, ( 455a, b, § 144)
Frauds. This lawsuit was heard without reinstating the case lacking jurisdiction for 10 Years & 2
Appeals Notices of Legal Nullities & Void Judgments All Reversed as invalid that I won &
Probable Causes For This Lawsuit per Dept. of Justice still PENDING & APPEALABLE
Filed December 6, 1996— 0 years Bankruptcy Stay as legal nullity per Appellate Court for no
reinstatement. January 15, 2012, Bribe June 2012. Federal Lawsuit not heard & Appeal pending;
Time Frame La Madeleine Lawsuit —7,824 Days. 21 Years, 5 Months, 3 Days & still no
-
Service of Process, no discovery, no required evidence, no valid Appeal, no fairness, no enforced
Federal Order, no proper jurisdiction, noun bias trier of fact, no jury trial, no term insurance, no
Justice, “Bad Faith Intent,” & Choice with Theft of Long Term Disability Insurance, etc.;(Cost 0)
C) Winsley Home Lawsuit — Undisclosed, no proper filed deed, fraudulent taxes, theft of
money, conspiracy, cover up, fraudulent closing, fraudulent invalid real estate contract, violated
Probate Order, damages & theft of property, tampered with court records, theft of Appeal money
for court & evidence by blank pages, to create errors for enrichment by false Appeals, campaign
contributions for favorable Orders, denied service, Order after plenary powers expired, conflict
of interest, bias & prejudicial judge, abusive deposition, reftised insulin for days during
deposition, tampered with trustee Bankruptcy funds, no hearing in federal court, denied court
record for briefing references, ignored Probate Order, denied court filings, denied medical care,
denied errors corrections, no title policy, no refund on refused title policy, frauds from April 30,
2007, fraud taxes / appraisal, No final Texas Orders, filed in Federal Court, no hearing no fact
witness testimony, no evidence accepted before the Court, fraudulent statements, conspiracy,
cover up, RiCO with Judges, Ignored Probate Court Orders, no approval of sale, refused 2 years
after death for Probate Court Order denial of sale, invalid real estate contract, fraudulent home
inspection, fraudulent real estate commission, money moved across state lines, fraud closing,
refused documentations, refl.ised receipts of sale, refused valid deed, no title policy, theft of title
policy paid money of $3,300.00 by Defendants & Counsel Choice, no due process, No U.S. &
Texas Constitutional Rights, violate HIPPA Laws, Conspiracy to defraud as Professional Scam
Manager & Agents, Frauds, Probable Causes for this Lawsuit PENDING & APPEALABLE
Filed May 19, 2008 in Collin County Courts, No Final Order, moved to U.S. Northern District
Court, no hearings, no proper jurisdiction, no fact witnesses, all denied court filings, denied
Medical Care, Refused all Evidence, Refused Court Record for timely briefing, false claims to
silence, reported to Department of Justice, informed to refile in U.S. Eastern District Court, no
service of process, no summons, no examination of evidence, extort money to Appeal, Refused
Recusal, tampered with Court records, etc. pending before named Defendant Court of Appeals;
Time Frame —3,642 Days, 9 years, 11 Months & 20 Days, still no fairness, no due process, no
valid lawsuit, no jury trial, no Justice, “Bad Faith Intent,” Bad Choices etc. (Costs 0)
,
U) Attorney Lennic Bollinger, Ct al & Wormington & Bollinper Law Firm, et al:
Lawsuit # I - Fraud Advertising, Fraud Representations, Ignored Statute of Limitations &
Expired as Wrongful Death Case File is held & expired, Returned unexamined, no
communications, lost rights for being drugged & beaten to death losing 46 pounds in 6 weeks as
starved, Medicare Frauds, Bollinger et al held file from June 2015 to Nov.2015 knowing Statute
/0.
