MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED
this Memorandum Decision shall not be
regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 05 2019, 10:13 am
court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Yvette M. LaPlante Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
LaPlante LLP Attorney General of Indiana
Evansville, Indiana
Samantha M. Sumcad
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Percy Scott, September 5, 2019
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
19A-CR-196
v. Appeal from the Vanderburgh
Circuit Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable David Kiely, Judge
Appellee-Plaintiff Trial Court Cause No.
82C01-1712-F3-7696
Baker, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-196 | September 5, 2019 Page 1 of 5
[1] Percy Scott appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court after he was
convicted of Level 3 Felony Rape,1 arguing that the sentence is inappropriate in
light of the nature of the offense and his character. We affirm.
Facts
[2] On December 12, 2017, at 3:12 AM, police were dispatched to an Evansville
residence in response to a call about a “sensitive incident.” Appellant’s App.
Vol. II p. 30.2 Upon arrival at the residence, police found T.H., an adult
female, sitting on a couch inside the home. T.H. wore a shirt but no pants or
underwear, and her face was swollen and covered in fresh bruises and scratches.
T.H. did not know anyone who lived at the residence, and told police she was
there because she had fled Scott’s home seeking help.
[3] T.H. reported to police that earlier that evening, she had gone to see Scott at his
nearby apartment and that he had raped her and held her against her will for
three hours. T.H. showed the officers the house from which she had fled.
Officers approached the home and were met at the back door by Scott, who had
blood on his clothes and a swollen bottom lip. Scott was arrested and T.H. was
transported to the hospital for treatment of her injuries and for a sexual assault
1
Ind. Code § 35-42-4-1(a)(1).
2
Because no facts regarding the underlying crime were recounted at the sentencing hearing and the transcript
of the factual basis established at the guilty plea hearing is not included in the record on appeal, we join both
parties by relying on the facts provided in the probable cause affidavit.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-196 | September 5, 2019 Page 2 of 5
examination. The hospital revealed bruising on her cervix in addition to the
visible external bruises and scratches.
[4] At the hospital, T.H. told officers that Scott had invited T.H. over to his
apartment. They both drank several alcoholic beverages, after which Scott
began to make sexual advances on T.H. When T.H. resisted his advances,
Scott became extremely angry and aggressive and hit her with his fists, causing
T.H. to lose consciousness. When she awoke, she was lying on her back in
Scott’s living room, unclothed from the waist down, and Scott was performing
oral sex on her. She once again tried to resist Scott, who held her down while
hitting her in the face and head with his fists. T.H. stated that she believed
Scott was going to kill her, so she bit his lower lip in the hope of leaving some
evidence of his attack. As soon as she could, T.H. escaped by telling Scott she
needed to use the restroom and running out the back door, leaving her clothing
and belongings behind. She knocked on doors of nearby houses until someone
let her in and let her call the police.
[5] On December 14, 2017, the State charged Scott with Level 3 felony rape, Level
3 felony criminal confinement, and Level 5 felony battery. On January 7, 2019,
Scott pleaded guilty to rape, and the State dismissed the other charges. The
trial court sentenced Scott to nine years imprisonment. Scott now appeals.
Discussion and Decision
[6] Scott’s sole argument on appeal is that the sentence is inappropriate in light of
the nature of the offense and his character.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-196 | September 5, 2019 Page 3 of 5
[7] Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) provides that this Court may revise a statutorily
authorized sentence “if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, the
Court finds that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense
and the character of the offender.” In conducting this review, “substantial
deference” must be given to the trial court’s decision, “since the ‘principal role
of [our] review is to attempt to leaven the outliers,’ and not to achieve a
perceived ‘correct’ sentence.” Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274, 1292 (Ind. 2014)
(quoting Chambers v. State, 989 N.E.2d 1257, 1259 (Ind. 2013)) (internal
citations omitted).
[8] For Level 3 felony rape, Scott faced a term of three to sixteen years, with an
advisory sentence of nine years. Ind. Code § 35-50-2-5. The trial court imposed
the advisory nine-year sentence.
[9] Scott provides no argument for revision based on the nature of the offense and
relies entirely on his character to support his claim that his sentence is
inappropriate. According to the probable cause affidavit, the offense was brutal
and violent, to the point of T.H. fearing for her life. Scott also left T.H. covered
in visible, external injuries as well as bruises to her cervix.
[10] With respect to Scott’s character, we note that he has an extensive criminal
history, including charges of domestic battery and possession of illicit
substances and convictions for larceny, operating a vehicle without a license,
and intimidation. See Rutherford v. State, 866 N.E.2d 867, 874 (Ind. Ct. App.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-196 | September 5, 2019 Page 4 of 5
2007) (holding that we may consider a defendant’s history of arrests as a
reflection of his character).
[11] Scott argues that his lack of prior felony convictions or convictions for similar,
related offenses demonstrates his good character. However, the trial court
noted that his history primarily involved controlled substances and driving
offenses when it imposed the advisory term. Further, at his sentencing hearing,
Scott showed a complete lack of remorse and respect for authority. He told the
judge that he was “not going to take no f*cking nine years” and to “[k]iss my
ass on that.” Tr. p. 10. While Scott’s character may not be the worst of the
worst, nothing in the record persuades us that the advisory term was
inappropriate.
[12] We do not find the sentence imposed by the trial court to be inappropriate in
light of the nature of the offense and Scott’s character.
[13] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Kirsch, J., and Crone, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-196 | September 5, 2019 Page 5 of 5