NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS CABRERA-CAMPOS, AKA Luis No. 19-71212
Campos-Cabrera, AKA Jesus Garcia
Miranda, Agency No. A099-625-275
Petitioner,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Luis Cabrera-Campos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
and terminate removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v.
Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and the denial of a motion to terminate,
Dominguez v. Barr, 975 F.3d 725, 734 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for
review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cabrera-Campos’ motion to
reopen and terminate where his contention that the immigration court lacked
jurisdiction over his proceedings is foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d
887, 895 (9th Cir. 2020) (“the lack of time, date, and place in the NTA sent to
[petitioner] did not deprive the immigration court of jurisdiction over her case”).
In light of this disposition, we need not reach Cabrera-Campos’ contentions
regarding the timeliness of his motion. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532,
538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the
results they reach).
The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 19-71212