of Limitations ended Sept. 24, 2015, falsely claims trustee, next of kin & daughter has no rights to
seek counsel for representation of father’s wrongful death, personal injuries, abandoned, etc., while
Defendants never inspected any documents in the demanded case file for months & kept;
Lawsuit #2 — Fraud Representations, filed in wrong court that lacks jurisdiction, files incomplete
& incorrect pleadings, refuses all corrects, lies about service of process time & place, refuses
Mediation Orders, refuses to add all pleadings stated claims of Assault, theft of property, damages
to home, loss of 5 months of rent, fraud misrepresentations, con man scam, scheme & lies of “bad
faith” intent & premeditation, driving drunk after 6 months jail time incarceration with fines &
•fraudulent used to stay as renter upstairs in home to take advantage of me, while making threats,
etc., both lawsuits represented by Attorney Bollinger & Wormington & Bollinger, et al Law Firm,
who withdrew days before jury trial, no jury trial due to lack ofjurisdiction, no signed Order
causing no Appeal resulting in fraudulent Attorneys fees & “void judgments” to be re-sued, while
multiple Judges claimed I had “good evidence” to win injury trial & reported criminal charges;
This lawsuit was by bad choices of Defendants Bollinger & Law Firm & Defendant Schroeder,
who he appeared to have a fondness for in representation & wanted me to settle this $13,200.00
lawsuit & Assault for just $200.00. This above lawsuit is the result of the “legal malpractice” of
Defendants Attorney Bollinger & Wormington & Bollinger Law Firm that is still Bad Choices &
Probable Causes, to Sue, not frivolous lawsuits or Adverse Orders; PENDING & APPEALABLE
Time Frame — 194 days, OR 6 months & 12 days for this lawsuit does not justify any costs
75) 1 know the above lawsuits A to D of my own personal knowledge from 1996 to the present
day of this current filing & any other lawsuits claimed by Conspirators Attorney Carrie Phaneut
Attorney Mahony & their respective Law Firms are totally false, Obstruction of Justice & Fraud
Upon The Courts by commit Perjury as stated in their Court filings & deliberate acts by dates;
//.
76) 1 know for a fact there is no Adverse Orders as required under Civil Practice & Remedies
Code Chapter 11 to apply to any “vexatious litigant” Orders that are not supported & prejudicial;
77) May 14, 2018 Judge Jay Bender signed the Order to this lawsuit on the false “vexatious litigant
claim as final judgment & charges all cost to Plaintiff as an in forma pauperis on an Obstruction
of Justice & “Fraud Upon the Courts” to protect the Attorneys & himself in this lawsuit for all
corruption, in less than 1 hour notice of the suit against all participants in this judicial conspiracy
as an attempt to silence Plaintiff, Realtor & Appellant taking advantage of her health conditions;
78) Appellant is requesting that this Court Record Cause No. 006-02654-2017 be examined &
considered for the Writ of Mandamus & this Appeal as requested from the lower Court with
Affidavit of In Forma Pauperis submitted for complete court record, filings, exhibits & evidence
79) Court Record contains Sworn Affidavits, Court Filings, Evidence, Accounting of Attorneys
Fees, during Conspiracy, Collusion & Cover Up to “Obstruct Justice & commit “Frauds Upon
Courts, No Jurisdiction, Discriminations, Exparte Communications, Trickery, No Due Process,
Bias, Prejudice, Retaliation, Civil Liberties, Taints & Constitutional Rights violated & denied;
RELIEF SOUGHT & OTHER VIOLATIONS OF RULES & LAWS UNFAIRLY &
MISCARRAGES OF JUSTICE
80) Reversal of All Orders, Costs & “Vexatious Litigant” claims, Service of all named
Defendants, Move lawsuit to proper jurisdiction with a Judge who is qualified as unbiased trier
of fact, enforcement of all rules, laws, due process & all U.S. & Texas Constitutional Rights.
Costs of all duplicate bills to Medicare as liable & cost for interference in medical care, pain,
suffering, conspiracy, threats, loss of privacy, Civil Right & Liberties liabilities & payment of all
Court Costs by Appellees for violations committed causing this Appeal as applicable rights. This
includes pain, suffering, personal injuries caused to Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff& no Medical
Stay as “protected class” Disabled American with Federal Court Ordered Disabilities. Medically
out & unavailable all June, 2018 & all July, 2018, so no dirty tricks, no demands & no responses.
