United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 5, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-60518
Summary Calendar
CHARLES L. STRINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN MAY; SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division
USDC No. 3:05-CV-552
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellant Charles Stringer (“Stringer”) filed suit against
his automobile insurer, Safeway Insurance Company, and one of its
adjusters, Kathleen May (“the Defendants”). The district court
granted the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed
Stringer’s suit. Stringer appeals to this Court.
We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de
novo. Gowesky v. Singing River Hosp. Sys., 321 F.3d 503, 507
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
(5th Cir. 2003). Furthermore, because Stringer is proceeding in
this matter pro se, his pleadings must be liberally construed.
Pena v. United States, 122 F.3d 3, 4 (5th Cir. 1997). We have
carefully examined the briefs, the record excerpts, and relevant
portions of the record itself. We believe the district court
fully considered and properly rejected all of Stringer’s
arguments. For the reasons stated in the district court’s
Opinion and Order granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment, and the district court’s Opinion and Order denying
Stringer’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, we affirm the
decision to enter final judgment against Stringer.
AFFIRMED.