in the Interest of K. L. W., Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Appellate case name: In the Interest of K.L.W., A Child Appellate case number: 01-18-00485-CV Trial court case number: 2017-02559J Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County On March 22, 2019, appellants Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne Whitfield filed a pro se “Motion for Stay of Mandate (for time for nunc pro tunc hearing, fraud upon the court, both in this court and in the trial court)” in this case and the related 01-18-00311-CV. With respect to this case, this Court’s judgment was issued on December 5, 2018, appellants’ motions for rehearing/en banc reconsideration were denied on December 20, 2018, their petitions for review were denied on February 15, 2019, and their motions for rehearing were denied by the Texas Supreme Court on March 22, 2019. Under Rule 18.2, “[a] party may move to stay issuance of the mandate pending the United States Supreme Court’s disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari” if this Court “finds that the grounds are substantial and that the petitioner or others would incur serious hardship from the mandate’s issuance if the United States Supreme Court were later to reverse the judgment.” TEX. R. APP. P. 18.2. However, appellants’ “Motion for Stay of Mandate” fails to assert “substantial” grounds for staying the mandate, such as by alleging a “substantial federal question for consideration” in their cert. petition and that they will incur “serious hardship” if this Court issues its mandate and the U.S. Supreme Court later reverses the judgment. See, e.g., McIntosh v. Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners, No. 07-12-00196-CV, 2014 WL 4656628, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Sept. 17, 2014, Order) (per curiam) (granting motion to stay mandate because pending cert. petition “presented a substantial federal question”), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 722 (U.S. Dec. 1, 2014). Accordingly, appellants’ “Motion for Stay of Mandate” is denied. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Justice Laura C. Higley___________ x Acting individually Acting for the Panel Date: ___March 28, 2019___