OTHER VIOLATIONS OF RULES & LAWS UNFAIRLY & MISCARAGES OF JUSTICE:
[J]udges must be able to rule in accordance with the law which they believe applies to the case
before them, free from extraneous considerations of punishment or reward. This is the central
value ofjudicial independence. That value is threatened when ajudge confronted with a choice
of how to rule-and judges are confronted with scores of such choices every day-must ask not
“which is the best choice under the law as I understand it,” but “which is the choice least likely to
result in judicial discipline?”
On the other hand, the code ofjudicial conduct does require ajudge to “respect and comply with
the law,’ 4 to “be faithifil to the law and maintain professional competence in it,” 5 and to
“accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right
to be heard according to law.” 6 Moreover, it would be incongruous if the principle “ignorance of
the law is no excuse” applies to everyone but those charged with interpreting and applying the
law to others. Thus, while mere legal error does not constitute misconduct, “[jJudicial conduct
creating the need for disciplinary action can grow from the same root as judicial conduct creating
. .‘
potential appellate review. . This article will review both cases in which a finding of
misconduct was based on legal error and cases in which legal error was not sanctioned to
describe the “something more” that transforms legal error into judicial misconduct.
The possibility of an appellate remedy for a particular judicial act, therefore, does not
automatically and necessarily divest the judicial discipline authority ofjurisdiction to review the
same conduct
Judicial independence requires a judge to commit to following constitution, statutes, common
law principles & precedent without intrusion from or intruding upon branches of government.
Judicial discipline for legal error can often result in removal but may simply lead to a reprimand,
censure, or suspension.
Remarks imply a bias, that is, a preconception or predetermined point of view about the case,
parties or issues before the court & judge that could impugn the impartiality and open-minded
ness necessary to make correct and sound determinations in the application of the law.
Noting that ajudge “may comment on the law & even express disapproval of the law, as long as
his or her fairness & impartiality are not compromised,”
If ajudge fails to exercise judicial discretion, “mere legal error” rule is not a defense to a charge
of misconduct based on resulting decision. Such a decision is not entitled to protection ofjudicial
independence principles. The reasonable judge of our standard must be reasonable both in
prudently exercising his judicial powers & in maintaining his professional competence.
Although there are cases in which misconduct has been found based on one erroneous decision,
most cases in which judicial error was elevated to level ofjudicial misconduct involved more
than 1 example of legal error & pattern is one of identified exceptions to “mere legal error” rule.
Presence of bad faith can render an exercise of legal judgment judicial misconduct. “Bad faith”
in this context means “acts within the lawifil power of ajudge which nevertheless are committed
/3.
for a corrupt purpose, i.e., for any purpose other than the faithful discharge ofjudicial duties.
“Even just a single error can lead to a finding of misconduct if judge was acting in “bad faith”
or intentionally failed to follow the law,” as in this lawsuit.
If a judge acts out of pique or to exact revenge, judge’s decision loses protection of ‘mere legal
error” rule with conspiracy, frauds, bias, prejudice, obstruction ofjustice & fraud upon courts,
schemes, no jurisdiction, retaliation, criminal acts, no judicial duties & no immunities exist. An
intentional failure to follow the law, even with a benign motive, constitutes bad faith and
consequently judicial misconduct
“Egregious” legal errors have been identified as a type of error that justifies disciplinary as well
as appellate review. 132 “Egregious” implies something different than bad faith or a pattern of
error as those are listed as separate grounds for departing from the mere legal error rule.
Although “egregious” is a subjective term, the most obvious example of an egregious error is a
denial of constitutional rights.
Findings ofjudicial misconduct have also been made where ajudge conducted a single civil case
in a manner that departed completely from the usual procedures required by adversary system.
Darlene C. Balistred-Amrhein was stripped of right to notice and her right to be heard, ADA
accommodations, Civil Liberties & U.S. Constitutional Rights & Applicable law totally ignored.
Although courts & commissions are generally reluctant to second guess ajudge’s decision to
control the courtroom through use of contempt power, failure to adhere to proper procedures
when exercising contempt power is cognizable in judicial discipline process given liberty
interests at stake. Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein never met Judges as exparte with attorneys only.
