People v. Bellamy

People v Bellamy (2021 NY Slip Op 04311)
People v Bellamy
2021 NY Slip Op 04311
Decided on July 9, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 9, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

644 KA 19-02111

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ASHTON BELLAMY, ALSO KNOWN AS AMIR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.




RYAN JAMES MULDOON, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (ERICH D. GROME OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G. Leone, J.), rendered May 30, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [7]), defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently or voluntarily entered. Defendant's contention is not preserved for review inasmuch as he failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Jones, 175 AD3d 1845, 1845-1846 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 1078 [2019]; People v Mobayed, 158 AD3d 1221, 1222 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 1015 [2018]). This case does not fall within the rare exception to the preservation requirement set forth in People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). We decline to exercise our power to review defendant's contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).

Entered: July 9, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court