FILED
TN COURI'OF
l'\ ORKI.R.S' CO:MPl.N.SATIO
CI.AD.l S
Time· 11 : IO ...W
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
AT COOKEVILLE
Linda Green, ) Docket No.: 2016-04-0085
Employee, )
v. )
Rogers Group, ) State File No.: 99072-2015
Employer, )
And )
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., ) Judge Robert Durham
Carrier. )
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY DISABILITY
BENEFITS AND DENYING MEDICAL BENEFITS
(Decision on the Record)
This cause came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge upon the
Request for Expedited Hearing (REH) filed by Ms. Green to determine if Rogers Group
is obligated to pay for medical treatment Ms. Green received following her fall at work as
well as temporary total disability benefits. Ms. Green requested the Court issue a ruling
based on a review of the file without an evidentiary hearing, and Rogers Group did not
object.
On March 16, 2017, the Court sent a Docketing Notice to the parties regarding the
contents of the record before it. Neither party objected to the Court considering any of
the records listed in the Docketing Notice in rendering its decision. Considering the
positions of the parties, the applicable law, and all of the evidence submitted, the Court
concludes it needs no further information to render judgment. The Court holds Ms.
Green has provided sufficient evidence to establish she is likely to prevail at a
compensation hearing with regard to temporary total disability benefits, but not regarding
medical expenses incurred subsequent to her initial discharge from the hospital.
History of Claim
On December 11, 2015, Ms. Green was working as a dispatcher for Rogers Group,
1
a rock and gravel provider, when she fell approximately eight feet from a catwalk while
at a ticket printer box. Although it did not dispute the fall occurred, Rogers Group
originally denied the claim on the basis that Ms. Green was intoxicated at the time of the
fall.
Following an expedited hearing, the Court issued an order on February 21, 20 17,
holding Rogers Group was unlikely to prevail at a compensation hearing on its
intoxication defense. The Court ordered Rogers Group to pay for Ms. Green's
emergency room treatment from December 11 through her initial discharge on December
13, and further ordered Rogers Group to provide a panel of physicians from which Ms.
Green could seek further medical care. However, the Court also held that Ms. Green did
not provide sufficient evidence to establish the reasonableness and necessity of medical
expenses incurred through her readmission to the hospital from December 13 through 17,
or her request for temporary disability benefits while off work following her fall. (T .R.
3.) Ms. Green filed this REH in an attempt to obtain those benefits. (T.R. 1.)
At the prior hearing, Ms. Green and her husband, Larry Green, testified that
immediately following her discharge from Skyline on the 13th, they received a phone call
from Skyline urging her to return to the hospital as quickly as possible due to tests that
revealed a serious oxygen deficiency. Ms. Green immediately returned by ambulance to
Skyline complaining of "feeling terrible" and suffering from respiratory insufficiency.
She was readmitted to the hospital, where she stayed until December 17. According to
the discharge report recently provided by Ms. Green, Dr. David Bentley opined that Ms.
Green had been discharged "prematurely" by the nursing staff at Skyline on December
13. (Ex. 3.)
According to the admission report from December 13, Ms. Green suffered
"multiple right-sided rib fractures and transverse process fractures of her lumbar spine."
Ms. Green underwent a chest CT that revealed a right hydropneumothorax that was not
present on the study taken on December 11. Dr. Benjamin Tourkow also diagnosed Ms.
Green with a pulmonary embolism in her right lung and a partial lung collapse. (Ex. 1 at
1, 2, 7, 24.) Skyline treated Ms. Green's embolism with blood thinners, Heparin and
Coumadin, and kept her under close observation during her hospital stay. When
discharged, Dr. Haile Mezghebe recommended Ms. Green avoid strenuous activity, with
no lifting more than three to five pounds; use home oxygen, an LSO brace, and an
incentive spirometer at home; and continue taking pain medication and Coumadin with
regular check-ups of her Coumadin levels. (Ex. 3.)
As recommended by Dr. Mezghebe, Ms. Green sought additional treatment with
her personal care physician, Richard Rutherford, at Carthage Family Practice (CFP), who
monitored her Coumadin levels. 1 On January 18, 2016, Physician's Assistant Peter
1
While Ms. Green primarily saw Physician's Assistant, Peter Alfano, at CFP, Dr. Rutherford reviewed and
2
Alfano recorded Ms. Green was there for "follow-up/recent evaluation of right rib
fractures from a fall on 12/11115. Resulted in secondary pneumothorax and pulmonary
embolus." (Ex. 3.)
Ms. Green continued treatment with CFP, noting improvement on February 18,
and stating she was "ready to return to work as a truck dispatcher." !d. at 16. Ms. Green
provided a letter from Dr. Rutherford dated February 23, stating that Ms. Green was
under his care beginning on December 21 , 2015, and was released to return to work on
February 22, 2016. He further stated that "her loss of work during this time was directly
related to her work comp. injury." (Ex. 4.) Ms. Green continued to treat at CFP for pain
in her low back and right ribs until April 24. She also offered a note from Acute Surgical
Care Specialists stating she was under doctor's care from December 13 through
December 29, 2015.