“In the absence of fraud, corrupt motive or bad faith, the Commission shall not take action
against ajudge for making findings of fact, reaching a legal conclusion or applying law as he
understands it. Claims of error shall be considered only in appeals from court proceedings.”
The rule allows for protection ofjudicial independence & many exceptions allow commissions
& reviewing courts to hold judges accountable for decisions that are clearly contrary to law, that
were reached without following procedures that confer legitimacy & credence upon judicial
actions, that represent an exercise of discretion motivated by bad faith, or that reflect repeated
legal error cannot be attributed to an honest mistake. (No jurisdiction, denied rights & frauds.)
Obstruction of justice is criminal offense of interfering with (I) administration or process of
law, (2) withholding material information or false testimony, or (3) harming or intimidating a
juror. witness, party. or officer(s) of law.
The Crime of Obstruction of Justice generally includes crimes committed by judges, prosecutors,
attorneys, general. & elected officials. It’s considered misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance
in conduct of the office. However, prosecutors & attorneys commit obstruction ofjustice when
they fail to prosecute judges & other government officials for malfeasance, misfeasance or
nonfeasance in oflice. (Crimes have consequences & no one is above or below the law!)
Obstruction charges are laid when it is discovered non-suspect person has lied to investigating
officers. Obstruction charges can also be laid if a person alters or destroys physical evidence,
even ifs/he was under no compulsion to produce such evidence, at any time. Obstruction of’
justice is a broad concept that extends to any effort to prevent execution of lawful process or the
administration of justice in either a criminal or civil matter as in this lawsuit.
Obstructive conduct also includes intimidation o[’potential witnesses or retaliation against actual
witnesses, preparation of false testimony or other evidence, or interference with jurors or other
court personnel. The purpose of criminal obstruction statutes is to protect the integrity of legal
proceedings & at same time, protect those individuals who participate in such proceedings.
Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been
made to the court. or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court
has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice as in this lawsuit.
Some examples of fraud on the court include:
• Fraud in service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party)
• Corruption or influence of a court member or oflicial
• Judicial fraud
• Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in
efforts to obstruct the judicial process
• “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through court system
Fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-
appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the judicial machinery” itself.
Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud
on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled. Any ruling or
judgment that the court has issued will be void. The case will usually need to be retried with
different court officials, often in an entirely different venue.
For official(s) who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down
from their position & may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or jail time. It
could result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney(s) being disbarred, or a judge
being removed from service.
If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required
to excuse themselves from the case, & different official must be appointed. In some jurisdictions.
a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as
two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. Fraud on the court can be devastating, especially for
a party that may be waiting to receive relief from the court.
Fraud on the court should embrace only that species of fraud which does or attempts to. subvert
the integrity of the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court ) (citation
omitted); Kerwit Med. Prods., Inc. v. N. & H. Instruments, Inc., 616 F.2d 833, 837 (11th Cir.
‘s-i
1980). Fraud on the court must involve an unconscionable plan or scheme which is designed to
improperly influence the court in its decision Davenport RecyclingAssocs. r. CLR.. 220
F.3d 1255, 1262 (11th Cir. 2000) (alleged fraud on tax court). â€wlt has been found only in those
instances where the fraud vitiates the court’s ability to reach an impartial disposition of the case
before it, there was fraud: there was fraud on the court; and there was a conspiracy t defraud.
This fraud was intentional. The fraud was perpetrated by officers of the court. Herring, 424
P.3d at 386. A judge is an officer of the court, as are all members of the Bar. A federal judge is a
federal judicial officer, paid by the federal government to act impartially and lawftilly. Ajudge is
not the court. People ; Zajk. 88 Ill.App.3d 477, 410 N.E.2d 626(1980). Chief Justice John
Marshall acknowledged that a court may grant relief from judgment where a new matter “clearly
proves it to be against conscience to execute a judgment, and of which the injured party could
not have availed himself before judgment. Marhie Ins. (‘o. ofAlexandria v. Hodgson, 11 U.s.
