UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6102
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Leesa Washington,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Wright appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and the court’s
January 4, 2012, oral order denying his motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by
the district court. See Sloas v. CSX Transp., Inc., 616 F.3d
380, 388 (4th Cir. 2010) (providing abuse of discretion standard
for review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) denial of motion to
reconsider); United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.
2010) (providing abuse of discretion review standard for denial
of motion to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2)). Accordingly,
we affirm. United States v. Wright, No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-1
(D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2011 & Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2