According to Ms. Green's wage statement, her average weekly wage with Rogers
Group was $943.69, resulting in a compensation rate of$629.26.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
As in all workers' compensation actions, Ms. Green, as the claimant, has the
burden of proof on all essential elements of her claim. Scott v. Integrity Staffing
Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). However,
since this is an expedited hearing, she only has the burden to come forward with
sufficient evidence from which the trial court can determine she is likely to prevail at a
hearing on the merits in order to meet her burden. McCord v. Advantage Human
Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
In its defense of Ms. Green's claim for benefits, Rogers Group first argues that the
Court has already rendered a decision with regard to these benefits. In its previous order,
the Court ordered Rogers Group to provide a panel of physicians from which Ms. Green
can choose an authorized physician and deferred any decision regarding temporary
benefits and further reimbursement of past medical expenses until the authorized
physician addressed these issues. Thus, Rogers Group argues, since Ms. Green has yet to
choose an authorized physician, any decision regarding issues of temporary disability
benefits and past medical expenses would be premature.
The Court's February 21 Expedited Hearing Order was an interlocutory order. See
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (20 16). "Interlocutory" is defined as "provisional,
temporary, not final, i.e., something intervening between the commencement and the end
of the suit which decided some point or matter, but is not the final decision of the whole
controversy." Gentry v. Gentry, 2016 Tenn. App. LEXIS 948, at 8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec.
approved the records as noted by his electronic signature.
3
9, 2016). Given that the Expedited Hearing Order is not the "final decision," both parties
have the opportunity to present new evidence on issues that were decided by the Court
based on the evidence that was before it at the time. !d.
As to the Court's "deferral" of these issues until an authorized physician addressed
them, such language was merely a means to indicate that the issues could be reintroduced
once either party obtained additional evidence. To exclude either party from entering
otherwise admissible evidence for the Court to consider on issues regarding medical
benefits and temporary disability would be contrary to the intent of the Expedited
Hearing process. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(l) (20 16). Therefore, the Court
must consider whether Ms. Green provided sufficient additional evidence to warrant a
holding that she is likely to prevail in establishing her entitlement to the medical expenses
and temporary disability benefits in question.
With regard to medical expenses, whether an employee is justified in seeking
payment for unauthorized medical expenses from an employer depends upon the
circumstances of each case. Buchanan v. Mission Ins. Co., 713 S.W.2d 654, 656 (Tenn.
1986). An injured employee "has the burden of establishing the necessity and
reasonableness of charges incurred under physicians not designated or otherwise
approved by the employer." Russell v. Genesco, Inc., 651 S.W.2d 206, 211 (Tenn. 1983).
Ms. Green's supplemental evidence establishes that her discharge from Skyline was
"premature" and she was urged to return to the emergency room by Carthage Family
Practice. While this evidence is sufficient to establish her need for continued medical
treatment, it does not establish a causal link between her work accident and the need for
treatment. Furthermore, no physician has addressed the reasonableness and necessity of a
four-day stay in the hospital following her initial discharge or the subsequent treatment
provided by Carthage Family Practice. Ms. Green must present expert medical opinion
addressing these issues before the Court can determine she would be likely to prevail at a
compensation hearing, and she has yet to do so.
In order to receive temporary total disability benefits, Ms. Green must prove ( 1)
total disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal
connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period
of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Canst. Co., Inc., et al., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). It goes without saying that Ms. Green was totally
disabled while in the hospital on December 12 and 13, which the Court previously found
was due to her work-related injury. Furthermore, Ms. Green provided a note from Dr.
Richard Rutherford, her family practitioner, stating she was unable to work from
December 21, 2015, through February 22, 2016, and her inability to work was "directly
related" to her work injury.
Therefore, based on the evidence before the Court at this time, the Court finds Ms.
Green is likely to prove she is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for December
4
12 and 13, 2015, as well as from December 21, 2015, through February 22, 2016. Based
on her compensation rate of $629.26, this totals $5,843.13 in temporary total disability
benefits, which Rogers Group is obligated to pay Ms. Green.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED:
1. Rogers Group shall pay temporary total disability benefits m the amount of
$5,843.13.
2. Rogers Group is not required to pay any medical expenses incurred subsequent to
Ms. Green's initial discharge from Skyline Hospital on December 13, 2015, at this
time.
3. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on April 10, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. C.S.T.
The parties or their counsel must call615-253-0010 or toll-free at 855-689-9049 to
participate in the hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the
issues without your further participation.
4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3)
(2016). The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of
compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to
WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after
entry of this Order. Failure to submit the necessary confirmation within the period
of compliance may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For
questions regarding compliance, please contact the Workers' Compensation
Compliance Unit via email WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov or by calling (615)
253-1471.
ENTERED THIS THE t:;) _th DAY OF APRIL, 2017.
R bert V. Durham, Judge
Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
5
APPENDIX
Exhibits:
1. All exhibits entered from the Expedited Hearing Order issued from an On~the~
Record determination on November 3, 2016, as well as all exhibits and testimony
from the Expedited Hearing on February 10, 2017
2. Affidavit of Ms. Green
3. Additional medical records from Skyline Medical Center
4. Letter from Dr. Richard Rutherford
Technical Record:
1. Request for Expedited Hearing
2. Employer's Response to REH
3. Expedited Hearing Order entered on February 21, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the _5th day of
April, 20 17.
Name Certified Via Via Service sent to:
Mail Fax Email
Linda Green X X P.O. Box 32,
Riddleton, TN 37151
cookiei oeg@gmail.com
Heather Douglas X hdouglas@Jmanierherod.com
Pe ny Sh u , Clerk of Court
Court of orkers' Compensation Claims
WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
6