(7 Cranch) 332, 336 (1813). lie further emphasized that an Article Ill court can grant relief
where “equity of the applicant [is] free from doubt,” and where ajudgment “would be against
conscience/or /1w peiwon 11110 has obtained i/to avail himself” Id. at 337 (emphasis supplied).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 60(d) as well as independent actions in equity may
all be used to seek to vacate orders and judgments due to fraud upon the courts.One of the
essential elements of an independent action in equity is a showing of the absence of any adequate
remedy at law. Bankers Mortgage (‘a. v. United States, 423 F.2d 73, 79 (5th Cir. 1970). The
Supreme Court has further noted that an independent action in equity should be available only to
prevent a grave miscarriage ofjustice. United States v. Beggedj’, 524 U.S. 38,47(1998). The
absence of any adequate remedy at law. In re Macline Israel, Inc.. 48 F. App’x 859, 863 n.2 (3d
Cir. 2002) (quoting Nat’l Stir. Co. ofN.Y. v. State Bank of Humboldt, 120 F. 593. 599 (8th Cir.
1903)). “[A]n independent equitable action for relief from judgment may only be employed to
prevent manifest injustice.” Id. at 863. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322
U.S. 238 (1944), and United States v. Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38 (1998), this Court’s leading recent
discussions of fraud upon the court.
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhcin has experienced all as stated above, crimes, illegal acts & “void
judgments” by Judges Jay Bender, Dan Wilson, Mary Murphy, all named Attorneys within this
lawsuit for this case, Scams, Scheme of Conspiracy, Frauds, Obstruction of Justice & Fraud
Upon Courts, without applications of rules, civil liberties, rights & laws. With all stated claims &
merits of this lawsuit it is obvious that trickery, illegal & unethical tactics must be used with no
defense to dismiss this court filed lawsuit, which the judges on in on to protect unethical &
criminal acts of these Attorneys in violation of Professional Code of Conduct, CCBE & Canon
Rules violated. The attorneys were knowing participants in fraud on the court. Bogus
documents placed into record. Lies told under oath in affidavits & in various filings with courts,
& schemes concocted to attempt to cover-up certain falsehoods. Attorneys involved & promoted
which needs to be reversed, heard before un bias trier of fact, proper jurisdiction, all Defendants
“service of process” to be a valid lawsuit with fair & just outcome by Rules, Laws, Civil Rights,
United States & Texas Constitutions, as disabled person “protected class” with 5 surgeons letters
of Medical Stay, medical restrictions denied ADA in this Court by all Court named Defendants,
Judges, Attorneys, Law Firms, Respondents, Appellees associated to this lawsuit & all Appeals
/4.
IN CONCLUSION & PRAYER
81) Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff prays for smooth surgery & recovery as the neck is opened to
spine & some bone is removed to free up nerves & spinal column, which requires medical
restrictions, braces, therapy & bone growth stimulations with constant medical attention as
elderly diabetic “high risk,” so peace & no worries is what is needed with good care. Appellant,
Realtor, Plaintiff prays this last docket statement is correct as can’t do another. Appellant,
Realtor, Plaintiffs prays the Courts, Judges, Justices & Attorneys I Defendants understand the
gravity of these circumstances & if thought is we are off the hook if she dies, guess again, as you
have become more liable as my family & estate will sue for all liabilities caused for wrongful
death with Ethical Attorneys. Merits of this lawsuit requires “due process” by Rights & Rule of
Laws. It is no wonder there is no defenses & no one wants to receive “service of process,”
refusing citations / summons, so used FRAUDS to stop this lawsuit! Denied “service of process”
is apart of Writ of Mandamus & this Appeal as Docketed for Conspiracy, Cover Up, Collusion,
“Obstruction of Justice” & Fraud Upon Courts As Reported to authorities, so it appears Writ of
Mandamus should be decided first to reverse false “vexatious litigant” fraud Order & costs to see
if an Appeal is necessary to decide other legal matters. Appellant is not available for Oral
Argument at this time. The Final Order is invalid, incomplete, conspiracy, cover up, Obstruction
of Justice, Fraud Upon Courts & illegal with no proper jurisdiction.
