In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-18-00211-CV
___________________________
DAVID D. SCOTT AND MARY J. SCOTT, Appellants
V.
ROBERT G. WEST, THYRA WEST, JUDITH C. CLARK, SALLIE CLINGMAN,
GREGORY P. MILLER, GAYE MILLER, JONATHAN BAYLES, AND AMY
BAYLES, Appellees
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014-001905-2
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Pittman, JJ.
Per Curiam
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
We have considered the petition for permissive appeal of Appellants David D.
Scott and Mary J. Scott. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d), (f) (West
Supp. 2017); Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a).
We grant the petition in part.1 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.
§ 51.014(f). We will determine only the narrow issue identified by the trial court as
the controlling question of law: “the question of whether Plaintiffs or Defendants
have the legal duty to repair or replace the subject retaining wall.” To the extent
Appellants seek to expand the issue or to obtain a broader ruling, that relief is denied.
Appellants’ notice of appeal is deemed filed today. See id.; Tex. R. App. P.
28.3(k). The appeal will be governed by the rules for accelerated appeals. See Tex.
Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1, 28.3(k). Appellants
must file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(k).
Per Curiam
Delivered: September 20, 2018
1
Today, we also dismiss Appellants’ attempted traditional appeal in this matter.
See Scott v. West, No. 02-18-00156-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 20, 2018, no pet.
h.) (mem. op.).
2