[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 05-13244 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 26, 2006
________________________
THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 04-00483-CR-T-24-TGW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANFORD TAYLOR-WALTER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(April 26, 2006)
Before ANDERSON, FAY and SILER*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
_____________________
*Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
We note that appellant does not challenge his conviction, and it is
accordingly affirmed. After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude
that the appellant’s sentence is also due to be affirmed. The government’s
challenge to the court’s jurisdiction to review the sentence for reasonableness is
foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Martinez, 434 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir.
2006). Appellant’s challenges to the district court’s denial of the safety-valve
adjustment and a minor role reduction, as well as his challenge to the
reasonableness of his sentence, are rejected for the reasons discussed at oral
argument.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
2