Appellant prays for fairness, due process, unbiased triers of fact as mailer of laws. rules under
colour of Laws & enforcement of all existing Laws, Liberties & Rights, no “conflicts of
interest,” bias, prejudice, unfair advantages, retaliations, no jurisdiction & unenforceable “void
judgments” in this lawsuit as this is a Prime Lawsuit of Corruption, Treason War Against United
States Constitution, Disgraceful Misconduct Against Congress, Litigants, Disabled, Indigent, No
Due Process, United States & Te Judicial Systems! (Medical Exhibits A to F Attach
May 28, 2018
C
Respectfully submitted, Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein, Appellant, Realtor, Plai
s7
2018-03-07 11:13 rexas Back Institute 9726035068 >> 972-547 0448 P 2/15
• Texas Back Institute
February 6,2012
Re: Darlene Amthein
To: Whom n:May Concern,
ated on 1126/18 sccondazy to cervical
Ms. Darlene Amthein is a 7lyr old female Who was rvaln
thy, M9?.3 1 osseous stenosis of neural
and lumbar related diagnoses: M47i2 cervical myelooa of
. atd M99.33 Osseous stenosis
canai of cervical region, M43A6 hnnbarspondylolisthesis
surgIcal interven&n as they are
neural canal of lumbarregion. These diagnoses do require ybcandnence and setniinn, in
so! rzth
currently thtthig hodfljcfficcHan n&h comp)
dination which can pose ateatfor somebody
additIon to increasIng diffidulty with gait and coor
adtomodi’ her daily aethifleg sbaIs cunentiy
with a diagnosis of cervical myeiopathy. Pthas]i cen5cal ithopatby with aposteñorspin&
address her
ambulatin2 with a cane. FIrst. i would surgery is medicaflynecessazy in order to correct the
fusion from C3-4 with l3minectomy; this vertD bral smbfliw. Then. I’d need m address her
ical stcuo sis whil e pwv iding
level of severe cerv oximately 6
i post op disabilitytimewill be appr
lumbar issues with an open 360 L4-SLHertota her
necessary in orderThr us to evaluate her
rativ ely1 Rou dne follo w us will be
months post-ope urgent work up ss
i to work statu s closerto that 6 mon th vast-op marker. Pt did require thatmore
remn conmctiny offices in the events
daffn it1y deter iorad . Plea se is 972-
symptoms have
in the even ts that c]arl ficad ou is needea. Ourphone number
information is necessary or
160.
608-5000; our fax numberis 97240S-5
RepeCthtJ
Rajesh a Arak%M.D
Texas Back Institute
February23, 2018
Re: Darlene Amrhein
To: Whom It May Concea
ated on 1/26/18 secondaiy to cervical
Ms. Darlene Amrhein is a llyr old female who was evalu
thy, $Q31 osseous stenosis of neural
and lumbar related diagnoses: M47J2 cervical rnyelopa
and M99.33 osseous stenosis of
of cervical region, M43J6 lumbar spondylolisthesis,
ire surgical intervention as they are
neural canal oflumbar regIon. These diagnoses do requ zyincon±Iaence a drefention, in
plaints of udna
cinrently afiècüng bodily fimcfion with com
dinafiouwbich caxtpose atbreat for somebody
addition to increasing difficulty with gait and coor
bad to modifyher daily aedvities; she is currently
with a diagnosis of cervical myelopathy. Pthas
cervical myelopathy with a postedor spinal
ambulating with a cane. First, I would address her
medically necessary in order to correct the
fusion from C34 with laminectomy this surgery is
bral stability. Then, r d need to address
her
re cerv ical steno sis whil e pwv iding verte
level of seve oximately 6
ar issue s with an open 360 TA-S i. Hertotalpost op disabffitrlime.wfllbe appr
lumb ateher
ups will be necessaq in order forts to evalu
mouths post-operatively. Routine follow nt work up as her
n to work statu s close r to that 6 mon th post-op marker. Pt did require urge
retur as she cannot
Currently, pt is to rewthn off work
symptoms have definitely deteriorated. pahtology Pt
her usua l work dutie s seco ndar y to the severity of her cervical and lumbar
com plete ical intervention and
to rema in off work in light of the fact that we are prepaiing for surg se keep pt
is lead towards further deterioration. Plea
coul d exac erba te her pain and
continued work ssary orinthe
work . Plea se cont act my offic es in the events thatmore iuibrmaEon is nece ber is 972-
off of e number is 972-608-5000; oi fx
num
events that clarification is needeth Our phon
608.5160.
