Willard Paul appeals the summary denial of an amended rule 3.850 motion. Although the final order did not specifically address each of Paul’s claims, the order dismissing his original 3.850 motion explained why each of the claims was insufficient, and Paul did not cure the deficiencies in his amended motion. Because his claims are facially insufficient and without merit, we affirm.
GROSS, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.