Kingston Technology Co., Inc. v. Polaris Innovations Ltd.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC., Appellant v. POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellee ______________________ 2018-1778 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 01623. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JOHN BALLANCO, Washington, DC. NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, Lowenstein & Weather- wax LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also rep- resented by KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court