(concurring)—Although I dissented in State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d 863, 889, 959 P.2d 1061 (1998), I must concur in the result of the majority opinion here because Mr. Hutchinson has failed to carry his burden of establishing that the “constitutional error [s] worked to his ‘actual and substantial prejudice.’ ” In re Pers. Restraint of St. Pierre, 118 Wn.2d 321, 328, 823 P.2d 492 (1992) (quoting In re Pers. Restraint of Haverty, 101 Wn.2d 498, 504, 681 P.2d 835 (1984)).