Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC17-738
____________
ORLANDO NOA,
Petitioner,
vs.
FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION,
Respondent.
[July 5, 2018]
CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District
Court of Appeal in Noa v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n, 215 So. 3d 141 (Fla.
3d DCA 2017), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.
Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was
improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss
this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and
LAWSON, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND,
IF FILED, DETERMINED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct
Conflict of Decisions
Third District - Case No. 3D16-1367
(Miami-Dade County)
Paul B. Feltman of Alvarez, Feltman & DaSilva, P.L., Coral Gables, Florida,
for Petitioner
Hinda Klein of Conroy Simberg, Hollywood, Florida,
for Respondent
-2-