Gallogly v. United States

Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2020 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REBECCA GALLOGLY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, Respondent ______________________ 2020-150 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW, Senior Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. ______________________ ON PETITION AND MOTION ______________________ Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Rebecca Gallogly petitions for a writ of mandamus di- recting the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket submissions entitled “Plaintiff’s Amended Objections to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment,” ECF No. 2-1 at 10–28, and “Motion for Leave Case: 20-150 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2020 2 GALLOGLY v. US to File Amended Objections,” ECF No. 2-1 at 29–45. She also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Review of the docket before the Court of Federal Claims shows that these documents were entered on the docket on September 14, 2020. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Aug. 28, 2020), ECF No. 33. Additionally, on September 21, 2020, that court granted Dr. Gallogly’s motion for leave to file amended objections. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2020), ECF No. 35. Because Dr. Gallogly has received the requested relief, we deny her petition as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. (2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. FOR THE COURT October 19, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court s25