Respecthul*
F p°J
Rajesh G. Ajakal, MD.
2018-03-27 12:35 Texas Back Institute 9726085068 >> 972 547 0448 P iii
F4
Texas Back Institute
March 27, 2018
Re: Darlene Amrhein
To: Whom It May Concern,
Ms. Darlene Amrhein is a patient of mine who is scheduled to undergo a Posterior Cervical
Fusion from C3-4 with Laminectomy and Allografi on 4/26/18; no court work is to be done at
that time. Currently, pt is to remain off work as she cannot complete her usual work duties
secondary to the severity of her cervical and lumbar pahtology; Pt S to remain off work in light
of the fact that we arc preparing for surgical intezvention and continued work could exacerbate
her pain and lead towards further deterioration, Please keep pt off of work. Please contact my
offices in the cvcnts that more information is necessary or in the events that clarification is
needed. Our phone number is 972-608-5000; our fax number is 972-608-5160,
Resp
Rajesh 0. Arakal, M.D.
.--
-
-
:itute 9726085068 >> 972 547 0448 P ‘Vi
2018-04-10 15:41 Texas Back I (Ufl5
1/D”
Texas Back InstitutC
April10, 2018
Re: Darlene Amrhein
To: Whom It May Concern,
BILITY TO WORK.
THIS IS A REPEATED NOTIFICATION OF INA
is scheduled to undergo a Posterior Cervical
Ms. Darlene Amrhein is a patient of mine who at
Fusion from C3-4 with Laminectomy and All
ograft on 4/16/18; no court work is to be done
work duties
k as she cannot complete her usual
that time. Cunently, Pt IS to remain off wor light
secondary to the severity of her cervical and
lumbar pahtology ptis to remain off work in
k coul d exac erba te
of the fact that we are preparing for surg
ical intervention and continued wur
w the
ion. Please keep Pt off of work and revie
her pain and lead towards further deteriorat offic es in the events
statement P]ease contact my
multitude of prior letters which support this phon e
info rma tion is nece ssary or in the events that clalification is needed. Our
that more
is 972-608-5 160.
number is 972-608-5000; our fax number
Respectfuf%
Rjesh G Arakal. M.D.
e ,..,-
‘TL, Texas Heafth
(d Physicians Group
TEXAS CENTER FOR JOINT
REPLACEMENT
6020 West Parker Rd
Suite 470
Piano TX 75093-8338
Phone: 972-608-8868
Fax: 972-608-0366
Date: 5/9/2018 Roger H. Emerson, Jr., MD
Richard D. Reitman, MD
Kwame Ennin, MD
Karim Elsharkawy. MD
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
RE: RETURN TO WORK STATUS
under my care. She will be
This letter is to certify That Darlene Carol Amrhein is a patient
of the right knee. My request
undergoing surgery with me due to internal derangement
ns, please give our
to have her off of work until further notice, If you have any questio
office a phone call.
Sincerely,
Dr. Reitman
Page 1 of4
..L T3aylorScorr&\Xfhirc
AFTER VISIT SUMMARY -- ‘1 HLrHtExasp;4ovIt?’eIuetcot1.;
Darlene C. Amrhein DaB: 7/18/1946
j 5/24/2018 3:15 PM 9 BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE LEGACY HEART CENTER 469-800-6300
Cr-
Instructions from David A Schwartz, MD TodayTs Visit
•
•
Discontinue order for myocardial PET scan.
Instead, schedule dobutamine echocardiogram, next available.
() You saw David A Schwartz,
MD on Thursday May 24,
2018. The following issues
• Follow-up appointment in 3 months.
were addressed:
• Cardiac risk for surgery to be determined as a result of the
• Heart murmur
dobutamine echocardiogram.
