Tucker v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant, through his attorney, files a motion for rehearing, in which he refers to the fact. *529that in our former opinion we stated that no brief was»on file for the appellant. He correctly insists that a brief was on file, and wants us to review the record in the light of his brief. This has been done, but we are not led to change our minds as to the sufficiency of the testimony.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

Overruled-