Appellant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed sexual battery and his sentence to life in prison. He alleges that the trial court reversibly erred by (1) assisting the prosecutor in admitting evidence, (2) denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for kidnapping, and (3) allowing a DNA expert to bolster his own testimony. We find these issues to be without merit, and as such, we affirm.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.