• Bifascicular block
• Dyspnea on exertion
Return in about 3 months • Dyslipidemia associated with type 2
(around 8/24/2018). diabetes mellitus (HCC)
• Type 2 diabetes mellitus without
complication, with long-term current
use of insulin (HCC)
Whats Next
You currently have no upcoming appointments scheduled. Blood BMI
0 Pressure 38 55
120/72
a Preventive Care IZiSi Weight P1 Height
Topic —— - —
-
Due
-
---
204 1Jj 61’
Aic 07/18/1946
n Oxygen
07/18/1946 li Pulse
Hepatitis C Screening for Baby Boomers ‘
\\ 1/ 81 Saturation
Diabetic Foot Exam 07/18/1956 95%
Diabetic Eye Exam -- -
07/18/1956 -
Urine Microalbumin - - —
07/18/1956
07/18/1958
Mood Screen
Medicare Weilness Visit 07/18/1964
tetanus Booster Vaccines -
07/18/1965
Lipid Screening 07/18/1986
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Colonoscopy 07/18/1996
07/18/2006
Zoster Vaccine --
--
07/18/2011
Osteoporosis Screening - - - -
07/18/2011
Pneurnococcal Vaccines (1 of 2 PCV13)-
Breast Cancer Screening 06/01/2018
Seasonal tnfluenza Vaccine (Season Ended) 10/01/2018
\i BSWFIealtb
Allergies as of 5/24/2018 Our records indicate that you have
Todinated Contrast- Oral And Iv Dye declined MyBSWHealth signup. If you
Levofloxacin would like to sign up for
Prednisone MyBSWHealth, please call 855-691-
0180 to obtain an activation code.
p
Printed at 5/24/18 4:04 PM Page 1 of4
Darlene C. Amrhein (MRN: 7495726)
VERIFICATION I AFFIDAVIT
No. 05-18-00567-CV
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF COLLIN
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Appellant Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein, who swore in
her capacity & indivIdually on her sworn oath, deposed and said she prepared and signed
Appellant’s Second Docket Statement, Civil Docket Statement & Attached Affidavit.
This information as referenced and stated within is true and correct and of Darlene C.
Balistreri-Amrhein’s own personal knowledge to the best of her ability & documented.
This state and or federal filing is for purpose of “due process,” fairness, “due process” &
Justice under State and Federal Laws & presented in applicable Courts attached as sited
for consideration of this Court filing.
ie.
Darlene C. Balistreri-Amrhein, Appellant, Pro Se
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TOME, BEFORE ME: ON 5)%g ,2018to
certify which witness my hand and official seal.
fl4AMCth frfrrCkc/)
Notary Public of Texas (Printed Name)
SEAL:
MYCOnThSSInEX*CS
‘Z14k 1kaut4
Notary Public of Texas (Signature)
Commission Expires /o .
/g.
Certificate of Service
A true and correct and copy of Appellant’s Second Docket Statement has been served by
certified mail through United States Post Office on or about May 28, 2018 to following:
Court of Appeals Fifth District Court, et al (Appeal No. 05-18-00567-CV)
600 Commerce Street, Suite # 200
Dallas, TX. 75202-465 8 Certified Mail 7016 1970 0001 1779 9900
Judge Jay Bender & County Court at Law No. 6, et al
Russell A. Steindam Courts Building,
2100 Bloomdale Road, Suite 30354
Collin County, Texas 75071 Certified #7016 1970 0001 1779 9917
Cobb, Martinez, Woodland, Attorneys Elflch, Phaneuf. et al, Attorney Lennie Bollinger, W&B
Law Firm, et a]
1700 Pacific Aye, Suite #3100
Dallas, TX. 75201 Certified Mail 701619700001 17799924
United States Easlem District Court, Judges Nowak & Mazzant, et al
7940 Preston Road. Room 101
PIano, Texas 75024 Certified Mail 7016 1970 0001 1779 9931
Muskat, Mahony, Devine, Grnft et al & Prosperity Bank, et al
1201 Louisiana Street, Suite # 850
Houston, TX. 77002 Certified Mail 701619700001 17799948
Respectfully submitted, Darlene C. Balisfreri-Amrhein, Appellant, Realtor, Plaintiff, Pro Se
t;%
%/2