United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-11422
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID WAYNE WRIGHT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-22-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
David Wayne Wright appeals from the 24-month sentence
imposed following the revocation of his supervised release.
Wright contends that the sentence was unreasonable and that the
district court failed to consider the sentencing factors set
forth at 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). This court must examine the basis
of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v.
Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Article III, § 2, of
the Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual
cases and controversies. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-11422
-2-
(1998). The case-or-controversy requirement demands that “some
concrete and continuing injury other than the now-ended
incarceration or parole -- some ‘collateral consequence’ of the
conviction -- must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” Id.
Wright has served the sentence that was imposed upon the
revocation of his supervised release. The order revoking
Wright’s term of supervised release imposed no further term of
supervised release. Accordingly, there is no case or controversy
for this court to address, and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED.