On Motion for Rehearing.
HAWKINS, J.The evidence offered, on appellant’s part, if believed, would have authorized the jury in finding that the state’s witnesses were mistaken in identifying appellant. IS was purely a question of fact The jury accepted the evidence of witnesses for the state. Giving effect to their testimony, this court would not be warranted in saying the evidence was not sufficient to support the conviction.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.