Kiser v. State

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, J.

In the motion for rehearing, it is again urged that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence upon the issue of appellant’s mental condition. With this point in mind, the facts have been closely re-examined. We are confirmed in our view that the jury did no violence to the evidence in concluding that appellant was sane at the time the theft was committed and was legally responsible for his acts.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.